The case of using design forces in automatic design

[k0ry]

Hello, I am designing a raft foundation under the Steel Building. I would place 70 cm high columns on the raft foundation where the base plates will sit. I added the relevant loadings to the G, Q, Ecx, Ecy loading situations in the automatic loading situation. The forces on the column are called "Reinforced Concrete-Column-Forces" In the section named "Reinforcement Areas", I was able to track that the program detects the loads. While all the states in the Automatic reinforced concrete design menu are active, I observed that some of the columns do not use the forces detected in the reinforced concrete design in the reinforced concrete design, and I checked that these forces are not used in the design in the report. (SCREEN SHIPPING HAS BEEN MADE FOR S1 COLUMN.) The relevant static file is attached. I present this situation regarding automatic reinforced concrete design to your valuable comments and wish you good work.

 

[Ismail Hakki Besler]

Re: The use of design forces in automatic design is stopped

Hi, I am designing a raft foundation under the Steel Building. I placed 70 cm high columns on the raft foundation where the base plates will sit. I added G,Q,Ecx,Ecy to the loading states, which are in the loading state. I was able to follow the forces on the column in the section called "Reinforced Concrete-Column-Forces-Reinforcement Fields" that the program detects the loads. While all the states in the automatic reinforced concrete design menu are active, some of the columns I observed that the forces were not used in the reinforced concrete design, I observed in the forces reinforcement areas tab and I checked that these forces were not used in the design in the report. The screen excerpts of this situation are below. (SCREEN SHIPPING IS MADE FOR S1 COLUMN.) The relevant static file is attached. I wish you good luck.

Enter the nodal point as the load. Or enter the load distance greater than 0.7. your columns are 0.70 cm, you enter 0.71 cm. Here, such a situation occurs when defining the load over the element. This is evident from the axial load diagrams of your columns. In this version, entering the 8,500 load distance larger than the column length solves the problem. If you enter the Node point, there is no problem anyway. We recorded this situation in our notes. We'll fix it in future updates. Thanks for your verification