muhendis35
New Member
Everything is normal in the attached project, but the S29 column does not provide the column beam shear safety. What is the reason?..I will be glad if you help me....thanks in advance everyone...
If the architectural project allows, providing 5 cm offset to S40 and S42 column with respect to their axes solves the joint safety problem. You can define the X-lengths of the relevant columns with a smaller size of the Joint. In addition, the longitudinal reinforcement less than 14 mm in the Columns. Do not use diameter."muhendis35":1c43179k" said:system looks very neat but somehow S40 il S42 column does not provide shear safety...I also increased the concrete class..I can't put it there in a polygon column due to architectural reasons..how will it be, I would appreciate if you help ((...project annexes...
Dear Bolvadinim This is an existing situation in our determinations... Thank you for your interest.I downloaded the project named Kaymakam Evi (with default settings) and analyzed it. The file is attached. Although there are 6 pieces of 14-gauge reinforcement on round (r:15) columns in the column ablation plan, it is not shown in the drawing. I saw 8 pieces of 14' reinforcements...
"muhendis35":2bhjhrqh" said:ewtt why is there a dividing result dilemma in circular columns... should I put too much iron on these columns so...what will happen?[/ quote] 6 reinforcements are sufficient for the relevant columns. After you get the column application plan, you can intervene in the drawings. If you do not want to interfere with the drawings, you can increase the number of column reinforcements in the Reinforced Concrete dialog.
Hello, In the project, there is a slip problem on some curtains besides columns and beams. Also I would like to point out some points that caught my attention: -Effective ground acceleration coefficient (A0)= 0.51 is entered. When earthquake zone 1 is selected, A0=0.4 is selected as per the regulation (entering the effective ground acceleration coefficient 0.51 means 27.5% more earthquake force on the structure than 0.4) -1. Basement floor, I think, does not have the rigidity to accept the perimeter curtains as solid rigid. Therefore, it would be appropriate to enter the Basement Rigid floor number -2 in the Analysis settings. I am attaching a sample project to the forum where the cross-sectional insufficiency problems are solved for you to review. changes made; -one. -model as shell- and -basement/panel that does not continue upstairs- lines from the properties of P1-P2-P3-P4-P5 panels located on the basement floor and do not continue to the upper floor marked. -Upper rigid basement floor number -2 is entered. -R coefficient 7 was entered. Column sizes of -40/80 were made 50/85. -Beam dimensions have been adjusted. - Curtain widths were made 30 cm. - Larger size reinforcements were selected in curtain reinforcement selection. The cassettes D14-19-21 on the -1st basement floor were constantly identified. -Rat floor reinforcement axles and valid distances have been defined appropriately. Note: More economical solutions can be obtained if more detailed work is done on the project."tasarim":3suvyx3u" said:Greetings ... I couldn't fix the B error of 3 columns in the project you did. Also, I couldn't get a solution no matter what I did on beams 29 - 30 - 31 . I wonder if I did wrong. I am attaching the file. I have 4 blocks of a building with a basement floor, I made 4 m due to the slope of the land. Thanks in advance....
My suggestions; Create the building entrance parameters using the TBDY2018 Analysis Settings Wizard. Check the coordinates of the building's location. The project is attached. Ünver Özcan"im furkan":21m84xw1" said:by im furkan » 30 Nov 2020, 14:42 I am a new graduate, I am trying to learn by drawing old projects. I have a project in my hand and I could not fix the error saying s02 that the column beam shear safety is not provided, I wonder if I throw the project. Can you please and tell me if I have any mistakes?
Hi K21 / K22 beams are not on the same axis due to their offset and should not be designed as a continuous beam in the reinforcement design. Disable "Continuously accept beam at right end". Analyze again. Check reinforcement design. Corrected project is attached."cvlngnr":1a75we3l" said:hello, I can't get past the column beam connection shear safety error in a column in my project. When I increase the column dimensions, it gives the same error on other columns. I would appreciate if you could help.You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.