Reinforced concrete + masonry performance analysis

[freegenc35]

My project, which I have attached, is made of reinforced concrete, but the attic is masonry. 1. Will the program solve the system correctly in my modeling? 2. In the attic floor, the floor is actually sloping, the slope is 40%, but when you make it inclined, some walls are short and some walls are long, I wonder what is the reason for this? The slope will be in the form of an inverted v from the middle, but the slab will be in two parts, but the program does not allow me to draw the edge of the tile in the middle. I am waiting for your help on the subject, thanks in advance....

 

[NYILMAZ]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + MASTING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS You cannot do such a modeling. IdeStatik is a program developed for the solution of reinforced concrete structures. You can't solve a mixed system. It is not possible to define it with the solid panel object that you think of as masonry. If you want to make an admission, however, it may be to effect the loads of the section that you think of as masonry, which is not a correct modeling. It means to subtract one fold. Behavior will be different. If we leave the program aside, there should be no such thing as a mixed structure in practice. Neither reinforced concrete on masonry nor masonry on reinforced concrete can be. Shear forces at floor transitions cannot be met. Moreover, the carrier system design in the existing reinforced concrete floors has never been. Should I say the 10/50 beams you put on the balcony sides, the beams with studs on all sides, or the frames that are not completed in any way... The S4 and S7 columns seem to be connected in two directions. They are also not complete, but connected by three beams. Apart from these, all your other columns have not been precautionary against lateral translation. It is either free in the X direction or free in the Y direction. A carrier system is not designed by placing beams under the walls. You need to name the beams K15, K38, K8 with 2 different names from the cantilever points. Wall loads are taken as 19cm wall thickness everywhere. You made tiny floors 15cm thick. This means an extra load on the building. No semi-rigid diaphragm, no ladder load etc. I don't get into the issues.

 

[freegenc35]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Thanks for your attention, but this is not a structure I designed, I just modeled the existing structure. I have seen many shortcomings that you have mentioned. But this is a structure to be analyzed for performance. The existing structure is the one I described and modeled in my previous message.

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + MASTERY PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Thanks for your attention, but this is not a structure I designed, I just modeled the existing structure. this is a building to be analyzed for performance...existing building, as I explained and modeled in my previous message, I would be happy if you could help with a building performance point or model the building behavior...

Hello, the model program data entry you created as Mr. Nedim said It is not suitable in terms of masonry construction. A modeling can be done by adding the loads from the masonry part of the building to the system. Performance analysis of masonry structures is also not performed in the program. Good work

 

[NYILMAZ]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Thanks for your attention, but this is not a structure I designed, I just modeled the existing structure. this is a building to be analyzed for performance... the existing structure is as I explained and modeled in my previous message. I skipped it. When I didn't see anything to emphasize this in the subject content, I perceived it as a structure for some reason. I wrote an answer accordingly. If I made you the one who made those mistakes, I apologize for the sentences I wrote extra in this sense.

 

[freegenc35]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + MASTERY PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Thanks for your attention, but this is not a structure I designed, I just modeled the existing structure. I have seen many shortcomings that you have mentioned. But this is a structure to be analyzed for performance... the existing structure, as I explained and modeled in my previous message, would be happy if you could help with a building performance point or model the building behavior... The word performance analysis is only mentioned in the title. That's why I skipped. When I didn't see anything to emphasize this in the content of the subject, I perceived it as a structure for some reason. I wrote an answer accordingly. If I have made you a person who makes those mistakes, I apologize for the extra sentences I wrote in this sense. Of course, when we make a mistake, we will be criticized positively so that we can find the truth... I would also like to thank you for your interest in the subject... I just have a question, does the program automatically take the load of the heaped part in the current modeling system? Do you think it is right to give it as a load or to let the program take it as I modeled it? ( The purpose here is the performance of the reinforced concrete part )

 

[freegenc35]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + MASTERY PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Thanks for your attention, but this is not a structure I designed, I just modeled the existing structure . I have seen many faults that you have mentioned. But this is a structure to be analyzed for performance. The existing structure is as I explained and modeled in my previous message. As Mr. said, the model you created is not suitable for program data entry. A modeling can be done by adding the loads from the masonry part of the building to the system. Performance analysis of masonry structures is not performed in the program. Good work

Mr. Levent, performance analysis will not be about the masonry part, but rather the reinforced concrete part. The masonry part is demolished if necessary. Do you think that when the model stays in the form of Reinforced Concrete + Masonry, it automatically takes the loads and effects on its own? Or is it better if I add these effects as a load to the system?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Re: REINFORCED CONCRETE + BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Thanks for your attention, but this It's not a building I designed, I just modeled the existing structure. I saw many shortcomings that you mentioned, but this is a structure to be analyzed for performance... the existing structure is a structure that I have described and modeled in my previous message, if you help with a building performance point or at the point of modeling building behavior I would be glad...

Hello, as Mr. Nedim said, the model you created is not suitable for program data entry. A modeling can be made by adding the loads from the masonry part of the building to the system. Performance analysis of masonry structures is also not done in the program. Good work[/quote ] Mr. Levent, the performance analysis will not be about the masonry part, but rather the reinforced concrete part. The masonry part will be demolished if necessary. Do you think, as I created the model, Reinforced Concrete + Masonry Scheme Does it automatically take the loads and effects when it stays in the clinic? Or would it be better if I put these effects on the system as a load?

As I mentioned in my previous message, the model you created is wrong in terms of data entry. Panel objects, beams and slabs defined for the masonry part do not transfer loads. A modeling can be done by adding the loads from the masonry part of the building to the system. Good work

 

[freegenc35]

Thank you Mr. Levent, good work...