eissenhover
New Member
Hello everyone, I would like to ask for your information on a subject, there are two images below, Image 1: The beam end freedoms were opened and adjusted to not transfer moment, naturally no moment was transferred to the columns after the analysis, max moment occurred in the middle of the beam, and the beam did not recover (pmm insufficient 2nd Visual: the same beam was adjusted to transmit moment and the amount of moment in the middle of the beam decreased, the moment was transmitted to the columns and the beam was saved (pmm was sufficient) So in the non-moment transfer system, all the moment was accumulated in the beam and the system (beam) did not save, but the truss-lattice etc. truss elements in systems are always hinged, I don't understand the contrast? In other words, according to the pictures I added, beams were saved in the moment-transmitting joint, that is, there was no need to enlarge the section. aren't articulated joints in the system more economical? This contradiction really confused me.