Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

[gunner]

good day, the following image is formed at some beam junctions in my project. Am I throwing the beams wrong? When I check it with perspective 3d frame, the beams seem to be connected by green arms. Does this affect the results of the analysis?

Could you add the project?

I could not upload the project directly, even though it is 8 mb.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

and is there an error in the project data entry in general? ?

 

[Levent Özpak]

good afternoon in my project, some beam junctions look like this. Am I throwing them wrong? When I check the beams with a perspective 3d frame, the beams seem to be connected by green arms. Does this affect the analysis result?

Hi, it would be appropriate to define the misalignment of the K91 beam from the top so that the joint point does not overlap the beam width of K92. (Same for other beams in a similar situation...) Note: Correct the overlapping object warnings in the geometry control. Good work.

 

[proisa]

Although the building in the project I added is completely symmetrical, why the SG ratio of S03 - S04 columns is so different. I found no errors in my data entry. I will be glad if you review it...

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello, The difference you mentioned is due to the meshing algorithm in the semi-rigid diaphragm solution. You'll see closer results in a fully rigid diaphragm solution. The project has been recorded in our notes for review. Good work

 

[dexana]

hello, first of all, I would like to express how pleased I am with idecad, it provides a lot of convenience for my mansard analysis in the city where I work right now. But I want to share a problem I have. superimposes the expansions of the beams I connected from the inclined column end. I couldn't figure out the reason, there is no problem in the results, even it shows correctly in the reinforcement table given next to the layout, but the drawings are problematic. They come out as they appear in the photos. I would appreciate it if you could explain to me why. good work...

 

[Levent Özpak]

hi, first of all, I would like to express how satisfied I am with idecad, it provides a lot of convenience for my mansard analysis, especially in the city where I work at the moment. However, I would like to share a problem I had. It overlaps the expansions of my beams that I connected from the inclined column end. I couldn't figure it out. There is no problem in the results, even in the reinforcement table given next to the sheet, it shows correctly, but the drawings are problematic. The drawings are as seen in the photos. I would appreciate if you could explain to me why. Good work...

Hello, The situation you are talking about is when the beam is attached to the inclined column in the other direction of the inclination. In order to solve the problem, the relevant beams can be connected to the vertical columns in a new project, the reinforcements can be arranged and the drawing can be taken. These drawings can be transferred to the project with the copy to file and paste from file commands. Good work

 

[dexana]

First of all, thank you for your solution suggestion. I was wondering if I had done such a project before, but this is the first time something like this has happened to me. I wondered if there was a problem with my modeling, I deleted the whole floor and modeled it again, it gave the same result. As a result, I collected and handled the drawings myself. I still don't understand why though

 

[proisa]

Hello. What exactly do I need to write to the filter command in order to list the columns with an SG fraction greater than 1 in the column reinforced concrete dialog?

 

[HakanŞahin]

Hello, what exactly do you need to write in the filter command to list columns with SG percentage greater than 1 in the column reinforced concrete dialog?

You must multiply the percentage value by 10. For example, write the SG percentage value from 1%. to filter out columns with greater than SGPUR>10. To filter columns with SG margin greater than 0.1%: You should write as SGPUR>1 or to filter columns with SG margin equal to 0.02%: SGPUR=0.2.

 

[illaga]

Column axle? Column Dimensions? X and Y directions ? Hello, I have a few questions. 1- For example, the ground floor columns of a project whose project data are entered are desired to be enlarged. How is it possible to enlarge these columns in practice? 2- How can we know the direction verification for Misalignment and Dimensions in the Modify/Column Dimensions window? 3- In the column settings, I set the magnification limits towards the directions where the misalignment of the column is greater. Sometimes I've found that this doesn't work. the reason? 4- Maybe I should have asked in the first place, what do the column axes do? It takes me to the answers to the questions above.

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: Column axle? Column Dimensions? X and Y directions ?

