What are my general mistakes in the project?

suatelmas

New Member
HELLO FRIENDS IN THE PROJECT I HAVE ATTACHED; 1. HOW CAN I TRANSPORT THE STAIR FLOOR DIFFERENTLY 2. I WANT TO SOLVE THE FOUNDATION AS A RADIATE FOUNDATION AND A CONTINUOUS FOUNDATION BECAUSE THERE IS NO BASEMENT FLOOR IN THE BUILDING ONLY AT THE RADIATE FOUNDATION AND THE CONTINUOUS FOUNDATION OF THE RADIATE FOUNDATION 3. THE GENERAL COMMENTARY OF THE GENERAL PROEJEDIMA GREEN JUNE2. K0:2160 t/m3 A0: 0.30 Z3 TA:0.15 TB:0.60
 
Re: PROJECT DEFECTS Hello My suggestions; -- Since there is no flooring on the ground floor, you have to solve the semi-rigid diaphragm, when I make a semi-rigid calculation, it gives 15 errors. --I suggest you add Earthquake Curtain, --Fix the errors in geometry control, --Reduce the attic floor loads and remove the wall loads, --Check the correct support conditions of the stairs and solve them together, --No elevator machine flooring? --one. don't the stairs go down to the floor on the floor? --Check the wall loads, there should be no walls in each beam, --Connect the columns on the B and O axis on the ground floor with the beam, --Let the rib beams center the columns, --1. put rib dirt on the edge of floor D7-D9 tiles, --1. If the D8 slab on the floor does not deflect, rotate it, --1. You can put beams on the outer parts of the floor as in the upper floors, --P01 curtain perimeter beam combinations were not good, there are many stuck columns, if you can put them in, --P01 curtain perimeter should be fixed on the 1st floor. It's easy Ünver ÖZCAN
 
In addition to what Unver said; * On the 1st floor, S3, S34 column pierces the floor, it is not connected to any beam. * You made ribbed flooring on this floor (1st floor), even on this floor, you did not connect the B and O axes mentioned by Ünver Bey with beams. * Your curtains stand idle. It does not contribute to the system, the curtain P1 is only connected in the Y direction. P2 curtain is only connected to other curtains. * On the 1st floor, the 25/50 beams on the right and left of the P1 curtain are connected to the lower 50/30 beams. Definitely fix it. * Divide the K1 and K25 beams into three parts (four on the other train), whereas I recommend combining beams K31-32 with 63-64. There are issues like this on other floors as well. (such as beams in front of the stairs, K74-75, etc.) * If you have the opportunity to place columns on the right and left of the stairs, you can connect the beam with the curtain. * Unver asked, "Is there a wall load on each beam?" If there is no wall on each beam, it sounds like there may be walls on the floor, check your loads. * At least, since there are consoles at the top and bottom, it would be good to have amps on those fronts, basically. * Since your floor live loads on all floors are 0.2, I would like to remind you that making the floors too thick is not a plus, but also a negative in terms of the mass of the building. I wish you good work. N. YILMAZ
 
What should we take the wall load and live load for beams that do not have a wall on the normal floor plan. Should it be the same as the floor load for a beam running through the center of the room? What should be the floor loads on the attic, we usually get 200 kg. Can it be 100? Also, when drawing stairs, should we draw zeros on the beams or do they overflow.. -What is the connection requirement in the b and o axes above. In my city, they make 1.5m cantilevers and they do not connect the internal columns, the municipality approves the projects :o
 
* For the wall passing through the middle of the room, you either enter the system as a linear load or add 150 kg to the floor live load. * There is an option in the load library for loft rooms. There is no harm in making cantilevers on OB axles. * But if you don't connect any of the BOTH OUTER COLUMNS throughout the entire building, this would not be a correct structural system design, of course. Although there is no clear article about this in the regulation, I know that there is a control article about it in the building inspection control sheets.
 
Hello
"sultanfatih":3ny0rq80" said:
-what is the connection requirement on b and o axes above, they make 1.5m consoles in my city and they do not connect internal columns, municipality approves projects
"NYILMAZ":3ny0rq80" said:
building inspection control I know that there is a control clause about this in their leaflets.
There is no such requirement in the regulation, but it is in the building inspection leaflet. Some municipalities and building inspection firms take a principle decision together and do not accept projects that are not connected. I think it is useful to connect it to create a frame. Ünver ÖZCAN
 
thanks for your answer. I do it, but contractors, architects complain about it and show those who don't, I can't explain that it is necessary.
 
Hello, first of all, thank you for your comments. Since the column between the B and O axis you mentioned prevents the usage area on the ground floor (in the shop), I will remove it and analyze the whole building as a hollow block. Also, a basement floor is not desired in the building, and the fact that there is no statically rigid floor does not fit my logic, I hope you can help me in these two issues.
 
It does not have to be a rigid floor. Why should this bother you? Sometimes buildings have basements or even more than one. However, since none of them are curtains, they do not act as rigid floors. Therefore this is not a problem. It was the right approach to take precautions for the O and B axles.
 
Back
Top