Amenities Not Added to New Version 6.0051.

Bolvadinim

New Member
Hello, I would like to bring up the features that have not been added to the users in the new version of ideCAD Static, whose development process continues with 3 years of intensive work. oblique detail drawings (beam details and vertical openings) 4-One-piece or multi-part circular, curvilinear, arc and serpentine curtain definition 5-The use of mesh reinforcement in panels, curtain spaces and reinforcement. 6- Basin curtains calculation drawing and quantity 7- Static, reinforced concrete calculations and detail drawings, reinforcement tables and quantities of domes and vaults by finite element method 8- 4 m in ribs. Possibility of automatic division of passing teeth 9-Parametric steel roof calculation 10-Additions of building inspection regulations 11-Possibility of solving projects compatible with ACI, Eurocode and SNIP codes 12-Automatic drawing of formwork and foundation plan sections with elevations and columns 12-Automatic drawing of stirrups in circular columns 13- Ability to define rigid basement floor numbers separately in X and Y in two different directions 14- Ability to write automatic section line, section name and section elevation in the formwork plan 15- Option to create bunch reinforcement 16- Scale parameter in column application. 17-Receiving all drawings at once. 18-Unable to define elements such as curtain, foundation in ifc command
 
Dear Bolvadinim, Where did you get the above list? ideYAPI has listed the possibilities that have been added to 6 versions and will be added on its official website and brochures. These announcements on the officially announced web page and brochures bind ideYAPI. Please indicate where you got this list from. Where and when was this announcement made to users?
 
Hello,
"Ismail Hakki Besler":27jt4grw" said:
Mr. Bolvadinim, Where did you get the above list. ideYAPI has listed the possibilities added and will be added to 6 versions on its official website and brochures. These announcements on the officially announced web page and brochures connect ideYAPI. Please Please indicate where you got this list. Where and when was this announcement made to users.
Question:Where and when it was announced to users: Answer: Address where the list was taken :
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
As you can see when you take a look at the structural net forum pages, views were exchanged on the new version of İdeSTATİK. The topics we discussed in the following were first made here. Many names such as our dear beta user cassabotanic, participated in these discussions, etc. The following list about the new version works ARG It was announced under the title of News from E on 03-04-2008, 09:34. Although this announcement is not on the official website of IdeYAPI, IdeYAPI's current information regarding the possibilities in the list content There does not seem to be any objection. Links to other web pages.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
At that time Cassabotanic , Kutlu Muhendislik some users made these announcements in the forum you mentioned. ideYAPI did not object even when very serious attacks were made on ideCAD products in the same forum. Because such platforms are virtual platforms. Participants participate in discussions with their virtual identities. ideYAPI, which does not object even when there is an attack, did not object to the informative lists. Because these announcements only bind the announcer. This forum is the official forum site of ideYAPI. Here is a virtual platform. The articles on this site also link the authors. On this site, only admin gives official opinion on behalf of ideYAPI. İsmail Hakkı BESLER
 
"Ismail Hakki Besler":2fmxdq0y" said:
At that time some users such as Cassabotanic , Kutlu Muhendislik made these announcements in the forum you mentioned. ideYAPI did not object even when very serious attacks were made against ideCAD products in the same forum. such platforms are virtual platforms. Participants participate in discussions with their virtual identities. ideYAPI, which does not object even when there is an attack, did not object to the informative lists, because these announcements are only binding on the announcer. This forum is the official forum site of ideYAPI. A platform. The articles on this site also bind the authors. Only admin gives an official opinion on behalf of ideYAPI on this site. İsmail Hakkı BESLER
Thank you for the explanation İsmail Hakkı Bey, What I understood from your answer is that there are various As IdeYAPI, we did not make the necessary explanation for the explanations about the new version on the sites, the features announced on those sites do not bind IdeYAPI, because they do not. I guess you mean that there is nothing to be done about those features right now.. While on the same sites, Faruk SAKA saw that the brain made a statement for the speculations about the new program uprade prices, on the related sites, the speculations about the ideCAD Static new version features, which were announced many times, made public opinion correct and ideal. You did not feel the need to inform from the official mouth. See Faruk Bey's statement on the relevant site on 25-12-2008, 22:28.
Dear Forum Users, There have been speculations on the ideCAD Static 6 upgrade price for a while. In the face of this situation, we felt the need to inform first-hand about ideYAPI's upgrade policy and prices. ideYAPI has been requesting an upgrade fee for the new versions it has released from its establishment until today and its users are informed that they will pay an upgrade fee for future versions during the program purchase phase . An indefinite and free warranty on the upgrade is never given. Intermediate versions released on the same version are reflected free of charge to users. The fee required for the transition from version 5.511 to version 6 varies between 800 YTL and 2000 YTL. The reason for this is that the 5 versions used in the market are 4 different packages. With its 6 versions, ideYAPI has made significant reductions in product prices and has released 6 versions in a single package. While determining the price of the 6 versions, the economic conditions of our country and the world were taken into account, and they were put into service by applying the necessary discounts and maturity conditions. You can get more detailed information on the subject from our Bursa, Istanbul offices or authorized regional representatives. I wish you all success in your work. Faruk Saka / ideYAPI General Coordinator
 