Hi, I have a few questions. 1- For example, the ground floor columns of a project whose project data are entered are desired to be enlarged. How is it possible to enlarge these columns in practice? 2 - How can we know the direction verification for Misalignment and Dimensions in the Modify/Column Dimensions window? 3- In the column settings, I set the magnification limits to the directions where the misalignment of the column is large. Sometimes I saw that this does not work. Why? 4- Maybe I should have asked in the first place, what is the use of column axes? It takes me to answer the questions.

Let's answer from the bottom up: 4.) Column axes are a virtual line that shows the axis set of the column to be used in the growth limits and offset values of the column. If the "Draw column axes" option is selected, an arrow is drawn at the column node. The direction of the arrow is +X. Accordingly, the axis set is determined. When determining the growth directions of the column, you should always look at the +x axis from the bottom to the top. must. The y-axis is the direction perpendicular to it. 3.) It does not hold because you are not looking at the column in the direction of the column axis +x. 2.,1.) You will determine the direction verification by looking at the +x direction from bottom to top. Misalignment X indicates growth in the x direction, Misalignment indicates growth in the Y direction. Always + value is entered. The order of the dimensions does not matter. When you rotate the column during column entry, the column axes will also rotate. When the column axis rotates, the viewing direction of the column axis x axis will also change, so you will need to adjust the misalignment and dimensions accordingly. That's why you asked the questions anyway. For convenience, you can specify the column x-axis to always be in line with the global axes.

 

[NYILMAZ]

Re: Column axle? Column Dimensions? X and Y directions ?

Hi, I have a few questions. 1- For example, the ground floor columns of a project whose project data are entered are desired to be enlarged. How is it possible to enlarge these columns in practice? .......

Practically I recommend using the command "Change/Object edit/column/column dimensions" to change the column dimensions. For example: You can re-enter re-size completely[/u] of selected columns at selected floors (for example 40/40, 25 You can make all columns with /50 etc. 30/60) You can increase or decrease the dimensions of the selected columns at the selected floors (for example, 5 cm) at a certain rate[/ You can increase or decrease offsets of the selected columns at a certain rate (for example, 5 cm) at the selected floors.[/u ] You can invert the dimensions of the selected columns at the selected floors (for example, you can make a 25/50 column 50/25) that was it.

 

[illaga]

Re: Column axle? Column Dimensions? X and Y directions ?

Hi, I have a few questions. 1- For example, the ground floor columns of a project whose project data are entered are desired to be enlarged. How is it possible to enlarge these columns in practice? ........

Practically I recommend using the command "Change/Object edit/column/column dimensions" to change the column dimensions. With this command, you can practically change the dimensions of the columns you choose. For example: You can re-enter the dimensions of the selected columns at the selected floors completely. (for example, you can make all columns with 40/40, 25/50 etc. as 30/60) Change the dimensions of the selected columns on the selected floors at a certain rate (for example 5 cm) you can increase or decrease. You can increase or decrease the offsets of the selected columns at a certain rate (eg 5 cm) at the selected floors. The selected columns at the selected floors you can invert the dimensions invert (for example, you can make a 25/50 column 50/25) I think that's what you were talking about.

Hi, I have a few questions. 1- For example, the ground floor columns of a project whose project data are entered are desired to be enlarged. How is it possible to enlarge these columns in practice? 2- How can we know the direction verification for Misalignment and Dimensions in the Modify/Column Dimensions window? 3- In the column settings, I set the magnification limits towards the directions where the misalignment of the column is greater. Sometimes I've found that this doesn't work. the reason? 4- Maybe I should have asked at the beginning, what do the column axes do? It leads to the answers to the questions above. If the "Draw column axes" option is checked, an arrow is drawn at the column node. The direction the arrow points is the +X direction. Accordingly, the axis set is determined. When determining the growth directions of the column, you should always look at the +x axis from bottom to top. The y-axis is the direction perpendicular to it. 3.) It does not hold because you are not looking at the column in the direction of the column axis +x. 2.,1.) You will determine the direction verification by looking at the +x direction from bottom to top. Misalignment X indicates growth in the x direction, Misalignment indicates growth in the Y direction. Always + value is entered. The order of the dimensions does not matter. When you rotate the column during column entry, the column axes will also rotate. When the column axis rotates, the viewing direction of the column axis x axis will also change, so you will need to adjust the misalignment and dimensions accordingly. That's why you asked the questions anyway. For convenience, you can specify the column x axis to always be in the same direction with respect to the global axes.

