Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

While making your projects, I recommend you to check the geometry and take into account what is said as a result of this check. Beam particle remained in the area of S003 column on A - 3 axis. I think this is the main reason why you can't get beam detail. In addition, I would like to write about 1-2 issues by the way: 1-I am sending your project as an attachment. Your project size is 1.5 mb . whereas the one you sent was over 50mb. This was because there were a large amount of 2d objects (drawings) in the closed layers that were not relevant to this project. I deleted those and also deleted the unused layers. Your project has reached around 1.5 mb. 2-In your project, the slab edge and the beam overlap. So they're exactly tangent to each other. (beam k023) You should correct this error. Make such spaces using the "tile space" command. 3 - Another mistake you made at the same point is that the ribs were cut with such gaps. Your 4 ribs are twisting at idle. You should definitely close it with a beam. 4- I don't know what the console you made on the top floor means. But do not design a beam console from beam, whatever that means. This is not in line with your regulations. If you need it badly, lay cantilever slabs on that spot. 5- I do not know the architectural requirements, but if I were you, I would take care not to make the outer beams horizontal as much as possible, thus making the system more rigid. I hope what I wrote worked for you.
 
Dear nyılmaz, thank you for your reply. Since it is not a very complex system anyway, I rebuilt the project. this way, I was able to get the beam expansions. The reason why I used the tile line instead of the tile gap was that the ribs continued despite the gap. As you said, I had to cross it with beams. I skipped that. The reason for the console on the mezzanine floor is that the building to be constructed with dilatation right next to it is coming out. As you said, it might be more appropriate for it to be a console plate. Thank you very much for your advice. Apart from these, there is a situation I would like to ask about the reports. In the structure summary report, under the title of determining the earthquake load, ux, uy, or rz are written in parentheses on the line containing the natural vibration period of the building. How is this determined? Why is T determined by Uy and not by displacement in the x direction?
 
"gunner":gp86hk86" said:
there is something else I would like to ask about the reports. In the building summary report, in the title of determining the earthquake load, in the line where the natural vibration period of the building is located, ux, uy, or rz are written in parentheses. T is determined according to uy instead of displacement in x direction ?
Click to expand...
The biggest period in the building (1st mode) is determined as the Natural Vibration Period of the Building. The name of the direction is written in which direction the effective mass in this mode is. ux: x direction uy : y direction rz: torsion
 
When we install the new version, a warning appears that the lock system is old and the program does not work. I will be glad if you help
 
"baskutay":1vco1njd" said:
when we install the new version, a warning appears that the lock system is old and the program does not work. I would appreciate your help
Click to expand...
1) Open the Windows "Run" command. Type the following command from the ideCAD program folder. 2) " C:\Program Files\ideCAD\ideCAD Static 7\Drivers\install\haspdinst.exe" -r -fr -kp -purge -v 3) This command will delete all key drivers from the computer 4) Disable virus program or security program if any Leave it or unsafe "haspdinst.exe" 5) Restart the computer 6) Reinstall the lock driver by typing the following command 7) "C:\Program Files\ideCAD\ideCAD Static 7\Drivers\install\haspdinst.exe " -i -kp -v 8) Enable the virus program. 9) Restart the computer and run the program.
 
How can I fix the ground safety negative error on the raft foundation, friends... you can download and review the project below
 
"tedarmi":1loc4tvq" said:
how can I fix the ground safety negative error in the raft foundation, friends...you can download and review the project below
Click to expand...
I think you made a data entry error. Your ground safety stress will be 19 t/m2, not 1.9. It cannot be 1.9.
 
My foundation system is continuous foundation..After analysis Max. Soil stress values appear to be zero except for a few foundations. What is the reason for showing zero?
 
"illaga":jynkcof6" said:
My foundation system is continuous foundation..After the analysis, Max. Soil stress values in the Reinforced Concrete/Continuous foundation dialog show zero except for a few foundations. What is the reason for showing zero.
Click to expand...
Could you add your project?
 
"illaga":2nnya9yx" said:
My foundation system is continuous foundation..After the analysis, Max. Soil stress values in Reinforced Concrete/Continuous foundation dialog show zero except for a few foundations. Continuous Foundation joint points may not be on the columns, the foundation part may remain under the column object, etc...
Click to expand...
 
friends, can I have your opinions about this project.. I also took a photo of a staircase, how can I draw it? can you help me?
 
In the project I sent in the example, why doesn't it draw between the two curtains in the beam expansions constantly? ? What do I need to do to draw the beams continuously?
 
In TDY 2007, the transition condition of beam longitudinal reinforcements into shear walls was determined as 50fi and Lb. Since the longitudinal reinforcements of the beams coming into the curtain from the left and the right do not meet each other, the beam openings were designed in this way.
 
In my project, I defined the 1st floor after the ground floor as the gallery floor. When the gallery is drawing from the floor, for example, the pose numbers on the beams appear as K101. How can I get it as KG01?
 
You can set the floor index from the Analysis / Floor parameters / index line in the table. Simply enter the letter "G" for that floor.
 
"tedarmi":1a3695k8" said:
GIVES AN INTERESTING DRAWING THAT I DRAW THE COLUMN APPLICATION IN THE FOLLOWING PROJECT HOW CAN I CORRECT IT CAN YOU SEE FRIENDS
Click to expand...
I think you are talking about a S08 polygon column here because its details are prepared according to the reinforcement plan in 120 scale. There are no anomalies.You can also edit the details of stirrups and crossties by using the Draw/Reinforcement/Stirrup-Stickers commands.If you want the middle part of the column to be equipped like a curtain, you can enter a panel object between two columns.
 
"tedarmi":2gsyvt5i" said:
THE TEACHER I DID AS YOU SAID IT NOW IT STARTED TO GIVE DIFFERENT ERRORS CAN YOU EXPLORE
Click to expand...
Floor edge is drawn under the K19-k17 beams in the basement. Therefore, it gives more than one rigid diaphragm warning. Due to the remaining slab edges, the raft slab boundaries are formed incorrectly.The continuity of rib calculation beams is not defined correctly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top