emergency aid

Hello, In the first project, the columns S09-S10 on the basement floor could not be lowered under the elevator pit. Define -150 cm elevation value for the relevant columns. Draw a panel object by arranging the top and elevation values between the columns. It is recommended that you review the document with the link below for the controls to be made after data entry.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
In some of your beams, the deflection value and the limit value seem to be very close to each other. (Deflection values can be examined in the Reinforced Concrete/Beam/Deflection-Crack tab.) The problem can be solved if the compression reinforcement is increased in the relevant beams and the analysis is performed again. (After the analysis, it should be checked whether there is a B problem in the columns.)
 
Mr. ertub_23 Upper rigid floor must be given -2, not -1. When it is given -2 and analyzed, the number of errors comes out from 15 to 85. I think rebuild your static system. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
 
What is the reason why I changed the rigid basement floor number to -2, is it because the basement floor height is too high?
 
picture 1 to 3 = earthquake management 2.7.2.4 picture 1= if you see the upper rigid basement number, you will doubt the number of rigid basement floors, enter the report section and you can review it by clicking the summary there...
 
In addition, from the report section, you can examine which floor you consider as rigid and the number of rigid basement floors, because with amplitude (in floors with the same pattern), the earthquake force value increases as one goes out of the floor, whereas the seismic force of the rigid basement first reaches a high value as the picture below shows. The owner later sees it increase, which means that if we didn't accept the basement floor as a rigid basement floor, the earthquake force would increase from the basement floor upwards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top