Effect of computer components on analysis time

"s_f_d":2h73qez3" said:
result obtained with this system (without external video card).
Click to expand...
is exactly the system I was wondering about, no need for a video card by the way (I know) your ram must be ddr4 in my system i3-6098p - 8gb It took 345 seconds with ddr4 ram, your system finished in 195 seconds 345/195= 1.78 times faster, but still, if we look at it in terms of economy, I only collected the case for the price of your i7.
 
Of course, this is a negligible difference for a project of this size. However, as the size of the project grows, the difference increases. In a project I tested myself, it went from 14 minutes to 7.52 minutes. The video card hasn't arrived yet, I'll try once more when I plug it in Of course, the price-performance preference is up to you. good work.
 
"s_f_d":2wxb0yez" said:
This is an insignificant difference for a project of this size, of course. However, as the size of the project grows, the difference increases. In a project I tested myself, it went from 14 minutes to 7.52 minutes. I will try again. Of course, the price-performance preference is up to you. Good work.
Click to expand...
If the size of the project grows, the income from the project and the expense of computer parts will not be considered, of course ;) I think that if you install a video card, the result will not change. How is the situation with xeon processors, thanks for your time
 
2 Years Monster Notebook NVIDIA Gforce GTX 980M Total time 3.44 minutes for Semi-Rigid Diaphragm If the same structure is modeled as Rigid diaphragm, total time is 19s
 
orjinal haliyle analiz yapinca 3dk 21sn (mod sayisi 54 olarak girilmis)
default mod sayisi 18 yapinca 1dk 54sn (bu durumda Raporda mod sayisi yeterli gorunuyor)

------------------
System Information
------------------
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
System Model: Precision 7510
BIOS: BIOS Date: 07/28/17 04:39:24 Ver: 1.14.4.00
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1545M v5 @ 2.90GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.9GHz
Memory: 65536MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 65320MB RAM
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 12
---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics P580
Manufacturer: Intel Corporation
Chip type: Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics Family
Display Memory: 32788 MB
Dedicated Memory: 128 MB
Shared Memory: 32660 MB
Current Mode: 1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz)
Monitor Name: Generic PnP Monitor
Monitor Model: unknown
Monitor Id: SHP1430
Native Mode: 3840 x 2160(p) (59.997Hz)

Card name: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: Quadro M2000M
Display Memory: 36694 MB
Dedicated Memory: 4034 MB
Shared Memory: 32660 MB
Native Mode: 3840 x 2160
------------------------
Disk & DVD/CD-ROM Drives
------------------------
Drive: C:
Free Space: 296.1 GB
Total Space: 475.6 GB
File System: NTFS
Model: Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB

Drive: D:
Total Space: 500.8 GB
Model: Crucial_CT525MX300 SSD1
 
I wanted to share the analysis time (2.58 min) after oc, in addition to the system data before the mod number was changed (analysis time was 3.15 min).
 
Hello, With TBDY 2018, the analysis load has increased. How many cores can v10 work efficiently on processors? As you know, most software cannot use more than a certain number of cores. For example, the AMD Threadripper 2970WX processor has 24 cores. Can it use all cores of this processor?
 
ideCAD uses all available processor cores without a limit on the number. It uses all cores of this 24-core processor. However, due to the nature of static analysis, not all processes can be executed in parallel. (Some basic operations such as stiffness matrix reduction are iterative in nature of the calculation and must be done consecutively). Therefore, if there are many processor cores, the analysis time will be shorter, but this acceleration may not be proportional to the number of increments of the core. For example, this 24-core processor may not be 24 times faster than a single processor, considering the whole time. For this reason, we use intel processors that catch the balance of the two, instead of processors such as AMD threadripper, which are slow on a single core basis, but compensate for this slowness with numbers. (like i7-8700K, i7-9700K, i9-9900K)
 
