CUTTING SAFETY in the Beam Incoming to the Elevator Curtain and MAX. PURS

I

izmirli_35_35

New Member
K ON BEAM K54 on the 1st Floor: The beam does not provide shear safety. M: The maximum market value is exceeded. ro= As / [b.(h-pp)] > romax . ***I am facing problems. I couldn't solve this problem. Can you help me? Also, how necessary is it that we attach beams to these curtains in order to distribute the stiffness of the curtains? ***Do you have any advice on the formwork plan in general, please? THANKS FOR YOUR HELP...
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: CUTTING SECURITY AND MAX. I recommend that you reconsider the carrier system. As can be seen in the lines marked in red, none of the frames on all four sides of the building are complete. The carrier system design in the corners as balconies is also not very meaningful. Besides, the core in the middle is full of studs. I would not recommend modeling your stairs as flooring. Make a semi-rigid diaphragm solution with the system using the ladder command. In addition, it does not only warn of beam shortage in your calculation results. There seems to be a problem with the shear forces. You are in the 1st degree earthquake zone. I suggest you talk to your architect and overhaul the design.
 
Re: CUTTING SECURITY AND MAX. Mr. Nedim, I could not understand the completion of these frames. When we pass beams from the places you have drawn in red, do not beams hang inside the rooms? Or should we go to change the architectural design? So how do we make closed exits without hanging beams inside the rooms? Could solving the hollow block be the solution? Will the floors be flat then? Shear shear forces error does not occur when the concrete is C25. When I make C20, curtain shear force errors appear. What should I do if this problem cannot be solved even though I add curtains? Increasing the thickness of the curtain may cause a decrease in the interior size of the elevator or a decrease in the electrical chimney. Also, thank you very much for your comments...
 
Re: CUTTING SECURITY AND MAX. Now, there is no such thing as a complete completion of the frameworks in the regulation. One of the items in the control sheets of building inspections is "are the frameworks complete?" question.. I even once said that although there is no restriction on this in the regulations, you do not have the right to ask me this. But they exaggerated so much that they would not approve the project if even one column was not connected. But when we look at your project, the outer frame is nowhere complete. This is a pretty troubling situation. So when you look at it, the system is not stable at all. The answer to the question "Will the rooms be flattened" can be "when". Is it the flatness in daily use or the flatness of the building pressed in the earthquake? What should I tell. Now there should be project offices where all disciplines come together. Such projects are born in the works where the architect does not understand the engineer and the engineer cannot convince the architect. Also, I wish you would have used your column right at other points that you made side by side with 60 cm intervals on the balcony. In such systems, at least, there should be sufficient number of curtains in both directions and in design. Good luck with. Good work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top