"EVCEN":21uigbik" said:
I contacted by phone and received remote assistance. Thanks for your support...
Hello, I am writing the details of the conversation here so that forum participants can have an idea about the subject.
"EVCEN":21uigbik" said:
IN MY ATTACHED PROJECT, I CANNOT CONNECT S09 AND S12 COLUMN IN A KIND.
During our phone conversation, you said that "You can draw beams between S9-12 columns, but there is a CAS(-) problem. CAS(-) problem is caused by a lack of stirrups. Stirrup is larger than the beam reinforcement selection dialog. The problem is solved by choosing the diameter
"EVCEN":21uigbik" said:
I DESIGNED THE K32 BEAM THAT WAY, BUT THE BEAMS ARE NOT STABLE WHY ?
There is no problem in the connections of the beams connected to the K32 beam. From the Beam Information and Static Results reports, you can see that beams K09 and K12 are connected to K32.
"EVCEN":21uigbik" said:
TOO MUCH REINFORCEMENT IN K04 BEAM?
Since K04 Beam is shorter and more rigid than other beams in the model created, it seems normal that bending moments are higher
"EVCEN":21uigbik" said:
REINFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE BASEMENT FLOOR COLUMNS WHY DO I WAITING FOR YOUR EMERGENCY HELP WHY I WANT YOUR EMERGENCY HELP WHEN THERE ARE 10FI14 REINFORCEMENTS IN ALL COLUMNS ON AN UPPER FLOOR THANKS
Columns are more difficult in the basement. Arrangements can be made in the direction of the columns and the carrier system by enlarging the dimensions of the columns and providing less strain on the columns. Some other notes; -I recommend modeling P01 and O02 curtains as shells. -It seems that the wall height is entered as 1 meter for the wall loads in the beam settings. Adjust the wall heights appropriately or use the automatic height option. -Review typical rib continuities. -Evaluate the solution option according to the semi-rigid diaphragm method. Good work