Column reinforcement error

S

semih5252

New Member
IN MY PROJECT, THE REINFORCEMENTS OF THE S1 AND S10 SIDES ARE TOO LOADED ON THE 3rd FLOOR. HOW CAN I SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. ANOTHER TOPIC IS MY FRINGES WIDTH 50 CM ON 3 FLOORS BUT THERE IS CONTINUOUS FAULTS IN THE REPORT. MY FLOOR EDGES CANNOT BE FINISHED.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Re: COLUMN REINFORCEMENT ERROR Hello --Make D11-D13 slab as a single slab as above. THE ACCOUNT IS SAVING BUT: --S01-S10 columns have no connection on the floors, (the band does not connect with the beam, it is not taken into account anyway) .) --Connect A, 1, 8 axis with beam, --Take the live loads of the balconies 350, --Let the short side of the column be at least 30 cm, --Remove the attic wall loads, --Reduce the live loads of the attic, - -Take the ladder loads, take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Thank you very much for your reply, Unver. When you examine the architecture of the project, you will see that when we design beams in this way, the beams pass through the middle of the rooms on the upper floors, so our architect does not approach the solution in this way due to commercial and design concerns. Can you help me to solve it in another way?
 
When the columns are 30*60 in size and the last floor beam and slab loads are adjusted, my problem is solved. But as you said, the lack of connection of S01 and S10 columns is annoying, although the calculation saves..
 
"semih5252":2c0jnz8q" said:
http://s2.dosya.tc/server3/8womlp/ERDAL_SAHIN_MIMARI.rar.html Thank you very much for your answer, Mr. Unver. When you examine the architecture of the project, you will see that when we design beams in this way, beams on the upper floors As it passes through the middle of it, our architect does not approach the solution in this way due to commercial and design concerns. How can I solve it in another way, can you help me about this. 7 columns (the number of columns in the building are already known) are not connected to the other direction. Moreover, two of them are completely double-sided columns cantilever (corner columns). What kind of commercial concern can we talk about in this case? If not (it's better than this, although I don't approve) suggest a gear floor system (hollow hole).
Click to expand...
 
Yes, I think too, and even certainly the columns should be connected from the other direction with at least 50/36 horizontal beams. In my opinion, it is the biggest mistake that is almost always made in housing etc projects made in almost all regions of our country and for some reason accepted and approved by the municipalities. Definitely, this type of carrier system projects without a framework should be returned to the designer, saying that it did not happen, go and review it. All other facts and errors in the design of steel and reinforced concrete structures, including manufacturing errors, cannot be dangerous from such situations. "Our architect does not approach the solution in this way due to commercial and design concerns." I wish you hadn't finished this sentence. This sentence is the answer to why civil engineering does not get the respect it deserves today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top