Risky structure analysis

"Zumre":3v8ukr4c" said:
I thank Mr. Ismail for your interest. Since the file size is large, I sent the file to [email protected] RISKY BUILDING NEW REGULATION REPORT( MUHSİN SANCAKTAROĞLU) with this title. Good work
Hello, Columns are sheathed in the project you sent for the risky building report. "Risk Structural Analysis" has not been added yet. The jacketed columns will be added with the performance analysis in the next version.
 
Hello. Would it be wrong if we define the sheathed columns with their sheathed dimensions as if they have never been sheathed, and with the sheathing concrete and reinforcement?
 
"lozhan":2bngj7qf" said:
Hello Would it be wrong if we define the sheathed columns with their sheathed dimensions as if they have never been jacketed, and with the sheathing concrete and reinforcement? It only takes into account the reinforcements in the mantle section, so the calculation seems reasonable at first glance.
 
I had an accumulated file for performance analysis, this was bad, I waited for the update to be made within this month. We will send the customers to someone else now. There seems to be nothing to do.
 
"Ismail Hakki Besler":1cfawn5b" said:
The risky structure analysis intervened. Performance update can be made in the first half of May.
Hello Mr. Ismail, Is the performance analysis meant to evaluate the existing buildings in section 15 with linear calculation methods or Is it the ability to evaluate and design for strain (SHBT) as defined in chapter 5. When we talk to our colleagues, that's why I often call the SHDT approach performance analysis, that's why I asked.Also, in your previous explanation (see
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
) In the analysis of high-rise buildings with BYS=1, the analysis under the DD-1 earthquake You explained that it will be done with an ideCAD version that is different from the standard version. The GGDT analysis for the controlled damage performance level found here is also an analysis that should be done in buildings with BYS=2 or 3 and DTS=1a, 2a. Since BYS=1 is not available, this moment is Is it possible to sell? I wish you good work.
 
"lozhan":w6eswn8a" said:
hello Is item 4.1.7 checking automatically in risky structure analysis?
Actually, this is not a check, but an assumption made for beam reinforcement.
 
"lozhan":1es5ntvw" said:
hello Is item 4.1.7 checking automatically in risky structure analysis?
"MaFiAMaX":1es5ntvw" said:
Actually, this is not a check, but an assumption made for beam reinforcement. If ideCAD doesn't do it automatically, reinforcement will be entered for all beams manually.
Instead of the lower support reinforcement being 33% of the upper support, you can have the program automatically select the reinforcement with 30%. 1. Remove the beam reinforcement fixtures. 2. Select TBDY 2007 and set A0 as small as 0.0001 to reduce earthquake loads. With this process, 1.4G+1.6Q will naturally be active on beams after analysis. 3. In order to activate the condition that the lower support will be 30% of the upper support according to the regulation (the program does this automatically), select the earthquake zone 4. (If you don't, 50% will remain active.) 4. Analyze and then fix the beam reinforcements. 5. Then you can select TBDY 2018 and proceed to risky building analysis.
 
Hello, I have attached a file with risk analysis. A project with sheathed columns. Considering that the risk analysis of the already sheathed columns was not performed in ide ver 10.06, I would like to get the opinions of the friends who follow this form.
 
Back
Top