This binds ideYAPI. This statement of Mr. Faruk Sakan is valid. Exactly as you say. ideYAPI official statement does not bind ideYAPI. For both new users and old users who upgrade. Before purchasing or upgrading the program, extensive information is given about the program possibilities. The program possibilities within the scope of version 6 are given in the form of a list. İsmail Hakkı BESLER
 
We misunderstood the news announced through unofficial channels, we are too naive, you are right.. The issue is understood..
 
"evrenor59":3ci4cey7" said:
I see a contradiction to idestruct in every article of Bolvadinli, I wonder why. If he doesn't like this program and doesn't find it sufficient, why doesn't he switch to another program. He persistently abuses and uses it. Isn't this an insult to so many users. We moved from the program to ide. Let me point this out in six parentheses...
Dear evronor59, Your contrast is wrong, I have liked and used ideYAPI programs after researching them. It's a good question you ask why it doesn't pass..My answer is this.Is there any other alternative hand, we are used to it.. Have you ever gotten out of a Mercedes and got into a domestic car? It's the same for me at ideYAPI, ours is not malicious criticism, constructive criticism, sincerely..
 
Criticism is nice, but let's be constructive. You need to understand both sides without offending anyone. we, the impatient idebuild group, do not offer us the innovations made before the tests are finished. I think it would be better to say when will these new possibilities happen or if they have been taken into R&D. good work everyone.
 
We think that the purpose of opening this forum is to solve some problems and to deliver user requests to the authorities. Otherwise, we must think that ideYapı has opened this forum to praise it, which we cannot believe anyway. 10 years ago, when we were the users of these programs, we could not even read the words of those who advised us to be patient, persevering and even (!!!) to switch to other programs. We have been supporting, using, promoting, admiring ideyapı for 10 years, and naturally we also express some of its shortcomings. We are one of the oldest idestruct users in this forum. therefore, our right to speak is not equivalent to those at the beginner level. Our criticisms are more useful than some beta users showing up on the forum as if it were a significant topic, mentioning that they put a plate on four columns and then transferred it to Sap2000. This is why we write. We will continue to write.
 
I have been using this program for sixteen years. Of course we will make our criticisms and suggestions, but I made a note that it would not be offensive There was no other purpose. maybe i misunderstood
 
"saridurmus":3kpd9kah" said:
I have been using this program for sixteen years. Of course we will make our criticisms and suggestions, but I made a note that it would not be offensive. There was no other purpose. I guess I was misunderstood
Dear Saridurmuş, I could not understand your misunderstanding. .First of all, I would like to thank you for your suggestions and constructive attitude.. I apologize if I have behaved in a misunderstanding towards you, but there is no such intention and situation.. You mentioned that you have been an ideCAD user for sixteen years, I wish you many more sixteen years.. In other words, since 93-94, there was no ideMİMAR program yet, with the ideSTATİK 6.04 version if I remember correctly. There was no CD in those years, you remember, I mean the version loaded on the floppy disk. IdeSTATİK 6.04 versions and documents stored on the floppy disk are still in my archive somewhere... I have been following the program since I met IdeYAPI. what he is doing.. If you remember in those years, computers were not as advanced as they are now, there were not enough computers in official institutions, I have been working in municipal science works for about ten years. Remember the first versions of Windows, if I'm not mistaken, we learned how to use a mouse in 90-91 years. Again, there was AutoCAD relase14 version in those years. Computer drawing was not common. After the Marmara earthquake, things got serious and the computer usage rate increased rapidly. Why did I write these: The events that developed over a long period of time forced IdeYAPI to be in development. I started using IdeYAPI v3.04 (Architectural IDS and STATIC IDS), which was released in 1999, and then we continued with ideYAPI 4.01 Architecture and Static, which excited me a lot. Then we came to ideYAPI Architecture and Static Professional 5 version, then ideYAPI Architecture and Static Enterprise 5, and then ideYAPI Architecture and Statik 6.0051 versions.. During this process, we never talked on the forum pages of other sites. To talk about it, ide was not on the FORUM PAGE. When the time comes, in this FORUM, as a necessity of his speech, "in an understanding that knows what he is saying" I do not find it appropriate for the users who write in the forum to be sensitive to the articles written as the addressee of IdeYAPI, without being related to the valuable forum users here. I do not have the right to look at this forum. BECAUSE THE MODARATOR OF THIS SITE I'm NOT.. The friend who puts himself in the place of the Moderator says "why are you criticizing and using it at the same time" my answer is "Everyone should mind their own business" the address of my articles is certain, there is no point in stretching or diluting the event.. I have already briefly mentioned why I continue to use it above. Once again Let me explain the reason. We are not just STATIC users, we are users of the ARCHITECTURE program. The integration of the two programs with each other and the absence of such integrated alternatives in the market made us choose IdeYAPI. If there is another program that offers both programs on the same logic, tell me about those programs. Let's be a user of it..Also, I'm sorry to give up on a program that has been a habit and addiction for so many years. It means "EASY TO DIVORCE A SINGLE WIFE". I think our dear friend who made the relevant recommendation is probably "SINGLE".. With IdeYAPI, we users are like a FAMILY. There are arguments and fights, every time we have fights and arguments, it's always "DIVINCING-DIS" I need to..We have until now "flirted" with another ....CAD company and did not bring any other program on IdeYAPI.. If we need to bring it, we can bring it, this is our choice, not with anyone's suggestion.. Thank you..
 