I compared a faster workstation with my current computer in a 9-floor 6000 m2 reinforced concrete project. The analysis times were 21 minutes on my computer and 19 minutes on the workstation computer. There was little difference (analysis time was 85 minutes in a combined project with 9 floors, 3 blocks of reinforced concrete blocks, and basements). Can you suggest a workstation computer at a speed that can halve the processing time? processing times cause serious problems in job production because my computer is msi gs72 6qe i7 6700hq 2.6 ghz 8 gb ram ddr4 nvdia gtx 670m graphics card 256 gb ssd worstation computer ntel Xeon CPU E5- 2683 v3 @ 2.00 Ghz (28 cores) 32 GB ram DDR4 Quadro P200 Graphics Card 5 GB Samsung 960 Evo 250 gb Asus Z10pe-d8 ws 2011-3 DDR4 2133 Mhz Motherboard
 
"myanswer":dglcsngk" said:
I compared my current computer with a faster workstation in a 9-floor 6000 m2 reinforced concrete project. The analysis times were 21 minutes on my computer and 19 minutes on the workstation computer. analysis time 85 min) you mentioned the reason for this but can you suggest a workstation computer with a speed that can reduce this process time in half?The processing times cause very serious problems in work production because my computer is msi gs72 6qe i7 6700hq 2.6 ghz 8 gb ram ddr4 nvdia gtx 670m video card 256 gb ssd worstation computer ntel Xeon CPU E5- 2683 v3 @ 2.00 Ghz (28 cores) 32 GB ram DDR4 Quadro P200 Graphics Card 5 GB Samsung 960 Evo 250 gb Asus Z10pe-d8 ws 2011-3 DDR4 2133 Mhz Motherboard
Click to expand...
Add the project that took 21 minutes on your computer here
 
"Ismail Hakki Besler":f6r24uw7" said:
"myanswer":f6r24uw7" said:
I compared a faster workstation with my current computer in a 9-floor 6000 m2 reinforced concrete project, the analysis times were 21 minutes on my computer and 19 minutes on the workstation computer. (Analysis time is 85 minutes in a combined project with 9 floors, 3 blocks, reinforced concrete blocks, basements, and basements). processing times cause serious problems in job production because my computer is msi gs72 6qe i7 6700hq 2.6 ghz 8 gb ram ddr4 nvdia gtx 670m graphics card 256 gb ssd worstation computer ntel Xeon CPU E5- 2683 v3 @ 2.00 Ghz (28 cores) 32 GB ram DDR4 Quadro P200 Graphics Card 5 GB Samsung 960 Evo 250 gb Asus Z10pe-d8 ws 2011-3 DDR4 2133 Mhz Motherboard
Click to expand...
Add the project that takes 21 minutes on your computer here
Click to expand...
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"myanswer":fzn118p8" said:
https://we.tl/t-er9Ib51Pa3
Click to expand...
It took me 18.20 as well. From this result I understand that the most important is the processor speed. the processor we can get performance
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
or
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Processor: Intel i5 6500 @ 3.20 -> 3.50 GHz RAM: 16 GB DDR4 @ 2333 MHz Graphics card: Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti Storage: 500 MB/s SSD
 
Core i9-9900K processor Z390 motherboard 2666Mhz 32 GB RAM Duration: 10 minutes 50 seconds.
 
Floor finite element width : 40 cm Curtain finite element width : 40 cm Number of nodes : 64.526 Number of rod elements : 6.589 Number of shell elements : 62.222 Project Features 1. Rigid Basement Floor , 8 Normal Floors + Elevator Tower With 8 shifted masses in total modal analysis. Analysis time 23:58
 
This topic is very useful for those who are planning to collect a new system. For example, I was considering the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950 WX processor for a while. I was very surprised to see the result of 24 minutes shared by Mr. Yasin. Ok, the number of cores does not bring performance directly proportional, but although the speed is equal to the i5 6500 that I use, the same analysis was completed in 18 minutes on my computer. An interesting result indeed. If I repeat, it doesn't make much difference after 4 cores, the important thing is the speed of the processor and the Intel brand. The Intel i9 9900K or i7-8086K are the best price / performance products right now.
 
Motherboard: CPU Type QuadCore Intel Core i7-4790K, 4400 MHz (44 x 100) Motherboard Name MSI Z97A Gaming 7 (MS-7916) Motherboard Chipset Intel Wildcat Point Z97, Intel Haswell System Memory 32716 MB (DDR3-1333 DDR3 SDRAM)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top