System rigidity is not provided

Re: SYSTEM RIGIDITY IS NOT PROVIDED Hello My Suggestions: --Take the live load of 0.350 t/m2 on the floors, --Take the right and left consoles on the raft floor as much as the front and back, --You can rotate the P001 and P003 curtains for system rigidity It is very soon to meet the 0.008 requirement. If it is not balanced, you will increase the curtains a little. --Considering the floors next to the 60/32 beams in the long direction, it should not be less than 15*3=45 cm high, --Since you accept the building as hollow block, it should provide overturning >0.75, you need to add curtains to achieve this , (big curtains are needed.) --It is quite difficult to solve this structure with hollow floor block. In the front, there will be 45-15=30 cm beam sagging inside the halls-rooms. The cassette solution seems to be better, even if it's a bit pricey. Unver ÖZCAN
 
Hello there; The problem is that the earthquake parameters you entered do not belong to the coordinates you entered and your Ss value is 2 times greater. Please enter the correct information and try again. Best regards.
 
Re: SYSTEM RIGIBILITY IS NOT PROVIDED
"unver":3ub08wrd" said:
Hi My Suggestions: --Take the live load of 0.350 t/m2 for floors, --Take consoles as much as the front and back on the raft floor, --You can rotate P001 and P003 curtains for system rigidity. It's very close to satisfying the condition of 0.008. If it is not balanced, you will enlarge the curtains a little. -- Considering the flooring next to the 60/32 beams in the long direction, it should not be less than 15*3=45 cm high, Since you accept it, it should provide >0.75 for tipping, you need to add curtains to achieve this, (large curtains are needed.) --It is quite difficult to solve this structure with a hollow block. cm beam sag. Cassette solution seems to be better, even if it is a bit expensive. Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for your interest and answers, Mr. Unver. I corrected the raft, changed the direction of p001 and p003 and enlarged it a little, adjusted the floor loads and also the earthquake parameters. I corrected it and had it analyzed again. But it still says the relative floor drift is high. :cry:
 
"2m project":2q9gtuvu" said:
Hi; The problem is that the earthquake parameters you entered do not belong to the coordinates you entered, and your Ss value is 2 times greater. Please try again by entering the correct information. Best regards.
Click to expand...
first of all thanks.. I have corrected the values, but didn't happen.
 
Hello My suggestions; -- Your number one problem in this project is not system rigidity. If you do P004-P009 30/285 for this, it is solved. --The structure should provide >0.75 for tipping, you need to add a curtain to achieve this, --or if you choose high ductility (it dissolves) you will get rid of it (B) you will need to fix the errors,
"unver":fwm2b4jg" said:
--60/32 in the long direction Considering the floors next to the beams, it should not be less than 15*3=45 cm in height,
Click to expand...
You did not do what is necessary in this suggestion, (TS500 7.3 does not fit, it must be corrected) --Increase the raft floor reinforcement diameter, Ünver ÖZCAN
 
"unver":210kmeo0" said:
Hi My suggestions; --Your number one problem in this project is not system rigidity. It is solved if you do P004-P009 30/285 for this. --The structure should provide overturning >0.75, you need to add a curtain to ensure this , --or if you choose high ductility (it dissolves) you will get rid of (B) you will need to fix errors,
"unver":210kmeo0" said:
--Low height of 15*3=45 cm considering the flooring next to 60/32 beams in the long direction should not be,
Click to expand...
You did not do what is necessary in this suggestion, (TS500 7.3 does not fit, it must be corrected) --Increase the diameter of the raft flooring reinforcement, Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
I DOWNLOAD YOUR UNVER BEY ADDITIONAL BUT I CANNOT OPEN it??
 
"unver":30u2x6ia" said:
Hi My suggestions; --Your number one problem in this project is not system rigidity. It is solved if you do P004-P009 30/285 for this. --The structure should provide a tipping >0.75, you need to add a curtain to ensure this , --or if you choose high ductility (it dissolves) you will get rid of it (B) you will need to fix errors,
"unver":30u2x6ia" said:
--less than 15*3=45 cm height considering the flooring next to 60/32 beams in the long direction should not be,
Click to expand...
You did not do what is necessary in this suggestion, (TS500 7.3 does not fit, it must be corrected) --Increase the diameter of the raft flooring reinforcement, Ünver ÖZCAN
Click to expand...
Ünver, can you please review the project for the last time, I need to solve it now and other solution than writing it here I didn't think of it. I tried what they know, got help and tried again, still doesn't work
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello. You can continue your work with the attached project for the relative floor drift control. Coordinate and spectrum coefficients in your project were entered by first selecting DD1 ground motion in the TBDY 2018 wizard. The wizard has been registered. Then DD2 was re-entered for ground motion and the wizard was registered again. In the new version coming after 10.05, this way, the earthquake wizard will not need to be edited twice.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
There are unsupported beam and overlapping object messages in geometry control, you need to fix these errors. Note: The wizard was done offline, if you wish, you can define the earthquake parameters online as I wrote above.
 
Hi, it does not provide shear safety in the K249 beam, there is an incorrect column placement on the S03 column, fix it. Brace and untie the ladder with the building. Unver ÖZCAN
 
"HakanŞahin":24xrgzrv" said:
Hello You can continue your work with the attached project for the relative floor drift control. In your project, the coordinate and spectrum coefficients were entered in the TBDY 2018 wizard by first selecting DD1 ground motion. The wizard was recorded. Then again for DD2 ground motion. entered and the wizard was registered again. In the new version coming after 10.05, there will be no need to edit the earthquake wizard twice in this way.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Supportless beam and overlapping in geometry control There are object messages, you need to correct these errors Note: The wizard was processed offline, if you wish, you can define the earthquake parameters online as I wrote above.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much, Hakan :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top