Stud Beam Drawing

If you connect the beams to each other at the nodes, triangular gaps do not occur (which is correct). In this way, single lines with 45 degree angles are formed instead of triangular spaces. There is no problem with that either. Of course, it would be correct to connect the slab edges to the beam node points. Architecturally, it may correspond to the other thickness of the beam, but this is not a problem in terms of bearing and calculation. Instead, you can make simple corrections in 2D. If you don't want this to be visible visually, you can use the "solid model" option on the 3D screen.
 
I drew it many times, I was careful to connect it to the knot, but there may be something I missed. So the 45 degree gaps on the left are not a problem, right? Also, is there any harm in such gaps in the analysis phase?
 
You can handle problems with joins using the object trim method. It would be more correct to answer whether there will be a problem with the analysis by seeing the link. so if you add your project we can help. Good work.
 
"cilingir93":10a5y3as" said:
I have drawn many times, I have been careful to connect it to the node point, but there may be something I missed.
Click to expand...
If you add the project, we will see if there is a problem in data entry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top