What would you like to have in ideCAD Static?

1.- Designing the building with the retaining wall in a single project and adding the effect of the building effect to the retaining wall and calculating the retaining wall. 2.- Drawing the continuous foundations on different axes in one piece
 
Dear Oznb, the continuous drawing of foundations on different axles was done in version 6.0010.
 
I have examined IDECAD 6 Version a bit and listed the features I want it to have below. 1) Possibility to make double stirrups in columns. 2) In double stirrup beams, there should be a minimum of 4 each of the upper and lower reinforcements and these reinforcements fit on the stirrup corners in the drawing 3) Possibility to make inclined ribs and casters on inclined slabs. 4) When I exported to Sap 2000, I couldn't transfer the tiles (maybe it was my mistake or it wasn't completed yet). 6) Possibility to enter the upper elevation in 2 separate levels, right and left on curtain and retaining walls 7) Ability to narrow or expand the elevations we want on curtains (Example: Thermal Power Plant chimney) 8) Put the apply icon in the object setting dialog box (let's see what happens without closing the dialog box ) 9) Automatically fit the structure to the center of the screen on the 3D screen (Let's choose the place we want to be the center as in 3d max or XSteel). ) If an example project pool is created for the building types that can be done in IDECAD 6, it opens our horizons about what we can do and guides us on how to do it.
 
I don't know if it's been written before, but it wouldn't be bad if the basic stresses are given graphically in the output
 
Mr. Zeki, the floors are a separate shell with their own supports; transferred to SAP as a system. You can import it with Tools->export shell command.
 
"Mr. Zeki, slabs are transferred to SAP as a separate shell system with their own supports. You can transfer them with Tools->export shell command" Thank you for your attention. With the export shell command, tiles can be sent one by one. Buddha takes a long time in a large building. The same is true for raft foundations. I tried as you said, but I could not import and place tiles in the same structure. If you could help with this situation, I would greatly appreciate it. 1) When exporting to SAP, I cannot export single and continuous foundations. Will this be resolved soon? 2) We would be very happy if a macro is prepared for steel projects that calculates welded and bolt connections and anchors. We draw the drawings ourselves, but if you enable us to do the calculations reliably and quickly, we would be very pleased as all engineer friends. and most of us don't need to buy a separate program for steel. Speaking for myself, I'm thinking of getting a program for steel, but if you solve this issue in a short time, you will save me and many friends like me from such a burden. I would be very grateful if you could clarify the issues regarding this and my previous requests. Will the things I want be done in a short time or do we have to wait for a long time? Thanks again and good luck with your work.
 
Mr. Zeki, if you import the slabs one by one to your rod system, you will have to adjust the support conditions for the beams, combine the mesh elements with the rod elements one by one, and define the loads manually, it is not a very practical method. The transfer shell command is designed to transfer slabs with their supports (and raft foundations outer column loads) as a compact system. We continue to work on steel, but it is difficult to give an exact date at this stage. I can only say that you will not wait long in terms of analyzing your steel bar systems in the first place. Your requests in terms of drawing, such as double stirrups and automatic die plan cuts on the columns, will be ready in a few months. (We are currently in a comprehensive study on reinforced concrete drawings).
 
1. Drawing the curtains between the columns, not as independent elements, but as in reality, depending on the columns. 2. Make it easier to adjust the settings that come before importing each drawing in Release 6.001 by making it a table.
 
Adding another column in the beam correction menu, opening the beam and writing the net span will provide comfort in the reinforcement correction. When re-analysis is required, the feature of performing analysis without changing the reinforcement selections should be added. In project solutions such as mosque, vertical vertical beams in the form of arcs should be introduced. In the column reinforcement layout, the reinforcement placement should be intervened, and different stirrups should be selected.
 
In the attached Project, I would like to put inclined floors instead of stairs to see the effect of the stairs on the building. Of the 4 floors between the ED AB axes, the slabs named DS will work as stair landings. i'm glad
 
Solution of beams descending from floor to floor at a certain angle. Showing the curtain reinforcements in the Column application plan, which has been mentioned before. One-piece solution of arc-shaped elements.
 
Is there or will it be possible to form arc-shaped beams horizontally, vertically and both horizontally and vertically (in one piece) in 6 versions? I think there is a lot of demand for this. It is very necessary in mosque-like projects. Also, do you have a chance to convert the file that was solved with ids enterprise 5.511 to work in nc enterprise 5.511, will it take a lot of your time, because I may need this for 1-2 of my files, this will also determine my time to switch to version 6. Good work everyone. .
 
1) I believe that there should be a study on the steel truss roof solution on the reinforced concrete structure, even if it is not comprehensive at first. 2) I would like to improve the quantity format. I think that the footage format does not suit this version at all, even though I am using version 6 right now. For this, I think the quantity should be solved in a separate format from the static reports. Because it is a very good practice that the user cannot intervene in the static report. Of course, the quantity is also ide rpt. When you use the program, the chance to interfere with it disappears. Simple attachments can also be added in the section related to quantity.
 
"mertoni":1h5u56g7" said:
1)I believe that a study should be done on the steel truss roof solution, which is placed on a reinforced concrete structure, even if it is not comprehensive in the first place. 2) I want the quantity format to be improved. I think it doesn't suit the version. .I wish we had the chance to transfer the oska approximate cost of quantity ;) attachments.
Click to expand...
The steel roof solution on a reinforced concrete slab is a very important requirement for me as well, I would like it to be a solution even if it is not a drawing at the first stage. I would also consider purchasing different programs for this. obviously it's passing.
 
I think first of all, a module that calculates the loads coming from the steel system built on the reinforced concrete foundation and automatically applies it to the foundation and solves the foundation system as 3 d should be applied. My suggestion for this can be as follows: A steel analysis module is added for the beginning. It defines the steel system as d, applies the loads and has them analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the loads coming to the foundation are read directly by the ide static. (Prokon can be an example for this). I think this will be enough for the beginning.
 
1- to print out by selecting the floors in the calculation printouts, to print the reinforced concrete calculations of similar floors once.
 
It would be nice to add the calculation of the soil safety stress in idestatistics. Soil safety and settlements need to be calculated with the data taken from the Geological Geophysics reports, you know for every project. In continuous basis and singular foundations, this is very challenging as it has to be done separately for each foundation. This information is in the program, so when we give the soil parameters, the soil safety stresses under each foundation can be calculated easily. As far as I know, there is no such thing in other programs. I also saw that retaining walls were added in version 6. Soil data must be used in the calculation of retaining wall soil loads. There is not much left for the calculation of ground safety. Suat Yıldırım Civil Eng.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top