Download ideCAD Structural v10.93

Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Published *New*(02.05.2019)*Y Since the floor height and column have changed, the project has not been implemented yet. So why not make it from scratch according to the new regulation? Is it because it's slab-type hollow block and you're stuck with the building height class? Performance analysis should not be requested for a project that has not yet started. Be sure to consult your municipality, your work may go in vain. Currently, you cannot perform pushover analysis with ideCAD. It will come with an update.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Published *New*(02.05.2019)*Y They have made the finished building floors 10 cm high in practice. 10-storey hollow building, solved according to the old regulation. The municipality wants a renovation project according to the new regulation.
"MaFiAMaX":1iypgwmn" said:
The project has not been implemented yet since the floor height and column have changed. So why don't you build it from scratch according to the new regulation? Is it because the floor type is hollow floor and you are stuck in the building height class? Performance analysis should not be requested for a project that has not yet started. consult, your work may be wasted. You cannot do pushover analysis with ideCAD at the moment. It will come with an update.
Click to expand...
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released *New*(02.05.2019)*Y Hello, I would like to specify my question with an example. In the ground survey report, the SOIL CARRYING POWER reached me as 50 t/m2. In the Idecad Analysis settings, since the soil bearing capacity qt value is requested, I entered 50t/m2 /1.4 =35.17t/m2 according to the Regulation Table 16.2 and completed the analysis. On the Idecad report pages, since these phrases are stated as Soil Bearing Capacity, I was informed that 35.17t/m2 value cannot be used in project controls and I should use 50t/m2. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to change the place specified as Soil Bearing Strength qt in İdecad analysis settings to Design Strength (in order to eliminate this conceptual confusion)?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released *New*(02.05.2019)*Y Hello
"volvoxx":3q0kwdic" said:
FLOOR BEARING POWER reached me as 50 t/m2 in the ground survey report In the İdecad Analysis settings, I entered the value of 50t/m2 /1.4 =35.17t/m2 according to the Regulation Table 16.2, and completed the analysis, since the qt value of the Soil Bearing Capacity was requested. I was informed that the /m2 value cannot be used and that I should use 50t/m2
Click to expand...
Check if the ground survey report is given by dividing 1.4. If it is not written in the report, ask for it to be written. If the split value is 50 t/m2, you should use it.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Published (02.05.2019) hello, attached tk14 continuous foundation is defined by connecting the panel from two node points. The value of this buddha causes intense equipment to be thrown at the bottom left and right below. I would like to thank the friends who will help in this regard.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) Hello ; What kind of structure should I have in order to solve a structure with a fully rigid diaphragm. Can I solve a slab slab structure with a symmetrical plan of basement + ground floor + 4 normal floors with a fully rigid diaphragm.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) Hello
"karsaf":1l1g5249" said:
what kind of structure should I have in order to solve a structure with a fully rigid diaphragm.[/quote ] You can solve a structure that is close to symmetry, with rigid flooring, with no or few floor gaps, on floors.It would be appropriate to solve non-symmetrical, mid-floor, floor gap, weakly tiled structures on the floor as semi-rigid.
"karsaf":1l1g5249" said:
Can I solve a slab slab structure with a symmetrical plan of basement + ground floor + 4 normal floors with a fully rigid diaphragm.
Click to expand...
You can solve it. Unver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) first of all thanks for your reply. I want to ask one more thing. Does the RZ in the 1st mode mean that the building is twisted? How should I interpret this? Also, when we solve with full rigid diaphragm in the same project, 1st mode RZ comes out, and when we solve it with semi-rigid diaphragm, 1st mode RZ does not. what could be the reason for this
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019)
"karsaf":xbnc7iaj" said:
first of all thanks for your reply. I want to ask one more thing, does the RZ in the 1st mode mean that the building is twisted? How should I interpret this. Also, when we solve with a fully rigid diaphragm in the same project, the 1st mode RZ comes out and when we solve it with a semi-rigid diaphragm, the 1st mode RZ does not come out. What could be the reason for this.
Click to expand...
In the solution, Rz appears to be active in mode 1. Your load-bearing system is the reason why it appears Rz active in mode 1. You can change the orientation and/or dimensions of vertical members and/or form curtains on the A and L axes to reduce torsion Typical floor plan: The reason for the large Y dimension It is normal that when the solution with the displaced mass with , and at the same time the stiffness of the structure is concentrated in the core, it will come out like this Ritz fully rigid solution: Ritz semi-rigid solution: Eigen fully rigid solution: Eigen semi-rigid solution:
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) Hello, when we choose a mixed system in the control of Article 4.3.4.6, of which I also shared the SS, and if Mdev/Mo is less than 0.75, the program "Ductility level should be selected limited" gives direction. However, the system can be selected with a high ductility level, so; (Mdev/Mo 0.56 and 0.70 in my project, which I gave in SS, and I am solving high ductile because I could not solve that structure in a mixed system) and it would be more appropriate to write "mixed Ductility level condition is not met" instead of "The ductility level should be chosen limited".
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Published (02.05.2019) The maximum base pressure value in the chart in the Foundation subdiagram (24) and the maximum base pressure value in the report (28) are different each time. Our geotechnical brothers keep asking. What is the reason?
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) The building has a basement. In buildings with basements, two earthquake solutions are made for the upper and lower sections. For the basic calculation, these values are added appropriately and the calculation is made with the summed values. The combined values are printed in the report. The values shown on the program visualization screen are the results of the upper floor, that is, the results of the upper section, that is, the combinations of Ex and Ey only. However, ExB and EyB combinations are also made for the basement subsection. And the foundation is made by combining the upper and lower sections of these two earthquake calculations according to 4.10.3. Both the basement analysis results and their aggregated versions will be added to the visualization dialog later. These aggregated values are printed in the report. So they are not the same things to compare. To see the exact values of these, remove the Rigid basement sign and analyze first, this time the same values are printed in both the report and the dialog.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) The last selection command does not work in 2D drawing. One of the most important commands. Had the same issue including the latest version of V8. Previously this command was working great. Please let's move on to this topic. Good work.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) It shows the errors found only when I analyze the same project without making any changes in 3 pictures. I don't understand why there are different errors when I don't make any changes. Isn't there a reason why analyzes made in the same project with 5 minutes intervals show different errors?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
I added the project
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) Hello again, This situation occurs when semi-rigid and phased construction solution is active, it is among our notes. As a solution, you can close the phased construction calculation and choose a semi-rigid diaphragm solution, or open the phased construction calculation and choose a fully rigid diaphragm solution.
 
Re: ideCAD Static IDS v10.09 Released (02.05.2019) Hello ; The formwork plan of the building I show in the attached picture is a 7 cm dilatation system. I'm doing a one-stop solution. but if the overturning moment calculation is combined, should he not have to calculate the 2 of them separately? I wonder how I can analyze in order not to make a wrong calculation, I can get more accurate results. (note= ground + 3 storey building)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top