Opinions questions about using ideCAD Static 7

"haliltek":13r5f8zn" said:
Hi ; In the fuel tank tank I sent the picture of, the horizontal reinforcement of the curtain P01 and P02, which is divided by the column, is cut inside the column. The horizontal reinforcement of the curtain P103 and P104 continues continuously. I can't understand the different detailing of the same curtains, am I making a mistake? Should I make the change manually? I am sending the project as well. I wish you the best of luck...
Hello, check the "Automatically decide according to geometry" option in the settings of the P02 curtain. Checked in other panels , was not checked in panel P02. Project attached...
 
How should we change our design by looking at the -top floor object -Ndmin <0.1Acfck expressions in the control column of the strong column report section, because apart from these, the OK sign is used for others...
 
According to the regulation, this control is not required for columns that do not continue to the upper floor or have nd < 0.1*Ac*fck (with less normal force). Examine the relevant article(3.3.5.4). So you don't need to change your project.
 
"Admin":2w15uakm" said:
According to the regulation, this control is not necessary for columns that do not continue to the upper floor or have nd < 0.1*Ac*fck (with little normal force). you don't need to change it.
THANKS...
 
Hello, as seen in the picture, 2 basement floors are modeled as 3 sides curtain and 1 side beam as in the figure. and in the analysis settings, both basement floors were accepted as rigid in both directions and the rigid basement floor number was taken as -1. How do you think it should be? Is it correct the way I did it in both directions?
 
I want to solve the project I'm working on right now as a semi-rigid diaphragm, but the program does not analyze the project due to geometry errors during analysis. The geometry error is that the wall length is less than 7 times the wall thickness, will I not be able to analyze this project as a semi-rigid diaphragm?
 
"nahroyo":tplbr9ge" said:
I want to solve the project I am working on as a semi-rigid diaphragm, but the program does not analyze the project due to geometry errors during the analysis. The geometry error is that the wall length is less than 7 times the wall thickness. Can't I?
After the message Merhabi Analysis cannot be solved, the program gives the coordinate information about the problematic joint point. You can find that element by following the information. Generally, such a problem occurs due to the presence of a small element. If you can't find the problem, you add the project.
 
"oyuxel":2k8bhogc" said:
Hi, as seen in the picture, 2 basement floors are modeled as 3 sides curtains and 1 side beam as shown in the figure. And in the analysis settings, both basement floors are considered as rigid in both directions and the rigid basement floor number is -1. How do you think it should be? Is it right the way I did it in both directions?
 
"nahroyo":1570iycg" said:
I want to solve the project I am working on right now as a semi-rigid diaphragm, but the program does not analyze the project due to geometry errors during the analysis. The geometry error is that the curtain length is less than 7 times the wall thickness, as a semi-rigid diaphragm of this project. Can't I do the analysis?
The reason for not being able to analyze your project is not due to errors in the length of the curtain wall. There may be problems with the column beam connection points or a problem with the floors. Check the geometry again while all options are checked. Especially for short objects, beams and slab edges should be checked. Incorrect Column beam intersections should be checked.You should switch to 3D Frame mode using the Right-click menu on the perspective screen and examine the model in the Structure view.If you cannot fix the problem, you can add your project.
 
"YasinTezel":32m47iiz" said:
"nahroyo":32m47iiz" said:
I want to solve the project I am currently working on as a semi-rigid diaphragm, but the program does not analyze the project due to geometry errors during analysis. the geometry error is that the wall length is less than 7 times the wall thickness, will I not be able to analyze this project as a semi-rigid diaphragm?
The reason for not being able to analyze your project is not due to the errors related to the wall length. There may be problems in the column beam connection points or a problem with the floors. Do the geometry check again with all options checked. Especially short objects, beams and slab edges should be checked. Incorrect column beam intersections should be checked. On the perspective screen, using the Right-click menu, switch to 3D Frame mode and examine the model in Structure view. If you can't fix the problem, you can add your project.
"YasinTezel":32m47iiz" said:
"nahroyo":32m47iiz" said:
I want to solve the project I am currently working on as a semi-rigid diaphragm, but the program does not analyze the project due to geometry errors during analysis. . the geometry error is that the wall length is less than 7 times the wall thickness, will I not be able to analyze this project as a semi-rigid diaphragm?
The reason for not being able to analyze your project is not due to the errors related to the wall length. There may be problems in the column beam connection points or a problem with the floors. Do the geometry check again with all options checked. Especially short objects, beams and slab edges should be checked. Incorrect column beam intersections should be checked. On the perspective screen, using the Right-click menu, switch to 3D Frame mode and examine the model in Structure view. If you can't fix the problem, you can add your project.
There is no geometry error in the project other than the geometry error related to the screen... I turned the computer off and on, the analysis was done, but it takes too long, it analyzes for about half an hour, is this normal?
 
It is normal for a solution with a semi-rigid diaphragm (in which floors are included in the analysis model) to a solution with a rigid diaphragm model (slabs not in the analysis model). However, I would expect the analysis of your 6-floor project to be completed in about 10 minutes on an up-to-date computer. What is your computer configuration (processor and RAM)?
 
"Admin":1dp4g1ey" said:
It is normal for a solution with a semi-rigid diaphragm (in which floors are included in the analysis model) to a solution with a rigid diaphragm model (slabs are not in the analysis model). What is your computer configuration (processor and RAM)?
SO MUCH ANALYSIS IS INTERRUPTED AGAIN... 4GB RAM - CORE I5 PROCESSOR
 
"oyuxel":2qka2wsc" said:
Hi, as shown in the picture, 2 basement floors are modeled as 3 sides curtains and 1 side beam as shown in the figure. In the analysis settings, both basement floors are considered rigid in both directions and the rigid basement floor number is -1. How do you think it should be?Is it correct the way I did it in both directions?
As far as I understand from the screenshots you posted, there is a rigid basement in one direction and a basement screen on only one side in the other direction. You can enter data.You can edit the rigid basement number according to the floor number equivalent of the floor in general.
 
"HakanŞahin":2xoxoeib" said:
"nahroyo":2xoxoeib" said:
Unfortunately, ANALYSIS IS INTERRUPTED AGAIN... 4GB RAM - CORE I5 PROCESSOR
If you add the project, we can look at the problem on our own computers...
project size too high can't post
 
good day to all of you first of all; today I entered a project in ide version 7.015 and after entering it, I solved the project as a semi-rigid diaphragm. When I look at the basic results, I see the ground stresses as 0, I wonder what could be the reason for this? Is it a program error or is it because I entered it wrong.
 
The program does not pay attention to the wall loads we have defined on the hollow block floor, what kind of solution do you suggest we do for this?
 
Back
Top