Would such a design be correct?

P

poladov

New Member
hello dear friends.. first of all, let me state the reason for adding the project: we know that idecad is a really nice, useful and reliable program. but ultimately a professional analysis and calculation, drawing program. Most of my civil engineer friends will also admit that we have a lot of shortcomings in their inner world. The wrong choice lessons learned while studying have been the regrets of many of us. For example, not taking the building dynamics course.. Let me come to you. It is a program produced by people who do not have much commercial concerns in my opinion.. I changed my name so that the valuable idecad family would not be exposed too much.. :) I think it's a shame for me not to know.. you went to school but you are incapable of learning, what a pity !! I ask you to interpret the attached project out of my helplessness, it is still in the design phase, but believe me, if I gave it as it is, no one would say it didn't happen.. wall loads, linear loads and others have not been entered yet. ://s6.dosya.tc/server6/u4sdhn/2622_taslak.rar.html]http://s6.dosya.tc/server6/u4sdhn/2622_taslak.rar.html[/url]
 
First of all, I would like to thank you for your interest and concern.. I will not take this project at the expense of losing other works. - The contractor will take the project to another civil engineer, maybe he will draw a worse project than this and submit it to a report. Then that friend will be a good engineer and I will be a bad engineer who can't., - later this will spread, first of all, this legend will start with friends from our own profession.. - my motivation will deteriorate. I will want to quit this job again. - motivational disorders... - nervous stress.. etc. etc.. as a working principle, I first create such a draft project to have an idea, then I consult with the architect and clarify accordingly, and add my loads such as balcony loads, beam wall loads, etc. There is a duplex floor here, but I bought it as a full floor. .. in general, I solve it more than once in the draft project.. so this is not the finished version. I'm not finishing this project anyway.. but I know that a friend will come out and solve this project similar to this one.. then I did and I made the considerations... how we should interpret the mass participations in the report.. how do we understand where we will be involved by looking at the deformation.. it's a pity, but to those who understand.. tell me this job, let me be a victim..... with my best regards...
 
Thank you brother Nedim, may Allah make it easy for fellow engineers... those who really want to do hard work...
 
Dear colleague, When you put forward your criteria to solve the project properly, both the architect and the owner will know if they will consider them, and you are not the one who can't do the project, but a conscious engineer who wants to make a model as it should be, when the building comes up in the future, what smart my engineer friend did not deal with the criticism of which reason he served and solved such a system; You will be the one who will be comfortable mentally and conscientiously. Moreover, it is not unsolvable in the model, but when my previous views are followed, the system will already become acceptable. When a structure is exposed to external lateral loads such as earthquakes and winds, it will want to be displaced in order to absorb the energy. In this displacement, it will be displaced depending on the direction of the lateral load, the position of the mass and stiffness points, and the eccentricity ratios. Of course, in order to absorb this load, the building will be translated or rotated the way it is easiest to shift. The displacement in the 1st mode gives an idea about the weakness of the building, the building first wants to be translated and/or rotated in that direction. If attention is paid to your model, in almost every mode, the weakest area in the sharpest part is displaced. The left area is architecturally very rigid due to the fact that the elevator curtain is here, the perimeter curtains on the bottom floor also contribute to the rigidity, and the framelessness in the south region, which I mentioned before, creates a situation that triggers displacement. If I were you, I would invite the architect and the owner to the office, I would show the deformation animation, then I would make the alternative solution and show it, the decision is yours, this is the case, if you say alternative solution, I will continue the project, otherwise I would say find a brave engineer. Best regards... G.KÖSE
 
thank you very much for your interest ... you are the people I will take as an example ... may Allah increase your knowledge.. best regards ..
 
Look at the modal's contribution to mass participation. The deformations created by the models whose mode contribution is almost zero have no effect on the overall behavior of the building. The result of the Response spectrum that should be noted here is the combined deformations and combined end forces that occur in columns, beams, walls and plates.
 
Is it possible, Mr. Ismail, to expand your advice a little more? What should I (do) do in order to fully understand what you are saying. Maybe my other friends will also benefit from it in my case. I mean, it could be a book recommendation or a course.. What would your recommendations be? Is there a video narration that seriously examines the results of the analysis? In order not to lose all the materials to be spent in construction from the national wealth, most importantly, we need to work harder in order not to damage a person's hair, and such videos contribute positively to our profession. It can be understood as being ready, but the other way is the same bath conversation.
 
"poladov":298tl2dl" said:
If I ask Mr. Ismail, is it possible for you to elaborate your advice a little more..? What should I (do) do so that I can fully understand what you are saying? it can be a course.. what are your recommendations? is there a video narration that seriously examines the results of the analysis? It can be understood as being ready, but the other way is the conversation of the same stone, the same bath.. My dear colleagues, who do not spare their valuable comments and guide us without any benefit, my brothers and sisters, etc.. I am so glad you exist. ..
Click to expand...
I couldn't download your project because my virus program warned me. if i can download your project. I can get back to you. In general, consider the referrals recommended in this topic. What I want to say is that modal displacements alone do not matter much. These displacements can only give an idea. The main considerations are the combined final displacements and the relative storey displacements. The effect or contribution of each mode is related to the mass contribution of that mode. If you list mods by mass participation ratios rather than by periods (if you do modal analysis with Ritz vectors in the program), the mods listed at the beginning are much more important. The mods listed below are less important. In reinforced concrete buildings, the decreasing order of the modal contributions is mostly the same in decreasing order of the period values. Earthquake regulations consider 90% Mode participation sufficient. This means that after 90% participation, you can ignore the 10% contribution models according to the regulation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top