Advice about the project

Hello. I could not overcome the Perge Group shear force problem. Also, can you give advice about the project, please? Flooring system cassette. There will be a car park in the basement and there is a 40 cm step. I can't add curtains in X direction
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello
"cvlngnr":1jy9mqrn" said:
Hi, I am getting certain errors in my project and I am not sure about the quantity, can you help me
--Ry=7, take A15, model the --3 axis foundations like D axis. Ünver ÖZCAN
 
My asomelene beams do not join the curtains Hello, I have an asomelene flooring that needs to be done very urgently. Since it is my first year in a 2-storey building, I have a few questions for you, my esteemed engineer colleagues; 1. In Asomelen flooring, I made my main beams 50 cm wide and 30 cm high. But when I try to combine it with curtains, unfortunately it does not work. I also took a screenshot and attached it. What is the problem ? 2. Gas concrete will be used as filling material in asomelen flooring, where can I define the load * Thank you in advance.
 
Re: My Asomelen beams do not join the curtains Hello, 1-) ideCAD modeling logic does not allow beams to pass over the curtain. When you connect the beam to the curtain end, the analysis model is formed correctly. The reinforcements of the beam are drawn into the curtain according to the rules in the regulation. However, in reality we continue that beam over the curtain in formwork plans. So you manually extend the beam lines in the formwork plan. K49 and K53 beam reinforcements also need to be drawn continuously. This issue is not a problem in terms of structural analysis, but it creates a deficiency in project production. It's among the notes of the software team, but I don't know when the continuous drawing feature will come. 2-) Calculate the weight of the filling material in the toothed floors manually, and you will write the load per square meter in addition to the coating load section in the flooring settings. In some softwares, the filling type is selected and calculated automatically, I guess your mind went there. You can read the topic in more detail here:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"puncover":3pbvpnou" said:
Hello. I couldn't get over the shear force problem of the Perge Group. Could you also give some advice about the project, please? The flooring system is cassette. There will be a car park in the basement and there is a 40 cm step. I can't add curtains in the X direction
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Any chance you could help?
 
Re: My Asomelen beams do not join with the curtains
"MaFiAMaX":26kp5npr" said:
Hi, 1-) ideCAD modeling logic does not allow beams to pass over the curtain. When you connect the beam to the curtain end, the analysis model is formed correctly. The reinforcement of the beam is also drawn into the wall according to the rules in the regulation. However, in reality we continue that beam over the wall in the formwork plans. So you manually extend the beam lines in the formwork plan. K49 and K53 beam reinforcements also need to be drawn continuously. This is a problem in terms of structural analysis. It is not, but it creates a deficiency in the production of the project. It is among the notes of the software team, but I do not know when the continuous drawing feature will come.
The drawings in the program are in accordance with TBDY page 122, figure 7.7.
 
Re: My Asomelen beams don't join the curtains @sahinsukru, please read my post again carefully. In my article "The reinforcement of the beam is also drawn into the curtain according to the rules in the regulation." I already wrote it.
 
Re: My Asomelen beams don't join the curtains
"MaFiAMaX":wlp17vpb" said:
@sahinsukru, Please read what I wrote carefully again. "[/b]I already wrote.
Everyone may have different preferences, but the program complies with the regulations and does it correctly, I expressed it. It is enough to do it as shown in the figure. In my opinion, there is no benefit to doing it all the time and it is a waste of equipment.
 
hello, is it normal to see such a difference in size between a project that I designed with a continuous basis and a project that I designed with curtains? these days, there are places where I get stuck with the footage and I'm trying to understand exactly why. I would be glad if you help.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"cvlngnr":1prfp3jc" said:
hello, is it normal to have such a difference in size between a project that I designed with a continuous basis and a project that I designed with curtains? =https://we.tl/t-tVl7iEBHJs]https://we.tl/t-tVl7iEBHJs[/url]
Hello, -There are errors in both projects in terms of basic data entry. the foundations should be defined by clicking on the curtain end nodes to form a continuous foundation under the curtain.For all curtains, it would be appropriate to make a definition as you defined under the P1 curtain in the project named 4.ide10. In the project named 4.ide10 with -screen, the basement curtains connected to the floor curtains were defined to overlap the floor curtain For example, the right joint of the P22 curtain is connected to the left joint of the P24 curtain. Arrange the joint points of the curtains to be compatible with the end nodes of the floor curtains. -There are differences between the floor heights and the height of the basement entered with the curtain and the foundation and the entrance in the projects. -When you enter data with the sub-basement curtain, it is expected that the quantity value will be higher due to the increased curtain length. When the foundation is drawn continuously, the sprouts and vertical and horizontal reinforcements of the curtain cause more quantity than the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements in the continuous foundation. Good work.
 
