Hello, Our general recommendations for data entry are as follows: -The elevations of the columns S03 and S04 on the 4th floor are not compatible with the columns on the 3rd floor. -The elevation of the 3rd floor S021 slab is not compatible with the inclined beams. To prevent the floor from connecting to the beams slab edge may be scratched. The elevation of the slab S020 at +135 level on the -3rd floor is not compatible with P01 and P02. The upper level of P01 and P02 should be arranged as +135 cm on the 3rd floor and +135 cm on the 4th floor.(S20 slab is rigid It may not be operated as a diaphragm.) -3. The slope of the k03 beam of the 3rd floor should be arranged so that the elevation is compatible with the floor. analysis is appropriate. -It would be appropriate to model the curtains as shells. - If the column header defined for the S10 column in the basement floor is to be applied in architectural plan mode and on site, it must be defined according to the conditions specified in TS 500. You can download the sample data from the link."geylanikiymet":1bcvx3f0" said:Good day, I created a system taking into account your suggestions, but I could not make the sloping roof on the roof, it constantly gives errors, incorrect beam intersection, vertical discontinuities, etc. Could you please review the project in general and help about the roof? thanks
Thank you very much, Mr. Levent, I applied it but I couldn't solve a problem. When I apply the same elevations of the columns on the 3rd and 4th floors, I still get a vertical continuity error edit: fixed it thanks again"Levent Özpak":35k3hfbt" said:Hello, Our general recommendations and suggestions for data entry are as follows; -4. The elevations of the columns S03 and S04 on the 3rd floor are not compatible with the columns on the 3rd floor. The elevation of the 3rd floor S021 flooring is not compatible with the curved beams. The slab edge may be scratched so that the slab is not attached to the joists. The elevation of the slab S020 at +135 level on the -3rd floor is not compatible with P01 and P02. The upper elevation of P01 and P02 on the 3rd floor is +135 cm, and the elevation on the 4th floor is +135 cm. (S20 slab may not be operated as a rigid diaphragm.) -3. The slope of the k03 beam of the 3rd floor should be arranged so that the elevation is compatible with the slab. - It is appropriate to analyze with semi-rigid diaphragm method for connecting sloping floors to columns and each other. -It would be appropriate to model the curtains as shells. - If the column header defined for the S10 column in the basement floor is to be applied in architectural plan mode and on site, it must be defined according to the conditions specified in TS 500. You can download the sample data from the link."geylanikiymet":35k3hfbt" said:Good day, I created a system taking into account your suggestions, but I could not make the sloping roof on the roof, it constantly gives errors, incorrect beam intersection, vertical discontinuities, etc. Can you review and help about the roof as of now? Many thanks in advanceYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.Good work
Edited. beam intersection, vertical discontinuities, etc. Could you please review the project in general and help about the roof? Many thanks in advance[/quote][/quote] Hello, Our general recommendations for data entry are as follows: -4th floor S03 and S04 The elevations of the columns of the 3rd floor are not compatible with the columns of the 3rd floor S021 floor level of the 3rd floor is not compatible with the inclined beams Flooring to prevent the floor from connecting to the beams edge can be drawn. The elevation of the slab S020 at +135 level on the -3rd floor is not compatible with P01 and P02. The upper elevation of P01 and P02 on the 3rd floor is +135 cm, and the elevation on the 4th floor is +135 cm. (S20 slab may not be operated as a rigid diaphragm.) -3. The slope of the k03 beam of the 3rd floor should be arranged so that the elevation is compatible with the slab. - It is appropriate to analyze with semi-rigid diaphragm method for connecting sloping floors to columns and each other. -It would be appropriate to model the curtains as shells. - If the column header defined for the S10 column in the basement floor is to be applied in architectural plan mode and on site, it must be defined according to the conditions specified in TS 500. You can download the sample data from the link."geylanikiymet":1dvgv2r1" said:Thank you very much, Mr. Levent, I applied it but I couldn't solve a problem. When I apply the same elevations of the columns on the 3rd and 4th floors, I still get a vertical continuity error
"geylanikiymet":eysjeny3" said:good day in the project I finished, architecturally, the p3 curtain goes up to the elevator tower, because it would not look good aesthetically, I was asked to change it. When I apply 30/70 columns to the top of the curtain, I do not see an error in the reinforced concrete part, but what is the solution? Can I apply it?
Thanks, I didn't quite understand when I said column-sized curtain object, leventbey, should I remove the curtains from the very beginning?"Levent Özpak":zws7ufqa" said:Hello, Defining a column on the curtain causes vertical continuity problem. At this stage, you can define a column size curtain object. Good work"geylanikiymet":zws7ufqa" said:good day, in the project I finished, architecturally, the p3 curtain goes up to the elevator tower. an error does not appear, but I get an irregularity error, what solution can I apply? Thanks in advance
You will define the curtain P03 on the 4th floor with the 30/70 size and "Curtain" command."geylanikiymet":gfoc3u0o" said:Thanks, I didn't quite understand when you said curtain object in column size, leventbey, should I remove the curtains from the very beginning?
Thank you levent pit There was a problem with it, so I wanted to try it. Thanks again. n"Levent Özpak":3p69mbjj" said:Additional information; In the project, you entered the stiffness reduction factors of the elevator perimeter walls under earthquake and vertical loads close to zero. -The regulation does not allow stiffness reduction on the curtains. Remove the marks on the lines and analyze again. -Also the elevator shaft should not be defined in the static analysis model. The raft slab can be analyzed without the pit, and then the elevator pit detail can be given separately in the foundation drawings. The following links can be examined.You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.Good work
German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish