torsion and weak storey irregularity HELP

profesyonel

New Member
hello.. I will tell you at length, you will get tired while you are reading, so in summary, I could not overcome the known irregularities due to the basic level, high floor and narrow length of the building. I need the opinions of my esteemed elders. Thank you.
 
Hi, Irregularities of type A1 and b2 are irregulars that affect the reason for choosing the calculation method. When dynamic analysis is performed, these irregularities have no effect according to the method. However, if it is desired to reduce these irregularity coefficients below the limit value, it is necessary to increase the stiffness of the carrier system in the relevant direction. In B1 type irregularity, the regulation allows the nth value to be between 06-08. If the nth value is between 0.6-0.8, the R coefficient is multiplied by the 1.25th(min) value as specified in TDy2007 item 2.3.2.3 and considered as the selected R coefficient. Determinations for data entry: *Foundations are entered in the basement on the right side of the project, but the column is not entered. It would be appropriate to enter the columns by giving an elevation on the basement floor. *Foundation piece remained under the S26 column. *There seems to be an inconsistency between the soil bearing coefficient and the soil tension... *I think that for soil group C or D... C and D group soils, the regulation requires the consideration of foundation rotations and displacements. For this reason, it is recommended that the foundation system be designed as a beamless raft and analyzed according to the Superstructure interactive solution option. (Stress control on rafter raft foundation in the program is done only according to vertical loads.) Good work.
 
"Levent Özpak":10azii1u" said:
Hello, Irregularities of type A1 and b2 are irregularities that affect the reason for choosing the calculation method. When dynamic analysis is performed, these irregularities have no effect according to the method. However, if these irregularity coefficients are to be reduced below the limit value, the carrier in the relevant direction is It is necessary to increase the system rigidity.The regulation also allows the nci value to be between 06-08 in B1 type irregularity. If the nci value is between 0.6-0.8, the R coefficient is multiplied by the 1.25th(min) value as specified in TDy2007 item 2.3.2.3 and the selected R coefficient is Determinations for data entry: *Foundations on the right side of the project are entered in the basement, but the column is not entered. It would be appropriate to enter the columns by giving an elevation in the basement floor. *Foundation piece remained under the S26 column. *Between the ground bearing coefficient and the ground tension. There seems to be an incompatibility... *I think soil group C or D... C and D group soils are based on the Regulation. Me and displacements are requested to be taken into account. For this reason, it is recommended that the foundation system be designed as a beamless raft and analyzed according to the Superstructure interactive solution option. (Stress control on beamed raft foundation in the program is done only according to vertical loads.) Thank you very much, Mr. Levent, I have one more question in my mind, finally, would you recommend me to make a staggered or monolithic plate foundation, because Good work
thank you but I have a problem. There is 1 more question. Would you recommend that I do the slab flooring in stages or in one piece?
 
"professional":3mo0soxw" said:
thank you, but I have one more question in my mind. Would you recommend that I make the slab flooring in stages or in one piece?
If possible, in one piece ... But if not, you can enter gradually.
 
Back
Top