German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish 1-) THE SPRING LENGTH OF THE COLUMN GIVEN IN THE BASIC APPLICATION PLAN AND THE LENGTH OF THE SPRING DRAWN AT THE VERTICAL EXPANSION OF THE COLUMN ARE GIVEN DIFFERENTLY. (1 cm is not a very big value, but I wrote it for your information) 2-) IF THE ADDITIONAL IRON DIAMETER IS LARGE, ESPECIALLY IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE BEAM REINFORCEMENT, THE MUTUAL ADDITIONS MATCHES THE REINFORCEMENT DUE TO THE LOADING LENGTH, AND IT SHALLS THE REINFORCEMENTS TOO MUCH. IT IS TRANSFERRED TO THE DRAWING IN THE SAME WAY. GOOD WORK.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Two minor fixes...
- Thread starter ryildiz
- Start date
hello... in the projects we have solved according to the new regulation, the column sprout lengths given in the basic details and the sprout lengths given in the column vertical details are given different. The sprout lengths in the basic details are given according to the old regulation...
YasinTezel
Member
"tavekkul":2sunvmhk" said:hello... in the projects we have solved according to the new regulation, the column sprout lengths given in the basic details and the sprout lengths given in the column vertical details are given differently. ] Hi, This issue is in our notes. Thank you for your report.