Advice about the project

[demirmehmetali]

Re: Project Design and Problems Encountered Double stirrups were solved in 30/155 columns, but the special administration requested 3 stirrups, how can I change them to 3 stirrups?

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: Project Design and Problems Encountered

Double stirrups were solved in 30/155 columns, but the special administration wanted 3 stirrups, how can I change them to 3 stirrups

Hello. You have the option of using a single or double stirrup automatically. 3. You do not have the possibility to obtain automatic drawings for the stirrup. According to the TBDY 2018 Regulation conditions, there is a 25Ø distance control between the stirrup and/or cross-ties. Stirrup is not mandatory for the middle region. Tie-crop can be used in the middle of the column. 3 If you want to prepare a drawing with the Stirrup layout. You can use 2D editing tools in the column application plan. Explode the existing column drawing. If the vertical reinforcement distribution is suitable, it can be a method to use the same size stirrup and edit the number of crossties. Or if you want to draw a different size stirrup, the Stirrup command can be used. or the existing stirrup drawing can be exploded and the "Move Node" command can be edited by Stretching the drawing. options and our request notes.

 

[inci]

project control Could you examine my project, please? The staircase has not been processed yet, is there anything else I should do or pay attention to? I'm hesitant because there are too many consoles.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Hello

can you please review my project, the staircase has not been processed yet, is there anything else I need to do or pay attention to? I am hesitant because there are too many consoles.

My suggestions; -- on the 1st floor Create the empty places of the D11-D12 slabs with the slab edge, -- The width of the console should not be more than the column edge where it is inserted, (The reinforcement is wasted at the curtain edge. Like the P02-K11 combination) -- It does not form a frame like the P01-P02 curtains and the front is 2.6 m. It would be better if you do not model with cantilever beams with openings, -- In this version, the program does not perform deflection control when consoles are made from curtains, (it will be active in the next version.) -- In this case, if I had a mold plan as below, my K10 cantilever beam on the 1st floor would be 30/130. floor would also be 30/120. -- Column-beam stiffnesses would be effective, but to stay safe, I would make at least K10-K11 cantilever beams in these dimensions.As I modeled on the left, the right side was the same. You can model e. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[inci]

Hello

can you please review my project, the staircase has not been processed yet, is there anything else I should do or pay attention to? I am hesitant because there are too many consoles.[ /quote] My suggestions; -- Form the vacant places of the D11-D12 slabs on the 1st floor with the slab edge, -- The width of the console should not be more than the column edge where it is inserted, (The reinforcement is wasted on the curtain side. Like the P02-K11 combination) -- The ones that do not form a frame like P01-P02 curtains and It would be better if you don't model with cantilever beams with a front opening of 2.6 m, -- In this version, the program does not control the deflection when consoles are made from the curtains, (it will be active in the next version.) -- In this case, if I had a mold plan like the one below, I had a K10 console on the 1st floor. my beam would be 30/130 on the ground floor and 30/120 on the ground floor. -- Column-beam stiffnesses are effective, but I would make at least K10-K11 cantilever beams in these dimensions to stay safe. You can model the right side the same way I modeled the left side. Ünver ÖZCAN

Thank you very much for your interest, I will do a study again by applying your suggestions

 

[inci]

Hello

can you please review my project, the staircase has not been processed yet, is there anything else I should do or pay attention to? I am hesitant because there are too many consoles.[ /quote] My suggestions; -- Form the vacant places of the D11-D12 slabs on the 1st floor with the slab edge, -- The width of the console should not be more than the column edge where it is inserted, (The reinforcement is wasted on the curtain side. Like the P02-K11 combination) -- The ones that do not form a frame like P01-P02 curtains and It would be better if you don't model with cantilever beams with a front opening of 2.6 m, -- In this version, the program does not control the deflection when consoles are made from the curtains, (it will be active in the next version.) -- In this case, if I had a mold plan like the one below, I had a K10 console on the 1st floor. my beam would be 30/130 on the ground floor and 30/120 on the ground floor. -- Column-beam stiffnesses are effective, but I would make at least K10-K11 cantilever beams in these dimensions to stay safe. You can model the right side the same way I modeled the left side. Ünver ÖZCAN

Instead of P01-P02 curtains, I modeled by making square columns as you said, and even though I made 30/130 beams, I cannot save my deflection.

 

[unver]

Hello

I modeled the beams with a square column as you said instead of the P01-P02 curtains. Even though I made 30/130 beams, I cannot save the deflection. remove the wall loads on the floor, reduce the floor loads, Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[inci]

Hi

I modeled the beams with a square column as you said instead of the P01-P02 curtains, even though I made 30/130, I can't save my deflection.

Cantilever Beam and stuck Think if there are window/door gaps on the beams, remove the wall loads on the upper floor, reduce the floor loads, Ünver ÖZCAN

I would like to ask your forgiveness one last question to clarify the project. What are the conditions for us to always check the deflection condition? When we do not always check the condition, the beam size may be different, and the size may be different when we inspect.

 

[sahinsukru]

Hi

P01-P02 instead of curtains, I modeled the beams by making a square column as you said, and even though I made 30/130, the deflection I can't save it.

