Advice about the project

"unver":2g35xdvs" said:
Hello
"engineer":2g35xdvs" said:
Unver, could you please take a look at my post?
The proposal project is attached. In this case, you need to put punching reinforcement on the raft foundation or increase the thickness of the raft. This will be your choice. Ünver ÖZCAN
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Thank you very much :)
 
"unver":o1itaul5" said:
Hello
"muhendise":o1itaul5" said:
Unver, could you please take a look at my post?
The proposal project is attached. In this case, you need to put punching reinforcement on the raft foundation or increase the thickness of the raft. This will be your choice. Ünver ÖZCAN
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Unver, I'm sorry to bother you again, I'm sorry, I looked at the project first, thank you . I did not understand how you fixed the relative story drift error, I entered the column system you uploaded in the first version I uploaded the project here. Error B is completely gone, but the relative story drift error is still present. and in which cases we should choose dynamic eccentricity. Please don't get me wrong, my aim is to get one step closer to making an error-free project by just learning about my mistakes.
 
Re: RELATIVE STORY DEFERENCE AND WEAK FLOOR PROBLEM
"mühendise":1324hczh" said:
Hello, I could not solve the relative storey drift problem, I did c30, I enlarged the section, I added a curtain, could you take a look, I added a link
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
[ /quote] Hello, Because your project has a very weak ground such as Ground class ZE, the relative floor drift values are high. You can check the link below for the relative floor drift problem and possible solutions.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
- TBDY 2018 Article 7.5 with regard to Joint Interrupt Security problem(B) and Frequently asked questions and answers document item 9.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Column S05 in the project, which gives a Join break safety warning K25-K26 beams connected in the Y direction have no common intersection area. Consider the option of not resolving these two beams continuously. (In the "Rebars" tab of the properties of the K25 beam, the line "Continuously accept beam at the right end" can be unchecked) -For raft foundation punching problems and possible solutions, you can check the link below.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Good studies
 
Slab reinforcement and column-beam junction security problem Hello, in my project, DZ02 slab gives insufficient reinforcement error. When I increase reinforcement, too many reinforcement drawings occur. Is there an error in the data entry, I could not fix it, column-beam junction security problem cannot be overcome, columns are too large I would appreciate if you can help, thanks in advance and keep up the good work.
 
Re: Slab reinforcement and column beam connection security problem
"sara":j3h5jdb6" said:
Hi, DZ02 slab gives insufficient reinforcement error in my project. When I increase reinforcement, too many reinforcement drawings occur. Is there an error in the data entry? I couldn't fix it, column-beam junction safety problem cannot be overcome. Columns are getting too big. I would appreciate your help, thanks in advance and good work.
Hello, -In your project, the analysis model is incorrect because the lower stair arm is not supported on the foundation on the ground floor. In order to support the lower edge of the stair to the foundation, the sub-basement You can enter a basement wall to which the lower edge can be connected to the basement floor. The same situation applies to the lower edges of the stairs in the basement floor. Also, when determining the support conditions for the solution together with the building, it should be determined that the edge of the stairs is connected to whichever element is supported, other carrier elements should be left blank. TBDY on security issue You can review article 7.5 of 2018 and article 9 of Frequently Asked Questions and Answers document.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Note: Since there is no diaphragm (floor) in the basement floor, it would be appropriate not to accept the floor as rigid. Good work
 
I wish you a good day... When I save and exit my project, which was not a problem yesterday, when I open and analyze it today, I get the warning of lack of reinforcement on all my cassette floors. What could be the reason for this? my project size is quite big so uploading it was a problem. That's why I was able to send a picture...
 
Let me also point this out. I ran into this end when I saved the project and reopened it after reverting to the scaffolding project.
 
"hkaragoz":dblrobld" said:
I wish you a good day... When I save and exit my project, which was fine yesterday, when I open it and analyze it today, I get the warning that all my cassette tiles are missing reinforcement. That's why I was able to send a picture...
"hkaragoz":dblrobld" said:
Let me also mention this. I encountered this when I saved the project and reopened it after it was converted to a scaffolding project.
Hello, IdeCAd project file wetransfer etc. You can upload it to the site and give the link. Good work
 
"Levent Özpak":1a0e17m2" said:
"hkaragoz":1a0e17m2" said:
I wish you a good day... When I saved and exited my project, which had no problems yesterday, and opened and analyzed it today, I get the warning of lack of reinforcement on all my cassette tiles. What could be the reason for this? my project size is quite big so uploading it was a problem. For this reason, I was able to send a picture...
"hkaragoz":1a0e17m2" said:
Let me also point out that when I saved the project and reopened it after it was converted to a scaffolding project, I encountered this problem. You can upload it and give the link. Good work
good work...
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello, In the project you added, an empty installation combination named 1.4G+1.6Q+ 1.6H but no installation is selected has been defined. Deleting this loading combination will fix the problem with cassette tiles. To delete the combination, select the relevant combination in the Structure tree, press the right button and click the "Delete" line from the pop-up menu. Good work
 
"Levent Özpak":12hfo9ru" said:
Hi, In the project you added, an empty loading combination named 1.4G+1.6Q+ 1.6H but no loading is selected. Deleting this loading combination will fix the problem with cassette tiles. select the combination and press the right button and click the "Delete" line from the menu that opens. Good work
Thank you very much. I never thought it would be from this combination. Good work...
 
"mehdiduman":3iawto3p" said:
hi everyone. how should we read values with different colors and tones. normal, blue, orange???
Hello, black(normal) colored values are not increased Values in Orange(tile color) show the nib forces that have been applied, therefore modified and lead to the design. Values used are also shown in bold. Values written in blue These are the values of the design (design) loading that subtracts the most unsuitable reinforcement area used in longitudinal reinforcement calculation.
 
SAMPLE Could you share your comments and suggestions about the basic design in the attached sample project? Good work...
 
Re: EXAMPLE Hello, There are continuous foundation parts in the raft in your project that are not attached to the carrier elements. If you want to define a raft foundation in the elevator area, you can define a continuous foundation under the elevator curtains so that the joint points coincide with the curtain joint points, and you can define the middle raft foundation. Note: Make data entry with the main nodes on the column. For example, the right end of the TK36 continuous foundation and the left end of the TK37 are not connected to the S10 column. Good work
 
"legend":2ggpolma" said:
hello. It gives this error when saving and closing. What is the problem.?
Hello, -Close the program. -Delete the C:\Programdadata\ideCAD10 folder.(If you can't see the ProgramData folder, it's in the hidden location. You can make it visible by checking the "Show hidden files and folders" option in the "Folder and Search options" section.) - Press and hold the Ctrl and Shift keys on the left side of the keyboard at the same time. - Run the program shortcut by double clicking on the desktop. Do not release the Ctrl and Shift keys until the "Registered) login and settings are cleared" warning appears. (The warning may also stay in the background) -Click OK on the warning that comes up. -Try again. Good work
 
Back
Top