Re: Wind load It is currently not possible to define a bar element with variable cross section in ideStatik. I also requested that this feature be included in the software in future versions. Currently, in the software, a 55-meter-high bar element can be divided into many pieces of equal length, and a different pipe profile section can be assigned to each piece and modeling can be made for an approximate design. As you increase the number of segmented parts, the results you get will get closer to the results of a modeling that can be done with a variable section. In order to stay on the safe side in such a modeling, it would be better if the pipe section section you assign for each sectioned bar is the smallest diameter of the variable section corresponding to that section along the length of the relevant bar. You don't need to build and calculate this pole with finite elements (shell elements). It will be sufficient to define it with a stick model. You can use the 7.xx articles of the TS EN 1991-1-4 standard or the ASCE 7-10 article 29.5 to define the linear wind load, which will affect the bar profile and change its value at certain heights (both due to pipe diameter and height), Since it contains design information directly for this type of building elements, it will make healthier directions. dynamic effects etc. Assuming that the effects will be taken into account in addition to this, you can get the linear load values that you can calculate by multiplying the m² load you have determined with the drag coefficient (drag coefficient, unitless) and the pipe diameter, the value of which is 1.2 for circular sections. You can make an approximate calculation by defining these values separately in ideStatik as linear loads calculated with their respective diameters to the segmented bar elements. Especially since a 55 meter long steel profile flagpole requires a design that needs serious consideration, I suggest you consider the specific reference "ANSI/NAAMM FP1001-97, 5th Ed., Guide Specifications for Design of Metal Flagpoles". It would be appropriate to make an integrated design in which the aerodynamic load coefficient of the flag, which I predict will be large with the dynamic effects of wind loads, is handled and the dynamic responses of the mast (resonance, etc.) are also examined.