Increase system rigidity with high relative floor drift

[unver]

Re: Increase system rigidity with high relative storey drift

Do you mean connect from column to girth here?

Yes

so In one case, because beams pass through the hall due to architecture, a connection was made from the outside, not from the column to the column.

Also ((You should choose the carrier system coefficients with frame in X direction and frame in Y direction, )) where do we choose this place exactly?

Choose A31 and A33 from the wizard. Ünver ÖZCAN

 

[batuhann28522]

Do you mean connect from column to girth here?

Yes

in such a case, beam in the hall due to architecture

No frame is formed as you have done.

And ((( You should choose the carrier system coefficients with framed X-direction framed, Y-direction framed curtain, from where)) we choose this place exactly ?

Select A31 to A33 from the wizard. Ünver ÖZCAN

Thank you very much for your answers. I can't solve the 2nd floor increase rigidity error. Can't it be solved without increasing the column dimensions?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Also (((You should choose the carrier system coefficients with X-direction framed Y-direction framed curtains, )) where exactly do we choose this?

From the wizard, with A31 Select A33. Ünver ÖZCAN

Hello Mr. Ünver, TotalMdev<0.75Mo in the project, BYS=7 and DTS=3. In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 4.3.4.6 referred to in TBDY 2018 article 4.3.4.7, it would be appropriate to choose the carrier system type A31 in both directions. Good work

 

[Levent Özpak]

Thank you very much for your answers. I can't solve the "Increase the 2nd floor stiffness" error. Can't it be solved without increasing the column dimensions?

Did you fix the error I mentioned in my message above and analyze it?

Hi, the values entered in DD-3 in the TBDY Wizard/Design Spectrum tab are incorrect. The coefficients given for the DD-3 earthquake ground motion level must be entered from the Earthquake Map. If the latitude and longitude coordinates are correct, you can also use the values calculated by the program when you click the "Offline" line. (Since the algorithms are different, there may be slight differences between the values taken from the map.) Good work

 

[batuhann28522]

Did you correct the error I mentioned in my message above and analyze it?

Hello, the values entered in DD-3 in the TBDY Wizard/Design Spectrum tab are incorrect. The coefficients given for the DD-3 earthquake ground motion level must be entered from the Earthquake Map. If the latitude and longitude coordinates are correct, you can also use the values calculated by the program when you click the "Offline" line. (Since the algorithms are different, there may be slight differences between them and the values taken from the map.) Good work

Yes, I fixed it, now I'm getting a stapling error in the L column on the left, even though I made the base 80cm, what is your suggestion?

 

[Levent Özpak]

Yes, I fixed it, now I get a stapling error. Even though I made the foundation 80cm on the left L column, it did not improve. What is your suggestion?

Stapling warning is given due to the D25 slab defined at the end of the column in the basement ceiling. you can edit.

 

[G Köse]

Re: Increase system rigidity with high relative floor displacement Congratulations to the architect of the project, he added a lot of aesthetics, the indentations are protruding, it is also nice to think of birds, after all, we are the descendants of the Ottoman Empire, they made it and we build a bird's nest with a special aesthetic balcony for them !! For God's sake, what is it, what is its purpose, what is its benefit, let's architect, why does the civil engineer motamot try to integrate this freak into his model, if it is very necessary, add it on the drawing sheet at the end of the analysis. Hey civil engineers, you don't have to be so dependent on the architect.

 

[civilas01]

Relative story displacement and stiffness problem I cannot solve the ground+2 storey building in the draft project due to the relative storey drift problem, I cannot increase the dimensions of the 3 columns on the F axis because there is a workplace entrance, I cannot add a curtain, how can I solve it

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[unver]

Re: Relative story displacement and stiffness problem Hello. My Suggestions: --Your structure is seen in the place given as a template in the program, enter the data of its location, --Place a curtain in the Y direction for the hollow block structure to be mixed and curtained, -- Article 4.3.4.6. (0.75) does not provide rollover control, --Don't make console bounce off beam, --Fix errors in geometry control, --2. you can reduce the floor loads on the floor, -- Brace the ladder and solve it together, Last word: Since our new earthquake regulation penalizes the structures with hollow blocks, it is difficult to control 0.75, return to the column-beam-curtain system. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[[email protected]]

Relative floor offset error Hello. I can't solve the relative floor offset, can you help me? (S11, S16, S20, S23 COLUMNS ARE ARCHITECTURE SUITABLE FOR MAKING SCREEN)

 

[unver]

Re: Relative floor drift error Hello. My suggestions: -- If there is an elevator tower floor, enter it, otherwise delete this floor, --2. You can remove the wall loads on the floor ceiling and reduce the floor live loads, -- If you create a frame outside the building, your problem will most likely be solved. (In some cities, the building inspections and the municipality have taken a decision of principle and do not accept the project without a frame on the outer columns. It is a correct decision.) --Since the frame connection is not formed, the S23 column gives a relative floor drift error in both directions. First, make a group by putting curtains around the elevator. --If it doesn't, turn the columns you suggested into curtains one by one, paying attention to the symmetry, until they are saved. Unver ÖZCAN

 

[sscchheenn]

I couldn't solve the relative floor offset problem I couldn't solve the relative floor offset problem..can you help me if I send the project?

 

[volvoxx]

Re: idecad static 10 relative floor drift issue

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Concrete quality c30, Sz 02 and S02 Error.

 

[sscchheenn]

Re: idecad static 10 relative floor drift issue

https://www.idecadsupport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7394 S02 Error .

Relative floor hoteling error does not go away even if I fix s2

 

[sscchheenn]

Re: idecad static 10 relative story drift problem

https://www.idecadsupport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7394 Concrete quality c30 , Sz 02 and S02 It gives an error.

no matter what I tried... my space is limited in the project... I tried everything that could come to mind but it didn't work..

 

[HakanŞahin]

Re: ideCAD static v10 could not solve the relative story drift problem Earthquake acceleration is too high in your building ZE soil group. You have no choice but to increase the column dimensions in terms of the structure location. If you select a more solid soil group and enter the acceleration values, you can observe how much the relative floor drift values differ (decrease). Since your structure is short in the x direction, more rigidity is needed in that direction. By changing the direction of the column dimensions in the 1 and 7 side axes at the top and bottom of the structure, I increased the dimensions sufficiently to provide the relative floor offset as in the attached project. It can give you an idea about the subject. Ground floor plan view of your project: Ground floor plan view with relative floor offset: Relative floor displacement report: You can also consider applying TBDY Article 4.9.1.3b, provided that it is built on-site. There is an option in the analysis settings.

 

[sscchheenn]

Re: I couldn't solve the problem of relative floor drift I can't change the direction of the columns on the 1 axis because there is a closed overhang and I have a balcony.. that's the problem... I don't have a chance to play with those columns

 

[ErayOZ]

Relative floor drift problem Good day, No matter what I do in the project I have, I could not get rid of the relative displacement problem, the ground is incredibly bad. In addition, we cannot apply the article 4.9.1.3.b in the earthquake code. I can't think of how to fix this anymore. I will be grateful if you could help me.

 

[G Köse]

Re: relative floor drift problem Actually, the answer is in your question, why are you trying to build a building on an unbelievably bad ground?? your floor; Believable, acceptable building should be improved until it is suitable for construction, the building cannot stand firmly on the ground so that it can remain static, ( remove the banana peel from under the feet of the building)

 

[sahinsukru]

Re: relative floor drift problem

Good afternoon, I couldn't get rid of the relative displacement problem no matter what I did in the project I have, the ground is unbelievable. We can't implement it. I can't think of how to fix this anymore. I would appreciate it if you could help me.