Hello, While reading the forum page given by Bolvadinim
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
I came across the following article written by cassabotanic
Column beam junction shear safety control, they have added a user interface that will facilitate better analysis and recovery of unsaved joins, by the way, I learned from the technical service. Levent did not tell the details. However, as I understand, the job of not saving and enlarging the columns and changing the accessories as soon as the reinforcements pass has been automated as far as I understand
If the technical service informs us about the "better analysis" mentioned by the technical service, I will be happy.
 
"civil1979":2vfv6dg3" said:
Hello while reading the forum page given by Bolvadinim
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
to the following article written by cassabotanic I came across
In the column beam joint shear safety control, they added a user interface that will facilitate better analysis and recovery of unsaved joints, by the way, I learned from the technical service. He did not tell the details, Mr. Levent. As far as I understand, the work has been automated
I will be happy if the technical service informs us about the "better analysis" mentioned by the technical service.
I will inform you. The excess reinforcement on the support has a negative effect on the column beam shear safety control. He can intervene as he wishes. Choosing the incoming pile assembly and additional and flat reinforcements with another algorithm, taking into account the column beam shear safety. This is a job done in version 6. I am not technical service but I hope you are happy.
 
Mr. cassabotanic
They added a user interface that will facilitate better analysis and recovery of non-recovery joints in the column beam joint shear safety check
I asked this question based on your sentence. I am using idecad 6.0051. And because I couldn't see the "user interface" you mentioned above in the program, I asked this question. Also, if this is not an interface but an algorithm, I am asking this question to the technical service because I am curious about the logic of this algorithm. I was also happy that the question I asked to the technical service was answered by you. After all, knowledge multiplies when it is shared. Best regards
 
In the same project, in versions 5 and 6, look at the column beam shear safety situations. Some situations that did not save in 5 became possible in 6 as well. In version 5, we were manually interfering with the reinforcements and making them salvage. In version 6, this work has been automated. The technical service may not know the algorithm. You have to ask Arge. I don't think they say what the algorithm is either. Good work
 
Mr. cassabotanic As you mentioned, we were trying to make safe connections that did not save the column beam connection shear safety by interfering with the beam reinforcements in v5. I misunderstood what you mean by "user interface". Then there is no innovation in the user interface that R&D does, but only improvement in the reinforcement selection algorithm. Did I misunderstand or was it really an interface for calculating column beam joint shear safety by defeating the user interface? Best regards
 
Hi cassabotanic, I just perceived this program as an old user (experienced) and a new user (without experience), I wrote it for him, and you joined the ide family after me. I joined the ide in older versions and I have been using the architectural product in the same way since the beginning. Anyway, I wrote to some friends that you are new, I am old, I will criticize more than you, because I sensed the image. Let's not get into such polemics, I'm sorry I misunderstood. Of course we will criticize. Look, you've passed all the stages. You could have written your assessment in a language more appropriate for that friend. Many things were done in this program compared to the year 91. At first, like you, I talked on the phone because there was no chat environment at that time. I kept asking questions. In fact, I will never forget our face-to-face meeting with Mr. Ismail. It was at the 1995 building fair. When I stood up because I had a question in the question section of the seminar, although we had never met, the whole hall looked at me when I said, "Come on, Ibrahim". He said, "You have come all the way from Anatolia to ask questions by phone". I think you understand what I mean. Let's ask questions, but let's not be offensive.
 
Back
Top