German 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Italian 
Arabic 
Russian 
Japanese 
Turkish You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sudden increase of reinforcement in the ground floor column
- Thread starter SonDurak
- Start date
Hello -- Since it is on the rigid floor, reinforcement increase is also normal in S04 and other outer columns (S20). When going down to the lower floors, there is a decrease in the reinforcement as the curtains carry the moments. --Fix the errors in the geometry control.(20 cm wide beam gets stuck in the column.) My suggestions --Do not solve the project with a rigid diaphragm, it does not fit the program logic without a double floor in between. --If you solve it semi-rigid according to version 7, it cannot be concluded. You need to correct the errors in the geometry control and make calculations. If you solve it semi-rigid according to the --8 version, it does the solution, but you have to correct the errors in the Geometry control and make calculations. You also need to fix calculation result errors. -- Since the first place of the building to collapse in the event of an earthquake will be the stairs, model the staircase correctly and solve it together with the system. -- WHEN THE EARTHQUAKE REGULATION CHANGES; SO THE SOLUTION WITH A RIGID DIAPHRAGM WILL BE AVOIDED, SOLVE ALL YOUR FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTIONS WITH A SEMI-RIGID DIAPHRAGM. Take it easy Unver ÖZCAN
For example, if they don't accept the project because you solved it, you can give a blank petition to the engineers in that municipality to resign."SonDurak":1mtc3mtr" said:Hello, the municipality does not want to accept two projects that I solved with the semi-rigid diaphragm method because of the solution method, how can I explain the compliance of this method with the regulation. I would appreciate your help, thanks...