What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?

When we want to take the extensions of the inclined beams, both points are drawn at the same level, like a straight beam. Also, in the same project, inclined column and inclined beam junctions (column vertical expansions) are drawn straight. In the column stirrups (middle of the column), the drawing of the stirrups is blank. When we take the Column-Beam Junction Section, the connection of the inclined column with the beam is again (broken) an irrelevant drawing. The dimensions, elevation, and inclination angles of these drawing expansions I mentioned are not given. I think these problems need to be fixed in the new version. The feature in the previous 5 version is available in this section. However, in the new 6 version, these parts should have been corrected. I hope these issues will be fixed soon, good work.
 
When we choose the reinforcement diameter of the fonts, we cannot change the (fi) font. There should be at least a few font options in the diameter option, we can change other texts and numbers with different fonts, and we can also change (fi). For example, the reinforcement font in xxxx looks very nice on drawing sheets.
yaz___fontu.JPG
 
We can't see curved beams in reinforced concrete, beam reinforcement dialog. Joint detail drawing should be possible for column and beam connection details. Displaying curvilinear curtains in column ablation, and again like curved beams, we can't see reinforced concrete in the curtain reinforcement dialog.
 
Reading files from NETCAD If we can open the netcad files we receive from the municipality in digital environment directly in idecad, the program will be much more valuable for us.
 
1- Heat calculation in IdeCAD Static v6 (For this, calculation should be made in a model without a rigid diaphragm on the floors, otherwise normal strength will not occur in the beams. With the heat calculation, the height of the building without dilatation can be increased) 2- To be able to calculate for the effect of creep and shrinkage, 2- To be able to calculate the effect of the construction stages. Gradual calculation can be made, Without rigid diaphragm and P-delta effect, (There may be horizontal movement under vertical load due to floor plan and column changes in high-rise buildings), Taking into account the change of the elasticity module over time, Pre-made parts such as the inner core can be defined during construction, Reinforcements in the column section can be defined. A calculation can be made in which the effect on the modulus of elasticity can be taken into account 3- To be able to make static calculation of steel column, beam, cross section + section calculation (design), 4- To be able to make static calculation of composite column, beam + section calculation (design), 5- To be able to define general section, concrete steel Ability to take M-Caps in cross-section, perform performance control 6- I would like to be able to draw smoothly, to have the opportunity to draw from scratch with the advanced drawing editor, to be able to manage the layouts, to be able to make revisions, to be able to mark this automatically on the relevant sheets, and to have a smart drawing module. Good work
 
MY SUGGESTIONS TO UPDATE VERSION 6.0013. Here are my suggestions for inclusion in version 6.0013 updates. 1 )Depending on the option, all floors in the project can be drawn side by side (eg formwork plans, column application plans, beam extensions, vertical extensions, etc.) according to the floor categories. 2) In addition, formwork plan section location for formwork plans should be marked for all floors and placed on the drawing of the relevant floor with dimensions and elevations 3) Stirrup opening details in the column application plan, It should be placed in a table according to its types 4) Panel expansion drawings (vertical expansions) should be drawn continuously together with columns (such as beam details) 5)Panel object should be drawn together as beams The right bottom elevation, or bottom, top slope in the ide architect wall settings. 6) Reactivating the Geometry control dialog. warns the user as in the versions) 7) In the Automatic object name section, prevents the column numbers from starting with a different number due to the canceled ones 8) The ability to take detail drawings of inclined beams at different levels on the same floor, inclined in beam openings and beams according to their elevation 9) [color=#FF0000 ]On the same floor, drawings of straight and inclined beams at different elevations, inclined and elevation according to the column vertical expansion 10) Option to consider similar beams in beam details (upper for normal floors)
 
Re: MY SUGGESTIONS FOR UPDATE FOR VERSION 6.0013. 11) Bringing the Use text font option on all floors and drawings in the project general settings. 12) Introducing several types of alternatives for reinforcement fonts in formwork plans and expansions. 13) In the report settings, (city, district, plot number, parcel no. of the building) in the building location information section. can be done (there is, but can't login somehow)
 
Re: MY SUGGESTIONS FOR UPDATE FOR VERSION 6.0013. 14) Removal of the problem of the 3D window appearing disconnected when a straight or inclined beam connection is made (especially in different beams at the right end elevation) seem to be united. 15) When saving project data with IFC format, the screen, basic data of our project are lost because panel, (screen) and basic data are not in the recording option. These are the ones that come to my mind for now. ;) ;) Thanks
 
Re: MY SUGGESTIONS FOR UPDATE FOR VERSION 6.0013. Dear Tabanoglu Thanks for your interest and suggestions... Your list will be added to our records. Good work
 
Suggestion Hello, The section lines we added in the work plan are not displayed when we draw the formwork plan. We add the section line on the plan later. It would be nice if the automatic drawing of the section lines on the mold plans is added. Likewise, the dimension lines we add in the work plan are not displayed in the mold plan drawing. In the report section, the general layout of the building can be drawn, I wonder if the stiffness and mass centers can be shown on these drawings? I would be glad if you do a study on these issues. Good work
 
