Urgent help please. Floor deflection limit exceeded problem

[prol0gic]

friends I need urgent help. When I accept semi-rigid diaphragm and analyze the system, I get the error that the floor deflection limit has been exceeded in the ground floor d11-12-13-14 console plates. Interestingly, when I go to the analysis with full rigid diaphragm acceptance, my kz11 and kz12 beams are deflection limit has been hung, while d11- 12-13-14 slabs get rid of the S warning. How do I fix this and kz11 and kz12 tampered analyze it gives an S warning, I check the reinforcements and when I press the reinforced concrete tab, the warning goes away, but there is no change in the reinforcements, so the pressure does not increase the reinforcement, everything is the same as it is, but it removes the warning. I don't understand, (I don't think it's normal for the cantilever floor deflection of 50cm x 218cm) and I want to do a semi-rigid analysis, thinking that my system cannot show full rigid diaphragm feature, is my project consisting of very large sections for the ground+1 floor building (columns are placed in a way that does not completely disrupt the architecture, the villa project is in the hall. Absolutely no drooping beams or columns are desired. r (come to order)), my mistakes that caught your eye, what I need to fix, I am really open to all the ideas of my friends who are experts in this business and I ask my authorized friends AND After the last update of the 7version, the program has become very annoying to me and the comments of other users around me show different behaviors in this direction, which I cannot understand If I'm going to be an example (in the boxes where we enter the length unit, phrases such as 0.00000000000 appear, etc. It does not improve without opening and closing the project), my project is attached please, I am waiting for your help, good work.

 

[Levent Özpak]

friends I need urgent help. When I accept semi-rigid diaphragm and analyze the system, I get the error that the floor deflection limit has been exceeded in the cantilever slabs on the ground floor d11-12-13-14. Interestingly, when I go to the analysis with full rigid diaphragm acceptance, kz11 and my kz12 beams warn that the deflection limit has been hung, while the d11-12-13-14 slabs get rid of the S warning. (I don't think it's normal for 50cm x 218cm cantilever floor deflection) and I want to do a semi-rigid analysis, thinking that my system cannot show full rigid diaphragm feature

] When the analysis is made according to the full and semi-rigid diaphragm option, the change in the analysis results is a situation that can be encountered because the analysis models change. The deflection values in the floors that give a deflection warning in the analysis according to the semi-rigid diaphragm option are not very large values (3.5-4.5 mm) It gives a deflection warning. curve is marked. When this line is unchecked, the "Height/Span ratios that do not require deflection calculation" given in TS 500 Table 13.1 will be provided, so deflection control will not be performed and no warning will be given.

kz11 and kz12 are doing full rigid analysis, it gives an S warning, I check the reinforcements and when I press the reinforced concrete tab, the warning goes away, but there is no change in the reinforcements, so the pressure does not increase the reinforcement, everything is the same as it is, but I don't understand why[/ quote] Although the warning appears to be cleared when you click on the Reinforced Concrete line in the Beam reinforced concrete dialog, it can be seen in the Beam deflection report that the problem persists in the relevant beams.After pressing the reinforced concrete button in the program's reinforced concrete dialogs, it is appropriate to perform a final analysis

. After the last update of the ..7 version, the program has become very annoying to me and the comments of other users around me are exhibiting different behaviors in this direction, which I cannot understand, for example (inscriptions such as 0.00000000000 appear in the boxes where we enter the length unit, etc. It does not improve without opening and closing the project

) The situation is related to the Windows region and language settings. city may be. Editing the Decimal symbol .(period), Digit grouping symbol (,) to comma in Control Panel/Region and Language/Format/Additional Settings dialog may fix the problem. If the problem is not resolved, call us. Let's examine the problem in more detail by accessing your computer remotely. Tel:0-224-220 67 17 Good work

 

[prol0gic]

Thank you, Mr. Levent.