The mall

gokhanv3

New Member
hi friends, I had 2 questions. Firstly, when I look at the reports in the project, there is no problem, but when I check the beams, the beam width cannot be more than the beam height and column width, it warns that the columns are 55*55, beams are 100*30 horizontal beams. Do you mind if the width of the single dimension beam I will play with from this point of view, in my 2nd question, cassette slab typical beam definition in cassette slab in geometric control gives an incorrect warning, I do not understand why, I could not add it because the project is large, thanks
 
Hello, 1-According to TDY 3.4.1.1 in your project, your beam width should not be more than the width of the column perpendicular to the beam + beam height. So, according to the example you gave, the beam width should not be more than 55+30=85 cm. If this condition is not met, the regulation will not be complied with. If you cannot change the beam height and width, you can increase the width of the column perpendicular to the beam. In 2-cassette flooring, typical beams may not be defined or their continuity may be faulty. You can define cassette floor typical beams with the Set typical beam command. Typical beams of continuous cassette floors should also be continuous. I've included a small example for your review. In the example, the green colored cassette beams are typical beams. Good work
 
In the cassette floor system I made, the geometry control says that the beam height condition is not met on my beamed floor, how can I solve this?
 
"muhammed47":he6s2kp3" said:
in the cassette tiled system I made, it says that the beam height condition is not met in the geometry control on my truss slab
You have too much clearance in your system. indisputable) In the relevant section of the relevant article of TS 500 on dimensions: "The free spacing between the teeth cannot be more than 700 mm in gear floors running in one direction. The thickness of the table cannot be less than 1/10 of the free tooth pitch and 50 mm, and the tooth width cannot be less than 100 mm. The ratio of the total tooth height (with the plate) to the free opening cannot be less than 1/20 in simple supported single-span slabs, 1/25 in continuous slabs, and 1/10 in consoles. " is called. In this case, I think the approximate height of the cassette beams of your floor = 12m / 20 = 0.60m Also advice: You should make the spacing of your cassette beams 40cm more than their width 10cm more. You will change their height anyway I say don't ignore the thought of connecting the columns with opposing beams. Also, review your load-bearing system behavior coefficient. You have curtains that do not continue on all floors.
 
"muhammed47":31kf03ml" said:
in the cassette tiled system I made, the geometry control says that the beam height requirement is not met on my truss floor, how can I solve this? In addition, the reinforcement axes of the slabs have been changed to flat+pile and console.Since the reinforcing axis of the cassette slab will be the distribution reinforcement, the reinforcement type should be chosen as flat reinforcement at the bottom. Good work.
 
"Levent Özpak":2pymi0b6" said:
"muhammed47":2pymi0b6" said:
in the cassette tiled system I made, the geometry control says that the beam height condition is not met on my truss slab, how can I solve this
Hello, The clear span of the cassette slab is 14.93 meters cassette The tooth height should be 75 cm due to the L/20 requirement. In addition, the reinforcement axles on the floors have been changed to flat+pile and console. Since the reinforcement axis of the cassette floor slab will be the distribution reinforcement, the reinforcement type should be chosen as flat reinforcement at the bottom. Good work
Mr. Levent, Thank you for your correction. For some reason, I took the short direction as the basis, I guess it must have always been the thought of passing beams.
 
hello take it easy. I am getting the error that the tooth height requirement is not met in the gear (rib / cassette) floors in the geometry control on the d13 slab on the ground floor. I reviewed the ts 500. seems to meet the conditions. When you make k103 and k102 beams 50/32, the error disappears. I do not understand unfortunately. I'd appreciate it if you could shed some light on how.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello
"3428":24olfncl" said:
hello, take it easy. I get the error that the tooth height condition is not met in the geometry control on the d13 slab on the ground floor. I examined the ts 500. It seems to meet the conditions. The k103 and k102 beams are 50/ When I do 32, the error disappears. I don't understand, unfortunately. I would appreciate it if you could enlighten me on how it happened.
As I have shown below, the slab edge comes to 641 cm. According to TS500 item 11.3.2, it becomes 641/20=30.05, so the height is not enough. Only the K103 beam is 50. Even if you make cm, the side length becomes 640 cm. 640/20=32 cm becomes sufficient PROGRAM COMMENT: When I saw this situation, my confidence in the program increased. Ünver ÖZCAN
 
Hello, I want to ask one more thing. In the project I shared, one piece of raft, but I want to solve the upper floors with dilatation. What analysis would you suggest? so what should i do better?
 
Hello. there must be sufficient dilatation space, --If the heights of the floors, the number of floors, the basement floor situation and the coefficients for R are the same in both directions, solve together.
 
Back
Top