SLM. WE ARE LOOKING AT YOUR STEEL CONSTRUCTION STUDY... LIKE V6 DA V 5, I WANT IT TO AUTOMATICALLY CATCH THE ORIGIN POINT WHEN I TRANSFER MY DRAWINGS TO 2 BYE. THIS HAS CHANGED IN ARCHITECTURE. IT WAS EASY FOR ME TO ALIGN. I WANT YOU TO ENABLE GEOMETRY CONTROL IN THIS VERSION. I WANT YOU TO MAKE THE ACCOUNT OUTPUT MORE OPTIONS. BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF OUTPUT IS ALMOST FOLDED 3 E 4 E. FOR SUCH AS V5, YOU CAN PROVIDE AN OPTION FOR US TO RECEIVE IT. WE ARE STILL USING V5, EVEN BY GETTING THE V6. GOOD WORK.
 
Mr. Evrenor, the geometry control has been further improved and added to the program again. It will be in the new version coming soon. As you know, there are also reports in v6 that are not available in v5 (deflection calculation, slab min. thickness checks, general layout of the building, beam torsion report) etc. You can turn off these unwanted reports from the optional reports dialog. In a test we did, an average sized project, when the reports I mentioned are closed, the number of pages in v5 and v6 are as follows: v5:104 pages v6:220 pages We are working to reduce these 220 pages without compromising the content of the report, we estimate it to be around 150-170 pages. It seems unlikely that it will be less than that, or that the reports from v5 will be reintroduced.
 
SLM. A FRIEND MORE don't talk about her have THEREFROM BUT BENDE GEÇEMİYECEĞİM.KOLO BOY CUT without TELL THAT IS adjust the vertical section we DEN ALL FLOORS EACH OTHER ATTACHED GELSİN.B the WHEEL WHEEL DIE to pour EACH YAPIŞTIRMAYAYIM.HAT in ABARTICA I PERHAPS, BUT THE SAME COLUMNS GURUPLASIN.N FINE WOULD BE ESPECIALLY FOR MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS AND VARIABLE COLUMN SIZES. GOOD WORK...
 
HELLO. I TALKED ABOUT THE SUBJECT I WILL TALK ABOUT NOW, BUT HE SAID IT WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU TALKED WITH MR. LEVENT OR YASIN. BEN ARCHITECTURE AND CONCRETE both be I ATI my ARCHITECTURAL the KULLANIYORUM.DOLAYI EVERY BEAM COLUMN PANEL FLOOR I TRANSFER in GEÇİŞTİRMİYORUM.BETONARMEYE FOR ARCHITECTURE me draw A PROBLEM with HAZIRLIYORUM.DOLAYI in FIG will NOT THIS STRAIGHT strength DESTROYING THE ONLY THING IN ARCHITECTURE ACCOUNT otherwise my I WANT GÖREMEMEK.B ARCHITECTURE cartoonist career ACCOUNT otherwise my AS IS RATES I can in CONCRETE I can BE .because TRAPEZOID TRAPEZOID EC have I ACS in FLOORING wITH VISUAL AND CONCRETE TRANSFER I rearrange hAVE tHE SAME WAY in KALIYORUM.TEMEL MATTER MUCH BETTER OLUR.Y NEW CONCRETE TRANSFER I ONLY ANALYSIS oF ARTIFICIAL I İSTİYORUM.İKİ tO USE ONE ALREADY THIS MEANS DEĞİLMİDİR.B the APPEAL my DİKKET on to AL thinking thanks in advance I DECIDE. KIRIS DETERMINES ITS FUNDAMENTAL DIRECTION. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS MUST BE IN ARCHITECTURE
 
Dear Admin, I would appreciate if you could explain a little more about the steel bar element solution you are considering for Idecad v6. Will the solution be valid only for steel roofs or will it be valid for general steel structures (not single storey but multi-storey), will it be able to make the necessary investigation of the bar elements and present them as a report. In addition, joint point detailing and necessary controls will be possible. If these can be done, I am sure that idecad, which has proven its strength in reinforced concrete, will also make a breakthrough in steel, and in my opinion, it will be one of the indispensable programs that should be taken from the construction engineer.
 
It will be very good if the nodal point is carried in writing when we say age. Both in architecture and reinforced concrete...
 
When I want to make the transverse reinforcement fi8/18/9 in beam reinforcements fi8/9/9, it becomes fi8/9/5. it takes half of the middle one in the tightening zones. I should be able to do it as fi8/x/x.
 
hello, I want the detail expansions of the inclined beams to be oblique as well. The biggest problem I have with the bidet is that when we export the project as dwg, the layer setting of all drawings becomes one, which makes it difficult for us to draw and print in autocad. It would be great if these were edited.
 
Back
Top