Suggestion for design

T

teknikisler

New Member
I made a design for a project in a region with a 1st degree earthquake zone, but I need the criticisms of those who are able to suggest errors in the design of the project I have attached, or it would be better if it were like this. I think another perspective might be good. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
 
I'm listing my own ideas; 1-I don't usually choose the column sizes below 35/60 2-I use 25/50 beams in hollow blocks; I use 25/50 beams in the sections above the walls 3- I take care to choose the rib directions in one direction (there are non-continuous ribs behind the cantilever ribs in your project, we recommend you to solve them in the same direction. 4-You have made some main beams and carrier consoles 30/32, it seems weak to me. I wouldn't do it below 50/32 or 60/32. I'm thinking about the possibility of joining balconies in the future) 6-I make sure that the cantilever beams are in the same direction with the beams that continue behind them (so that the angle of the ongoing reinforcements does not change, so that they work in one piece) Ex: K63-K64, K68-K69 ribs that exceed 7-4m, I dissolve it as a cassette tape and throw tie ribs. You can make 8-K7 K25 K31 beam lengths 100 cm. 9-Most importantly, there is no earthquake curtain in your system, make sure to turn some of the columns into curtains (don't be fooled by the low number of floors)
 
In my opinion, the 6th article mentioned by GETA is important in terms of the continuity of the beams and thus the reinforcements. In particular, the joining of 3-4 beams at an angle to each other leads to very bad situations in terms of reinforcement frequency at the joint points. The sample figure is from my construction site internship.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top