ideCAD 6.01 Released. Download , try , give feedback .

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can model both situations with ideCAD. 1) If you want to model your curtain as a bar, you enter it with the index S. 2) If you want to model your curtain as a shell, you can enter it as a panel 3) If you want to model your curtain as a bar, you can also model the curtain you entered as a panel. Modelling multi-armed polygon curtains as a single element is the worst possible mistake. It is necessary to model these curtains as shells and to examine the shear force and moment in each arm separately. This can only be achieved by modeling the curtains as shells. The opinions of institutions related to this subject are of course important, but the point that should be taken into account is the opinions of universities and chambers.
 
"mhanifiata":ouhogvar" said:
some institutions did not accept the normal curtain situation in the past and asked us to enter the curtains that continue throughout the whole building as column elements. They only considered the perimeter curtains that form a rigid basement as panel elements. It's more correct to introduce it as an object. There is no difference other than a slight change. Both are modeled as a rod element with the rigidity of its own physical cross section during the analysis. What do you mean by fragmentation in the drawing?
 
"Admin":3kfb3hlw" said:
"mhanifiata":3kfb3hlw" said:
some institutions did not accept the normal curtain situation in the past and asked us to enter the curtains that continue throughout the whole building as column elements. only the perimeter curtains forming a rigid basement were considered as panel elements. maybe it would be more correct to introduce curtains as a panel object. but its fragmentation (as noun) in the drawing bothers me.
If you model it as a rod, there is no difference between entering the curtain as a column (single-node) or a panel element (two-node) except for a slight change in the transfer of slab loads to the panel it doesn't happen. Both are modeled as a bar element with the rigidity of its physical cross section during analysis. What do you mean by not falling apart in the drawing?
In the screenshot I put as jpeg, the name shape of the curtain is clearly seen. The same goes for the beams. both when dividing by the slab edge and dividing by the beam. This causes the image to be too crowded. I hope I explained it fully this time.
 
Mrs. Wish, the presentation about the land was very nice, thank you. Thanks to this introduction, we fully understood terrain modeling. however, the excavation amount of the land I defined in the attached file is different each time I trench. I would appreciate it if you could check and help me.
 
Although this division visually complicates the drawing screen, this element (multi-part) is considered as a single element in terms of analysis, regulation checks, drawing and report. So there is no difference between being fragmented and being single. On the other hand, we have made an improvement for the next version (Beta2) to make the split panel/beams look better cosmetically, you can check the attached screenshot.
 
Hello, this is a problem we detect when we draw a space within a space. You will see that it is fixed when the partner deletes the smallest gap. This bug will be fixed in the next update. Sincerely,
"mhanifiata":1lkxtpn1" said:
arzu lady, the introduction about the land was very nice, thank you. Thanks to this introduction, we fully understood the land modeling. However, the excavation amount of the land I defined in the attached file is different every time I open it. I would appreciate it if you would.
 
"Admin":22wv4j7m" said:
"Bolvadinim":22wv4j7m" said:
IdeCAD Architecture 6.01 When will it be available?
We will make the architecture available after the holidays.
Thanks for the information,
" Admin":22wv4j7m" said:
On the other hand, we made an improvement for the next version (Beta2) to make the segmented panels/beams look more cosmetically beautiful.
Also, the visual beauty of the program "cosmetically" aestheticized in terms of project presentation in all drawings and details. It will be very beneficial in terms of appealing to the eye. As a three-dimensional system, which is the product of both the Architecture and the Static program, very good results can be obtained with the visual beauty and the creative and impressive layout designs of the user in parallel with them. I experienced the change and development with great pleasure when I took it to the visa. I believe that it is doing the necessary work to raise IdeYAPI to higher standards, taking into account the possibilities and possibilities of the programs... I would like to commend and thank everyone who contributed to the whole İdeYAPI community. ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE
 
Hi insmuh_gk, you can make a slope by activating the "level up from the land" option in the terrain properties of the program, drawing a plateau on the land, and deactivating the option to level up from the land inside this plateau and drawing a second plateau at (-) elevation values. Best Regards,
"insmuh_gk":1tyyxt29" said:
Ms. Arzu, thank you very much, the training videos you have prepared with a lot of effort are very nice, I ALSO THANK YOU TO THE IDE TEAM, WHO UPGRADED THE PROGRAM'S CAPABILITY SO MUCH. Do we have the opportunity to give slopes?
 
Thank you Mr. "Bolvadinim" for your good wishes. We would like to thank all of our users who supported the development of the program with suggestions. As the ideYAPI family, we congratulate all our users and everyone who follows the forum, and wish you a happy holiday.
"Bolvadinim":3dcspxup" said:
[I would like to appreciate and thank everyone in the IdeYAPI community for their efforts.. I wish all ideYAPI Users and their team a happy Eid-al-Adha, and a happy holiday.. DABANLIOĞLU ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE
 
Hello, first of all, the features you have added to the program are extremely nice and worthy of appreciation. I would like to point out what I came across at my first glance. The program closes when I want to enter the pile foundation. Sheathing detail on the column does not draw in the column application plan.
 
If you hold down the ctrl+shift keys while opening the program, the settings will be reset and there will be no problem.
"Levent Özpak":3emi3opb" said:
"saridurmus":3emi3opb" said:
I also tried it and as my brother siromar said, when I clicked on the additive foundation icon, it turned itself off.
Hello, Can you run the program by holding down the Ctrl+Shift key on the left side of the keyboard to solve the problem? In this case, you will see a message stating that the Registry entry and settings have been cleared. Click OK and continue. I think you can enter a pile foundation when you run the program this way. You only need to do this once when you run the 6.01 program for the first time. Good work
 
Mr. Levent, Yes, I opened the program with the ctrl+shiht key and did the reset. I have defined the pile foundation and soil layer. At this time, the program is interrupted during the pile foundation analysis.
 
If you add your project that caused the program to break during the pile foundation analysis, I can take a look. If you save the project in cde format by compressing it will take up much less space.
 
Re: The problem of connecting the beams to the curtains Greetings, when we created the stepped foundation system, there are very few deficiencies in the concrete part of the basement curtains and basement curtains drawing, but there are many deficiencies in the reinforcement drawings. good work.
 
This is the situation when the elevation of the dome is given at floor height, it looks normal in the 3d frame when given at the building height, but rises in the solid model.
 
How to define the basement curtain in ide 6.01. How to add columnar sprouts that come out of the foundation in the basement. Currently, the program draws the length of the sprout that comes out of the foundation. The height of the basement is entered incompletely. How to define the basement curtains.
 
Dear forum users, instead of stating your questions about the use of 6.01 under this heading, we kindly ask you to write them under the heading "about the use of 6.01" on the main page of the form or, if there is a new topic, under the relevant topic that we will open in the forum. Similarly, just write down the problems and glitches you have identified regarding our 6.01 BETA 1 version under this title... Thank you for your attention.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top