The licensed program cannot be used as a demo. It works with program lock."alpaydinism":7e9gqv51" said:Can we use it as a demo when we download it?
Hello, Dynamic mass between versions There may be changes in the modeling and modal analysis algorithm.The order of the calculated modes may change, especially in modes close to each other, but mainly the contribution of the relevant mode and the result of this contribution CQC b The combined values are important. If you send the project that brings out the situation you mentioned, we can examine it in more detail. Good work"karsaf":153zbm69" said:Hi ; First of all, I would like to say that I really like the v10.20 version. Thanks to everyone who contributed I recently started using the 10.20 version to finalize the projects I designed with 10.17. However, one of the issues I paid particular attention to during the design phase is the absence of the first 2 modes (RZ) in the "detailed dynamic analysis report". Like (Ux)(Uy), there are situations like (Rz)(Uy) in version 10.20. I wonder what could be the reason for this, I made a special development about it. Thank you. Good work..
"Levent Özpak":2sz1utmr" said:Hello, There may be changes in dynamic mass modeling and modal analysis algorithm between versions. The order of the calculated modes may vary, especially in modes close to each other, but the contribution of the relevant mode and the resulting CQC combined values are more important than the order. If you send the project that brings out the situation you mentioned, we can examine it in more detail. Good work"karsaf":2sz1utmr" said:Hello ; First of all, I would like to say that I really like the v10.20 version. Thanks to everyone who contributed. I recently started using the 10.20 version to finalize the projects that I had designed with 10.17. but one of the issues that I paid particular attention to during the design phase is the absence of the first 2 modes (RZ) in the "detailed dynamic analysis report". While most of my projects designed in 10.17 version are (Ux)(Uy) as below, in 10.20 version (Rz)(Uy) occurs. What could be the reason for this, I wonder if I made a special development about it. Thank you. Good work..
"karsaf":2yccx1to" said:https://wetransfer.com/downloads/5187621c7fe8e2e3c4a92afd89928d182010084504 link/7adekli this Mr. Levent. The reason is that the first mode is neither exactly torsion in the X direction nor exactly. We recommend that you examine the "Mass Participation Rates" reports. (In the detailed Dynamic analysis report, the one that gives the lowest mass participation in the 4 modal analysis report is b. It can only be a guide for you to get a rough idea since their interests are published.) Good work
The proposal project is attached. Ünver ÖZCAN"mehmetyks":1gzhx6aq" said:I am getting double reinforcement error in the attached project, I couldn't fix it no matter what I did. also r=r should be taken It says to remove the option 4/5. If I have a deficiency in the project, I would appreciate it if you could let me know and help
Hello, in the attached project, the slab on which I had a double reinforcement error on the landing level was removed. I need to put plumbing flooring in that part"unver":1wtlg3j3" said:HiThe proposal project is attached. Ünver ÖZCAN"mehmetyks":1wtlg3j3" said:Double reinforcement error in attached project I can't fix it no matter what I did. it also says r=r should be taken, remove the 4/5 option. If I have a shortcoming in the project, I would appreciate it if you could let me know and help
"S.Onur":2qkjw4vr" said:Is there a demo version of version 10.20? If so, how can we get it?[ /quote] Demo version 10.20 has not been released yet, you can use 10.14 for now.
Hi, Distance between columns in raft base thickness control. (Ln/30)."nitasltd":227wkrm1" said:Hi, after the analysis in my project it gives an error of insufficient slab thickness for the foundation, although it does not give a punching error on the base? url=https://dosya.co/rtor0nzl33w8/1.cde.html]https://dosya.co/rtor0nzl33w8/1.cde.html[/url]
Thank you. Also, in the projects I solved with the old version, for example, the reinforcements on the 25/175 curtain heads were decreasing as the floor went up. Likewise, the project that I solved in the new version continues in the same way without decreasing. Shouldn't the reinforcement ratio decrease as the moments decrease?"Levent Özpak":u2a2r6tc" said:Hi, Raft is between columns in base thickness control distance (Ln/30) is checked. In cases where there is no column in the raft, the raft opening is taken into account in the thickness control. If the thickness is sufficient, you can interfere with the "Reinforced Concrete Calculation Axis Edit" command to the line of the reinforcement axles -clear clearance for thickness control-. Good work"nitasltd":u2a2r6tc" said:Hi, slab thickness for foundation although it did not give a punching error after analysis in my project gives an insufficient error? What could be the reason for this?You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish