Is it okay if the joint is not made on the foundations in dilatation buildings?

I

insaatcı

New Member
Hello again. Normally, in dilatation buildings, the joint is made throughout the entire structure. But lately I have seen that it cannot be done in Basics. Since we are traditionalists, I did not prefer it in my statics and continued to make jointed foundations. However, in the type project I have at the moment, there is a single-base structure consisting of 3 blocks. this static has been drawn and applied by others. Now which way would be better to do it?
 
Re: In dilatation buildings, the joint should not be done on the foundations. m Different blocks can be grouped under a single foundation and solved and made. This is up to the engineer. There are two main points to consider here. One of these is the homogeneity of the ground under the common foundation (if it is homogeneous, a single foundation can be made.) The second is that the loads brought by the superstructure are approximately equal to each other. In other words, maybe the number of floors is the same or close. If you combine a 3-storey block with a common foundation next to a 10-storey block, of course, different effects and settlements will occur. Therefore, it may not be economical.
 
Re: In dilatation buildings, it would be better if the joint was not made on the foundations. However, there is a situation. In the project that I have been dealing with for days, when I make the only foundation, high internal forces occur in some carriers and the reinforcement is exceeded. especially the beams. However, when I analyze with a separate basis, lower prices are found. Its basic cross section is already growing. We will now have to accept it. Now this is what I'm wondering. Does the dilatation to the foundation have any effect on the beams and curtains in the superstructure? Or is this difference due to the program? Friends in IDE. Have you received this type of information before? ???
 
Re: In dilatation buildings, it would be better if the joint was not made on the foundations. (This is the correct solution method. The superstructure is to solve interactively.) This is an issue independent of the dilatation I mentioned. But the fact that the foundation is whole is the reason why the influences on the superstructure are also different. Therefore, if you are making a superstructure interactive solution, it makes a difference for the superstructure whether it is dilated or not.
 
Re: It would be okay if the joints were not made on the foundations in dilatation buildings Speaking of dilatation, is it a problem to solve a b+z+1 storey 60-meter building without dilatation, or in other words, at a distance of this or that distance in the earthquake regulation. Is there an issue that will be dilated, respects. .. Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 
Re: In dilatation buildings, it is okay if the joint is not done on the foundations
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
The article in the link is about dilatations. And you can also review the resources at the end of the article.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top