The soil stress at the continuous foundation appears to be "0".

A

antediluvian35

New Member
Z2, B group Zem=20t/m2 sitting on a floor with a bearing coefficient of 4000; In a non-rigid basement + ground + 3-storey building (each floor is a single flat), when I have a foundation analysis done (I have a superstructure-free solution done), the ground stress appears as "0" (zero) after the analysis, except for my 4 continuous foundation beams. Despite this, the upper planes of these 50x50cm foundation beams vary between 6Ø14 and 8Ø14. Is this a normal situation, friends, it is a project that I need to raise urgently. I'm waiting for your help. My first post on this forum, excuse me. I'm getting a report. There is no problem, but what is the reason for this situation in the foundation beams? Am I making a mistake somewhere?
 
Hello, The fact that the ground tension appears to be zero in continuous foundations is due to incorrect data entry. In the foundation system, some foundations may be under the column object, the foundation joint points may not always coincide on the column, etc... We recommend that you check your basic data according to the situations above. If you can't solve the problem, you can attach the project file. Good work
 
Levent, first of all, thank you very much for your interest. cde extension file is 6.22mb so it didn't allow me to add it, how can I send it. I couldn't get through.
 
"antediluvian35":25vmf365" said:
I think I fixed the problem, but I'm not so sure if the basic combinations are error free. Here's the upload link. //www.webfilehost.com/?mode=viewupload&id=2777842[/url]
Click to expand...
S5-S7-S8 columns are not connected to foundations. From the Basic Information and Static Results[/b] report, it can be checked to which element the foundations are connected from the left and right ends.
 
I'm sorry, Mr. Levent, I've been dealing with project work for 7-8 months yet. Thank you for your patience. I guess the columns you mentioned did not coincide with the axis intersections. I wanted to place the S7 column with offset, now I used offset after placing it at the axis intersection. I'm giving you a link again so you can check the current status. Do you have a problem with my transition to drawings this way?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
"antediluvian35":2vnmgrm3" said:
I'm sorry, Mr. Levent, I've only been working on the project for 7-8 months. Thank you for your patience. I think the columns you mentioned did not coincide with the axis intersections. I wanted to place the S7 column with offset, now after placing it at the axis intersection I used whack. I'm linking again so you can check the current status. Do you mind if I switch to the drawings this way.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
*TKB104-TKB113 and TKB114 Continuous Foundations do not connect to column S07. In my previous message, I said how you can check the elements to which the foundation is connected....
Continuous Fundamentals From the left and right ends of the foundations, it can be checked to which element the foundations are connected. you can see i.
Click to expand...
 
In the optional reports section, I did not check the 'Continuous basic information and static results' tab, now I saw your warning when I checked it. Thank you very much, Mr. Levent. Have a nice day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top