What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?

"zeki78":2yga3d95" said:
to complete the project by entering the moment and load values of the columns in idecad by making the steel roof part in another program in reinforced concrete column steel projects with the possibility of horizontal and vertical loading and moment loading
Click to expand...
to the elements in v6. You can define loads in all directions to the and node points.You can create your own loading conditions and combinations.You will also soon have the opportunity to solve your steel roof as a composite single structure with your reinforced concrete system, so you don't need to enter loads/moments into your columns for this purpose.
 
"Altuğ":3enlmft3" said:
Does ideCAD Static 6 allow us to create models such as shopping malls with slab discontinuities in this version (by canceling the definition of the rigid diaphragm, thus transferring the displacements in the floor plane and their effects to the model)? Best regards.. .
Click to expand...
Yes, you have this possibility, you don't need to define the rigid diaphragms one by one, the program automatically finds and defines the rigid diaphragms different from the tiling discontinuities, or the objects that are not connected to any rigid diaphragm for you. Just enter your tiles as in v5 .
 
I would like a single full module to be released instead of variants such as nc, ids, professionel, enterprise as in v5. design of masonry structures, modeling and solving of reinforced concrete buildings with masonry roofs and drawings, etc. solution of under-wall foundations. the detailing of the longitudinal reinforcement leaning against the mold, not from the column, in continuous foundation expansions. The stretch feature can be used as in autocad. the non-blocking of dimensioning in two dimensions. Mr. Zeki said for reinforced concrete columns, can we get results by entering the loads into the foundation in steel column structures? To get the right solution interactively by sticking the continuous foundation to the raft foundation in the foundations. Showing the floor strips on the formwork plan in the beamless slab...
 
1-ribbed retaining wall solution, 2-moment reduction platform in cantilever and ribbed retaining walls, 3-providing integrated solution of stairs, dome and vaults with the modeled system, 4-minimizing drawing confusion in formwork plans, automatic section drawing, 5-panel and Possibility to leave spaces in beams, 6-variable section beam solution, arch beam solution, 7-pool solutions, 8-joint foundations can be dissolved together, 9-all kinds of loads can be entered into all kinds of building sections, 10-stage raft foundation solutions, 11-similar The possibility of grouping beam and column drawings, 12-system diagram in all drawing sheets, 13-grouped column table where column sizes and reinforcements can be viewed together 14-added a wide list of weight and load assumptions in accordance with the standards to the help section of the program are my immediate expectations. In fact, you have already stated that these opportunities will be provided, but my expectation will be enough for the first version in the direction of being able to... thank you, good luck. Cengiz Aydogan
 
Thank you for your contribution. Features currently available in v6 -v6 was considered as the only version. -Detailing of the longitudinal reinforcement leaning against the mold, not from the column, in continuous foundation expansions. -zeki said for reinforced concrete columns, can we get results by entering the loads into the foundation in steel column structures? (You can now define all kinds of loads on foundations through fictitious columns) -Pool solutions (All kinds of pool solutions, see examples) -Solution of foundations together in jointed structures, -Entering all kinds of loads into all kinds of building parts, - minimizing drawing confusion in pattern plans v6.010 version will be released from beta status in a few weeks. We will continue to make the arrangements you need most and enrich the program possibilities, especially your wishes to improve the drawings. You will be able to get these additions via automatic updates in the coming months.
 
I want to give some advice to my friends. While writing about the topics you want to be included in V6, as given in the attached link on the main page of this forum (
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
) If they read the innovations about V6, they will be saved from rewriting the same topic. In this way, our executive brothers will be freed from the problem of constantly responding to the same issue. It seems that most of the requests written on the forum have already been fulfilled. I think it's worth a read. With love and respect......
 
1-Recognition of the continuous foundations until the angle to be defined by the user, single drawing of the continuous foundation even though the column axes are different 2- Not specifying the details of the flooring reinforcements in the formwork plans, only the total length and number 3- When placed in Autocad, each element is thrown with a different layer (For example: Reinforcement length is a separate layer , reinforcement length separate, reinforcement separate, column dimension separate, external dimension separate etc.) 4- Automatic correction of column beam slab numbers within each floor 5- Pile foundation analysis 6- Automatic throwing of formwork sections together with formwork plans 7- Stair analysis with building drawing the detail drawings accordingly
 
First of all, what I don't understand is the constant comparison of idecad-autocad. As we all know, idecad is static, which, as it is discussed under this title, is a static analysis program first and foremost. The drawing feature is in the second plan. Improvements in analysis are also made for the drawing feature, which we see. Let me tell you for myself, I have never felt the need to use any other program for drawing other than IDE. You can already develop your own practical solutions when you use it for a long time and master the program. I don't understand what would be necessary for us if we expect everything from the program. take it. By the way, while I was reading through the messages, I saw some articles about the interventions in the report, frankly, I was very upset. I wonder if they forgot the engineering oath, like some doctors who forgot? We hope that we always remember that we have more responsibility over human life than even a doctor.
 