Thank you very much for your answers. I think it has been helpful for many people.

 

[gunner]

Hello, I have a raft foundation of approximately 900 m2. I'm having a ground strain problem. (There is no problem when I solve it with the average tension, but there is no problem) I am facing this stress problem under the elevator curtains in the middle of the foundation, with a difference of about 1t/m2. Expanding the raft foundation doesn't help much either. I do not want to put an extra column or curtain into the system and enter a rearrangement. do we have a chance to define the floor under the curtain with springs only in that small area? I think I can overcome this stress problem by using a smaller bearing coefficient for that distressed area. I don't know if I'm wrong. If we have a chance to intervene, how exactly can we do it? The option to add arcs to the nodes from the 3d frame caught my attention. I just don't know how to use it exactly.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[HakanŞahin]

hi, I have a raft foundation of approximately 900 m2. I have a problem of ground tension (when I solve it with average tension, there is no problem only) I am facing this stress problem in the middle of the foundation under the elevator curtains, about 1t With /m2 difference. Expanding the raft foundation doesn't help much either. I don't want to put extra columns or curtains in the system and reorganize it. Is there any chance we can define the floor under the curtain with springs in that small area, by using a smaller bed coefficient for that troubled area? I think I can overcome this stretching problem. I don't know if I'm wrong. If there is a chance to intervene like this, how exactly can we do it? Add springs to nodal points from a 3d frame option caught my attention. I just don't know how to use it exactly.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Hi, Ground suck The case of exceeding the intentional stresses may be as you wrote for seismic combinations due to the 50% increase in the soil safety stress, but the case for g+q vertical loading does not seem as you wrote. Stress is exceeded in a fairly large area. (In 3D frame, examine the ground safety control for g+q loading.) Even if you can provide the ground safety stress in combinations with earthquakes by changing the horizontal coefficient, you will not be able to provide it for vertical loads. As for your question: In the program, it is possible to divide the raft slab with the slab edge into parts, create eyes, and give the bed coefficient multiplier for each eye in the program. (you can see the multiplier value in the raft tile settings). The value you enter will be multiplied by the horizontal coefficient value valid for the entire raft area, which you have given in the project general settings, and will be used in the mentioned raft flooring area. Performing a ground safety check by average is also among your options, but you must convince the inspectors. Otherwise, it seems that you have no choice but to increase the floor area.

 

[gunner]

Thank you very much for your reply sir. By taking the bed coefficient factor of 0.75 (which is the lowest k0 value of my floor as stated in the literature), I remained within the ground safety limits in case of earthquake. As you said, there is still a big problem with g+q installation. I think that only the condition of the ground under vertical loads should be printed on the reports and the user should be warned. This is a very important issue that may be overlooked by many new users like me. I wish you good work.

 

[proisa]

In the project I added, I created the ladder myself. I could not create it properly, I think the support effects are 0 or close to 0. I would be glad if you review it... Good work

 

[Levent Özpak]

I created the ladder myself in the project I added. I couldn't create it properly, I guess, the support effects are 0 or close to 0. I would appreciate it if you could examine it... Good work

It seems that the ladder arms are not attached to the intermediate landing. Note: In the program Reinforcement drawings of straight arm stairs are given automatically. Reinforcement detail drawings of spiral arm stairs are not given automatically. Stair results and reinforcement areas can be viewed in 3D frame mode in the perspective window. Good work

 

[proisa]

Thank you very much for your help....

 

[gunner]

Good day, I can't get the beam expansions in the project I uploaded. The program keeps giving the error that it has stopped working. It is very urgent that this project needs to reach the municipality today. I will update the link soon.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.