Tutorial Video Taking Architectural Drawings as Base

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Tutorial Video: Taking Architectural Drawings as Base. Click to watch:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[proisa]

Re: New Educational Video Take Architectural Drawings as a Base Hello, I wanted to share something while a training video was being made on this subject. In ideCad, we do not have a problem in taking the architectural project as a base. However, although we do not take unnecessary layers, it works much slower than ideCad CAD drawing programs in crowded 2D drawings. This is the same not only with the 2D drawings we receive from outside, but also with the static drawings we create in large-scale projects. Especially in steel projects with a lot of drawings and details, the computer has a lot of difficulty. Do you plan to make an optimization here? Secondly, we have many difficulties in converting the project we received as an architectural base to the carrier system with the 2D architectural project arrow command. That's why we can't use this method to work faster. We create the elements such as columns, curtains and beams one by one by simply taking the base and locating the elements. My colleagues who use ideCAD around me also do data entry in the same way. In the 2D architecture arrow section, only the axis and columns reading part works. None of the others work. While reading the axis, the axis shape in the architectural project is exactly the same. (Circle diameter, font, colors, etc.) Our default standard axle types are changing. We have a problem reading the columns. Namely; The local axes of the columns do not coincide with the global axis. Even the columns of the same size and placement, the local axes point in different directions. Column growth directions need to be adjusted according to the local axes of each column. Since this is very annoying, instead of dealing with it, we create each element one by one. When it is necessary to analyze the system and make changes in column dimensions, it is necessary to intervene in all column misalignments. I want the local axes of all columns created by the 2D architectural project reading method to coincide with the global axis, as it will make our work much easier for myself.

 

[YasinTezel]

Re: New Tutorial Video Take Architectural Drawings as Base Hello

In ideCad, we do not have any problems with taking the architectural project as a base. However, although we do not take unnecessary layers, ideCad CAD drawings are used in crowded 2D drawings. It works much slower than other programs. This is not only in the 2D drawings we import from outside, but also in the static drawings we create in large-scale projects. Especially in steel projects with a lot of drawings and details, the computer has a lot of difficulty. Do you plan to make an optimization here?

Too long When working with layouts, there may be slowness in commands such as pan / zoom. I take your suggestions for optimization in our notes. As a suggestion, it may be more appropriate to perform 2D editing in single drawings and combine the layouts before printing.

Secondly, the architectural base We are trying to transform the project we received as a carrier system with the 2D architectural project arrow command We are experiencing many difficulties. That's why we can't use this method to work faster. We create the elements such as columns, curtains and beams one by one by simply taking the base and locating the elements. My colleagues who use ideCAD around me also do data entry in the same way. In the 2D architecture arrow section, only the axis and columns reading part works. None of the others work. The local axes of the columns do not coincide with the global axis. Even the columns of the same size and placement, the local axes point in different directions. Column growth directions need to be adjusted according to the local axes of each column. Since this is very annoying, instead of dealing with it, we create each element one by one. When it is necessary to analyze the system and make changes in column dimensions, it is necessary to intervene in all column misalignments.

The use of Axes and columns with the 2D Architecture Read command helps to create a suitable and fast model under certain conditions. As you said, the command does not work in other elements. However, after the axis and columns are translated from the architecture, modeling can be done quickly without entering information such as size / angle. In architecture, if the columns are placed from the corner, the column growth limits are determined correctly. However, if the columns are placed off-axis, it is necessary to arrange the column growth limits according to the wall / floor boundaries. The column local axes pointing in different directions does not pose any problem for analysis,

When reading the axes, the axis shape is exactly the same as in the architectural project (Circle diameter, font, colors, etc.) Our default standard axis types are changing. We have a problem reading the columns, namely:

Trying to convert the axis label type to architecture similar to the one. If you don't want it, select all the converted axes and use the "Load default settings" command, the axis properties in the project will be used.

I want the local axes of all the columns created by the 2D architectural project reading method to coincide with the global axis, as it will make our work much easier for myself.

I take your request in our notes.

 

[proisa]

Re: New Tutorial Video Take Architectural Drawings as Base

The use of Axes and columns with the 2D Architecture arrow command helps to create a suitable and fast model under certain conditions. The command does not work on the elements.But after the axis and columns are rotated from the architecture, modeling can be done quickly without entering information such as size / angle.In architecture, if the columns are placed from the corner, the column growth limits are determined correctly. However, if the columns are placed off-axis, this can be done according to the column growth limits according to the wall / floor boundaries. It needs to be arranged. It is not a problem for the analysis if the local axes of the columns look in different directions,

Hello Mr. Yasin. I know that the local axes of the local axes pointing in different directions are not a problem in terms of analysis. At the same time, it would be unreasonable to ask the program to know in which direction the axially misaligned columns will grow. That's not the problem, with architectural concerns We usually cannot use the columns that are placed, whose direction and dimensions are determined, and we have to intervene in the dimensions. For example; After reading the 2D architectural project, I want any of the elements that we have converted to a column to grow and shrink to the left and down in the plan, and I mark this in the column settings dialog. However, it is necessary to determine which direction I marked in the global corresponds to the local axes of the column, one by one for each column. If this is resolved, I think using columns in the architecture will work just fine.