When we start using IdeCAD Static 6 version, will we be able to view and print static account reports saved in previous versions? Account reports of our old projects can be requested from us from time to time. When we did a version update before, we had problems opening reports saved in the old version.
 
The report program will not have the ability to open old version (including intermediate versions) rpt files. It will only be able to open its own version. However, you can overcome this problem in 2 ways: 1-You can open the report with the report program of the version you saved. (If you don't have it, you can request it to be sent by e-mail from our technical service) 2-You can save your report as a pdf file for archival purposes and open it with the Acrobar Reader program in the future.
 
As ideYAPI, we care about the possibilities listed below for future versions. I would like to get your thoughts on this. Autocad style command line Entering and editing architectural objects in a static program Prefabricated structures Masonry structures Modeling of infill walls Pile foundations Ground ( Terrain Modeling ) Automatically taking the ground loads of basement perimeter curtains Laying layout for reinforced concrete projects Wooden and steel snap roofs Construction phase analysis Nonlinear cable systems construction stage
 
Even the 6th version is being released later than expected. Even the demo is not ready yet. While this is the case, wouldn't it be strange to talk about the 7th version here? Also, we would like you to do these things in v6...
 
Mr. tawakkul; ideCAD Static 6 version will be available next week with v6.00010. From Monday, you can contact our offices and get detailed information about its features and request a demonstration. As it has been said before, the widely used demo program will be available to you in the spring of 2009, as there are a few more new features that we are considering adding to v6 (the demo version will be able to record). However, you can get a time-limited trial version if you wish. We are aware that the release of v6 took a little longer compared to other versions, because the structural analysis part of v6 was almost completely redesigned and written to meet current and future engineering needs. If you export your v6 projects to SAP2000 and examine them , you will see the reason for the "delay". We are planning our versions by taking into account your expectations, having 6 versions of the aforementioned possibilities would have extended the development and release process considerably.
 
I would like to have the calculations and drawings of well type (shoring) foundations in Mr. İsmail's to-do list. Both in 6 versions. We encounter a lot of demand because of the low cost compared to the pile foundation.
 
*When calculating the coefficient of alpha s (the ratio of the shear force occurring on the shearing force to the shear occurring on the building floor), basement panels are also taken into account and the alpha s ratio is greater than 1, so this should be corrected... *One of the panel elements designed especially in the basement floors of the building detecting the rigid diaphragm that occurs by the program and reporting it with a warning... (There is no definite standard regarding this situation, that is, if the entire basement is not surrounded by panels, can it be taken as rigid, or if there is a percentage of panels, there is no clarity in the regulations as to how rigid diaphragm is acceptable?) making an arrangement to eliminate this confusion... *to make lateral soil thrust on the basement panels... *assigns the amphitheatre distribution equipment as fi 10, to be user defined... *For A,B and C type floors; We know that soil safety stress can be increased "up to 50%" when earthquake loading is used in foundations. This increase is left to the discretion of the engineer. but there is only 50% option to increase in the program. this tab is also user-defined, 10%, 20%, 25%, 40%...etc *displaying the mounting and pressure reinforcements separately in beams... *reinforcing ratios (balanced reinforcement) of all elements (column, beam..) ratio) in the reports or in the Reinforced Concrete/element (beam, column...) tab... I don't know if I wanted too much... but these are the requests that I think are essential for now, I'll try to write as much as I can... thank you for your attention .... Good luck...
 
-Mr Mirza; the definition of rigid basement you mentioned, we left the initiative to the engineer because of the uncertainty you mentioned. If you enter the rigid basement floor number in the program, that floor and the floors below it will be treated as a rigid basement floor. Horizontal rigid diaphragms, which consist of floor stiffnesses, automatically detect 6 versions (subtract itself from floor continuity). -We are currently making an arrangement regarding curtains/panels, including the alfas account you want. We can also include the work of introducing the horizontal earth effect you mentioned. - In the next update, the ampatman distribution equipment will become user-defined. -We can add the desired ground stress increase value to be user-defined in the next update. -We are planning to add the balanced reinforcement ratio to the reports as an update in the coming months.
 
When we calculate according to the 50% increased safety stress, the program should also automatically investigate according to the non-earthquake non-increased stress and we should be able to find the unsuitable one. Especially in the 4th and 5th earthquake zones, the situation without an earthquake can often be unsafe.
 
Mr. resignation; The option to increase the soil safety stress by 50% is considered on the basis of the loading combination, if there is no earthquake effect in the loading combination considered, the control is already made according to the unincreased stress (G+Q combination). If you want to control according to non-increased stresses in an earthquake situation, you can cancel it from the project general settings.
 
As far as I know, in version 6, it is possible to effect lateral loads (trapezoidal, singular, triangular...) on columns. It is to prepare parameters and enable us to do this process a little easier... For example, I think it would be more useful if a button containing the floor types and unit volume weights can be added, a button where we can enter the floor height value. .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top