If there are window/door gaps on Cantilever Beams and studded beams, think about it, remove the wall loads on the upper floor, reduce the floor loads, Ünver ÖZCAN

I would like to ask you one last question in order to clarify the project. What are the conditions for our time control? In this project, when we do not say always check the deflection condition, the beam size is different, the time size we inspect can be different

ICS 91.080.40 TURKISH STANDARD TS 500/February 2000 page 61, item 13.2

 

[cvlngnr]

hello, I am getting more errors while trying to fix the errors in the project, I am curious about the reasons and solution suggestions. I would appreciate it if you could review and give your valuable opinions.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Hello

I get more errors while trying to fix the errors in the project, I wonder the reasons and solution suggestions. I would appreciate it if you could review and give your valuable feedback.

My suggestions; --Make the elevator curtain a group curtain, BUT: There is not enough floor and beam continuity in connection with the floor around the elevator curtains. TBDY2018 earthquake code also does not want such gaps. Since the displacement of the elevator group curtain, which is more rigid than the building in an earthquake, will be less, the floor connections that are weak will be more or less Damage occurs. Do not make such modeling. If necessary, change the architectural project. Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[fuatmuh]

Good work everyone. I could not fix the errors in the geometry control in the model I created with the cassette tiling system. I have the typical beam identification problem due to slab shapes. In addition, the floor landing floors and the balcony floor, which is supported by the curtain that works as a console, are having extra difficulties, as I cannot understand. I made it so that the error does not appear in the report, but it did not please me. because during the analysis, there are errors in the slabs that are not in my project -for example, I have 10 slabs on the floor, but NETWORK WAS NOT CREATED IN FLOOR 11. The program is doing analysis, but I also see tiles in the report that are not in this model. How can I delete these imaginary tiles? (There are also tiles whose Mdmax value appears to be infinite.)

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Hello My suggestions; --Fix the errors in the geometry control, --Create the stair slab gap with the slab edge,

There are errors in the slabs that are not in my project during the analysis -for example, I have 10 tiles on the floor, but THE NETWORK WAS NOT CREATED IN THE FLOOR NO.

--Check geometry-click on the tile that cannot be meshed-select object in the lower left corner, mark it with exit-press delete, the tile that you marked cannot be meshed will be deleted --In the last calculation, make the width of the finite elements 0.25 m and finish the analysis. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[cvlngnr]

Hi

I am getting more errors while trying to fix the errors in the project, I am curious about the reasons and solution suggestions. --Make the elevator curtain a group curtain, BUT: There is not enough flooring, beam continuity around the elevator curtains, connected with the floor. TBDY2018 earthquake regulation does not want such gaps. Since the displacement of the elevator group curtain, which is more rigid compared to the building, will be less in an earthquake, more or less damage occurs in the weak floor connections. Do not do this type of modeling. If necessary, change the architectural project. Ünver ÖZCAN

thank you, I will contact the architect and suggest changes. I wish you good work.

 

[karabatak]

Hello, I couldn't get over the mistakes in the project I sent the link to, can you give advice on the subject?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Hello

Hello, I couldn't get over the errors in the project I sent the link to, can you give some advice on the subject?

My suggestions; --Remove basement floor stiffness ticks, --Rx=Ry=7 A15, - -Check TS500 and TS498 from Load-Safety, --Make curtains as a group, --Make the calculation according to 4.8.5.1., --You can make curtains from K60 beams, --Correct stair support errors, --Stair slab thickness 0.15 m -Increase the live loads on the floors less than the school, -The live loads are not entered on the attic floor, -Increase the raft thickness for punching or put punching reinforcement, -Complete the calculation by making the finite elements 0.25 m, Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[puncover]

Hello, I will talk to you about something. I have a project with 3 blocks. Their basements will be combined, there will be a parking lot. If I solve all 3 blocks in a single model, will it create a flow in the analysis? Otherwise, I have to solve it with dilatation and it creates trouble for the parking lot as there will be extra columns.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Hi, I have a project with 3 blocks. Their basements will be combined, and there will be a parking lot. If I solve all 3 blocks in one model, will it create a drain in the analysis? Otherwise, I have to solve it with dilatation and the extra column will be Hello, You can solve projects with dilatations in a single project in the program. There will be no problem in terms of the analysis model. During the solution, the program will automatically find the dilations depending on the slab integrity you entered. The status of your building for the decision to enter as a single or separate projects Let's examine the possible assumptions about different geometries with examples: Structures that continue as a single block on the lower floors and as independent towers on the upper floors You do not have the chance to solve such structures as a different project. Therefore, you need to solve the project according to the assumption of more than one rigid diaphragm on the floors (During the solution, the program will automatically finds diaphragms depending on its integrity) Structures with common foundations You can apply two different solutions for structures with common foundations. First alternative, you can enter the structure as a single project and make a solution. The second alternative is to separate and model the building as multiple projects. Structures with dilatations The most appropriate method for solving this type of structures is to model the structure as different projects. -Structural system type selection of buildings, curtain tilting controls, rigid floor definitions, etc. In terms of regulation controls, it would be appropriate to analyze it in separate project files. Good work

 

[semra123]

I cannot analyze the parking project consisting of 2 basement floors because there is no non-rigid floor to solve.

 

[puncover]

You can remove the rigid tick marks as there is no non-rigid upper floor compared to the lower floor.