RIBBED FLOOR Hello, dear colleagues, I have a 2-storey construction. And I'm laying asomelen. But the problem is that when I rib my 50 cm protrusions, it gives the error "Possibly incorrect definition of typical tooth continuity". How can I fix this error? 2.) I used some 30/30 beams because the curtains and the wider carrier beams do not join the idecad. Is this a static problem?
 
"Emrah YILDIZ":2elx17yt" said:
"cvlngnr":2elx17yt" said:
hello, is it normal to see such a difference in size between a project I designed with a continuous basis and a project I designed with curtains? these days, there are places where I get stuck with the footage and I'm trying to understand exactly why. I would be glad if you help.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Hello, -Both projects have errors in terms of basic data entry. The foundations connected to the walls in a rigid direction should be defined by clicking on the wall end nodes to form a continuous foundation under the curtain. In all curtains, it would be appropriate to make a definition as you defined under the P1 curtain in the project named 4.ide10. In the project named -curtained 4.ide10, the basement curtains connected to the floor curtains are defined to be above the floor curtain. For example, the right node of the P22 curtain is connected to the left node of the P24 curtain. It is convenient to connect P22 from the left node. Arrange the nodal points of the basement curtains connected to the floor curtains in harmony with the end nodes of the floor curtains. -There are differences between the floor heights and the height of the basement entered with the curtain and the foundation and the entrance in the projects. -When you enter data with the sub-basement curtain, it is expected that the quantity value will be higher due to the increased curtain length. When the foundation is drawn continuously, the sprouts and vertical and horizontal reinforcements of the curtain cause more quantity than the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements in the continuous foundation. Good work.
'-Both projects have errors in terms of basic data entry. The foundations connected to the walls in a rigid direction should be defined by clicking on the wall end nodes to form a continuous foundation under the curtain. In all curtains, it would be appropriate to make a definition as you defined under the P1 curtain in the project named 4.ide10. ' I got a positive result when I arranged the foundation in line with your advice, thank you for your interest and I wish you good work
 
Re: RIBBED FLOOR yes I read that title. But what I'm wondering is, there will be a question as a design, is it actually correct to make a 30/30 beam to that part? What do you think can be done as an alternative to that part? The current project does not hold as an account.
 
Re: RIBBED FLOOR 50/30 It would be more correct to continue the beams straight towards the curtain. It is not a problem that it does not merge with the curtains (it does not affect the analysis). With 2D possibilities, you can continue the beam straight in the formwork plan and edit the reinforcement details. This problem will be eliminated in future updates. It doesn't cause much trouble though.
 
Re: Project Design and Problems Encountered Hello. As can be seen in the appendix, I want to define two floors on top of each other due to the difference in elevation. the tile edge cuts the underlying tile. how can i solve this. thank you.
 
Re: Project Design and Problems Encountered
"tavekkul":2fmyogf5" said:
Hi. I want to define two tiles on top of each other due to the difference in elevation as seen in the attachment. The tile edge cuts the bottom tile. How can I solve this. Thank you Hello.
Hello, -Create a new layer from the layer settings. -Select the D7 tile and tile edges. -Assign it to the new layer you defined with the change layer command. -Close the new layer you defined and define the tile named D86. Then you can open the layers. In the example a similar definition was made by defining the layer named 'Tile 2', you can check it out. Good work.
 
Re: Project Design and Problems Encountered happened when I closed only the tile edge layer and defined the subfloor without making any layer changes. thank you.
 
Back
Top