Re: !!! HELP !!! FLOOR SECURITY IS INSUFFICIENT !!! * Your choice of upper basement floor number is not correct. * You should use the semi-rigid diaphragm solution method. * Your ground safety stress is very low. If there is no error in the ground report, you should not build on such a ground. In this case, I suggest you go for ground improvement. If the floor is like this, then it is group D floor and you cannot use the 50% increase option. * You should name the beam KZ191 (also on other floors) with three different names. * There are rafter raft and continuous foundation beams in the system. The superstructure is not an interactive solution. * It would be more correct to make the k216-217 beam on the basement floor as a single beam. * You used 15 cm thickness in all of the tiles. There are many small tiles. The more thickness, the more weight and load, which will contribute to the increase of earthquake effects. Thinning the unnecessary floors will both provide economy and contribute to the solution. * The same applies to beam loads. Even the inner beams have a 19 cm wall load. Is this really so? * If all your beams have a 19 cm wall, how is the live load (0.20) formed at the same time? * Design the ladder, place it in place and solve it together with the structure. * I recommend that you also review the attic floor and beam loads * Now you have frames that are not connected to each other. * There is one 25/32 beam as well as a console? (k218) * R=7 is entered, there are curtains, but the curtains do not contribute to the system. (especially p1, p2)