German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish Mrb friends.. When I solve the project and examine the report, it says there is no error in the report, everything is as it should be, but there are creases that require suspension reinforcement in some stud creases. I solved the existing stirrups carefully in the suspension reinforcement calculation, one of the beam parameters, without ticking the option, but it didn't make any difference. I did a complete tightening of the crease, but it still didn't help.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Suspension Reinforcement
- Thread starter M.atalay
- Start date
HakanŞahin
Administrator
Hello, That statement in the report means that there are beams that require suspension reinforcement in the project and suspension reinforcement has been applied. Applied beam names are also listed below the expression. If you look at the beam drawings, you will see that suspension reinforcement is applied as a stirrup arrangement. Note : We will change that expression to be more understandable... Good work.
What is the suspension reinforcement situation for the cantilever beam with a beam at the end? Regarding suspension reinforcement in TS500 Section 8.1; It is said, "In cases where the support is arranged higher than the lower face of the beam and in the beams resting on another beam, the suspension reinforcement carrying the shear force on the beam should be arranged.". Isn't the goal of making suspension reinforcement here to meet the shear force? The program warns the beams that should already have suspension reinforcement and gives the necessary calculation and reinforcement. There are no stud beams in a project except for the simple beam attached to the end of the cantilever. In the outputs, the program gave the message "There is no beam that requires suspension reinforcement". However, the building inspection firm tends to see the beams I mentioned above as beams that require suspension reinforcement. Although stirrups are already 10 cm apart in that region, it is reported that stirrups should be tightened. The claim of the friends is that there is no article in the form of "in the regulations or in the TS500; there is no need for suspension equipment account in consoles". (that is, it should be requested.) I would like to get your opinions.