Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"aykut_k":36nl048p" said:
can I draw a beam that starts with a large section and ends with a small section? for example, the beam will exit the column as 25/50 and the end will be 25/32
. It used to be like that. console used to be like that. I think you wanted to do that But you can reduce the cross section according to the moment curve by hand. In this case, you can stretch the beam drawing given by the program a little and edit it. At least 2 sections are required...
 
1-What is the purpose of the elevator curtain? 2-Is it appropriate to make "flat reinforcement at the top and bottom" by editing the calculation axis of the floor running console?
 
"izmirlimuhendis":31v6onwn" said:
I have a problem with the project I have attached. I would appreciate your help.
I also do not know your architectural project and obligation, but if I were you, I would make the S13 column like a p3 curtain. your safety tension is very good. Can't you solve it without diagonal foundations? Your concrete quality is also very good (C30) I think you may have made a mistake somewhere.
 
"illaga":3w1h4rj6" said:
1-What is the purpose of the elevator curtain? 2-Is it appropriate to make "flat reinforcement at the top and bottom" by editing the calculation axis of the console running floor?
1- In general, the elevator rails should be placed properly and I can express it as fixing the elevator.If it is at a suitable point in your project, you can use it as a rigidity-increasing element. 2- You can edit the working style of the slab and the type of reinforcement by using the edit / command of the slab/reinforced concrete calculation axis.
 
"NYILMAZ":kavo4ik5" said:
"izmirlimuhendis":kavo4ik5" said:
I have a problem in the project I have attached. I will be glad if you help.
Also, I don't know your architectural project and your obligation, but if I were you, I would make the S13 column like a p3 curtain. I would also remove column S14. Your ground safety tension is very good. Can't solve without doing the diagonal foundations? Try to make your beams the same size if it's not too much of a problem. I suggest you check your loads as well. Some of your beams and floors have loads of 1 tonne. In general, your column and beam sections are large. Unnecessary thickness on your floors gives weight to the system. Your concrete quality is also very good (C30) I think you may have made a mistake somewhere.
Thank you for your advice. We talked to the architect and decided to remove the S14 column. The fact that there is a load of 1 ton on the floors is due to the fact that this place is a factory. A factory with 5 floors. Column and beam sizes are therefore a bit large.
 
have a nice day. I'm having trouble with the ground safety tension in the project I uploaded. I have a chance to expand the foundation from facades that are only curtains. Even though I got a 3 meter console, I couldn't get over this problem. when I solve for mean stress, it's mean. Strange values like F999/20 came out even though the tensile was 21.03tf/m2, the floor was 30tf/m2. on the reinforced concrete>radial flooring tab. as a last resort. the basis that I will try to design according to stress I would be very happy if you could help me out.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"gunner":23o3l2dm" said:
good day. I'm having trouble with the ground safety tension in the project I've loaded. I have the chance to expand the foundation only from the facades that are shear walls. I couldn't get over this problem even though I had a 3 meter console. Although the floor is tf/m2, the floor is 30tf/m2, strange values such as F999/20 are found. In the reinforced concrete> raft slab tab, I will try to design the foundation according to the average stress as a last resort. Apart from that, I would be very grateful if you could help me.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You chose a pleated design for the 1st beams, but you didn't choose a pillar as the reinforcement. In the raft flooring section, you choose a reinforcement for the pile, the problem is solved
 
LICENSEE Is it possible to remove the license owner's name from idecad report printouts? Keep the License Number but the name cannot be deleted?
 
"mhanifiata":1zcholh6" said:
"illaga":1zcholh6" said:
"saridurmus":1zcholh6" said:
Why do you make such a request.
As you know, for contract drawings..[/quote ] ONLY THE LICENSE NUMBER IS WRITTEN ON THE REPORT OF VERSION 7. NO COMPANY NAME/INFORMATION...
Hello, Mr. Hanifi, There is a company name and/or user name on the lock. There may be a problem with your lock. You can send your lock to us and we can fix the problem.
 
Console reinforcements Console reinforcement is placed on the 1-console balcony floors, but the way it works seems to be bidirectional. Is there a bug in the program? Console systems work in one direction. 2- I have asked before; For example, let it be found that the thickness of the balcony slab, which is 2.00 m cantilever, is insufficient when inspected according to ln/12. It provides thickness when I make flat reinforcement at the bottom and top of the reinforcement type without increasing the thickness. Could this be a solution?
 
report output problem I would be glad if you could help me. I create a report after drawing the static project, but I cannot convert this report to pdf or word, so what should I do to transfer it to a usb flash and print it out.
 
Re: report output problem
"gripin":cuzp39ag" said:
friends, I would appreciate if you could help. I am creating a report after drawing the static project, but I cannot convert this report to pdf or word, so transfer it to a usb flash and print it out. Thank you.
You can select the report as a pdf document by clicking the Save As line from the File menu.
 
Re: Console reinforcements
"illaga":knnlgtaa" said:
1- console reinforcement is placed on the balcony floors, but the way it works seems to be bidirectional.Is there a bug in the program? Console systems work in one direction .
In the program, the working type of the reinforcement axles is determined according to the calculation openings and the support conditions of the slab. The working type does not affect the analysis results. The working type of the slab can be changed with the Reinforced Concrete Calculation Axis Edit command.
"illaga":knnlgtaa" said:
2- Previously I also asked; For example, let it be found that the thickness of the balcony slab, which is 2.00 m cantilever, is insufficient when inspected according to ln/12. It provides thickness when I make flat reinforcement at the bottom and top of the reinforcement type without increasing the thickness. Could this be a solution?
You should decide this according to the condition of the support edges of the slab. In the program, slab thickness control is done according to the reinforcement type. When the reinforcement type is cantilever, the thickness control is made according to Ln/12, while when the reinforcement type is selected at the top + flat reinforcement at the bottom, it is made according to Ln/25. For example, I think it would be correct to make the thickness control according to Ln/12 in a slab that is supported on one side only and the other sides are empty.
 
hello, I solved a simple frame system using a raft foundation that I created with the slab edges, no problem. when I solved the same frame using a rafter raft, all values were "0" in the ground stress control. Where could I be doing wrong? Also, why do I need to pass beams under all columns for rafter raft application? What would I be ignoring if I defined a raft laying only between the foundation beams surrounding the outer columns? What are the differences in the raft base report? In which part of the main report can I address these differences? As someone who has just started using idecad, I would like to thank you in advance for your answers.
 
Back
Top