Hello,
"uğur oflaz":22rujkrn" said:
A FRIEND OF OUR FRIEND IN THIS FORM HAS ADDED A CURTAIN TO THE ENTIRE BUILDING, EVEN IF THE BUILDING IS STILL DEADLINED, I AM STUNNING WHAT TO DO, I thought I'd take a look at his project. My nerves are paralyzed. He is doing the image configuration from one floor to the other in 10 minutes. I couldn't pass in 15 minutes and I hung up. Uğur oflaz
There is no such problem. Waiting for 15 minutes between screens indicates a hardware inadequacy as well as performance loss.The model of your video card is important and especially the latest drivers. I suggest you to update it from its own site and change your video card if necessary.
"uğur oflaz":22rujkrn" said:
If this structure collapses despite the addition of such a reinforcement screen, there is a problem with this program.
There is no problem with the program. This interpretation is also not always valid. As in this project, beams collapse as brittle elements. According to TDY, the project is therefore in a collapse zone. Again, TDY gives the right to evaluate the performance level of the structure more positively, provided that the brittle elements are strengthened. I applied performance analysis of the attached project in version 6.01. The performance of the building is attached. In the project with a building importance coefficient of 1.4, the importance coefficient should be taken as 1 during the performance analysis according to TDY. And in order to achieve this performance, we have to strengthen some beams that collapse without shear (brittle elements). No matter how many curtains you add to the structure, if your beams are brittle, your building is directly in the collapse zone. (Earthquake regulations 7.7.2, 7.7.3 and 7.7.4) Therefore, based on these articles, we can not say that I added many curtains to the structure and could not strengthen the structure. However, we have the ability to exempt the relevant staff from the collapse zone by notifying the program that you will already be empowering them. This option is asked to the developer when receiving a performance report. (In the project I added to the message, you can disable the option to count brittle elements in the collapse area...) The attached screenshot shows the list of elements that collapsed as brittle in this project. These elements should be strengthened.
"uğur oflaz":22rujkrn" said:
FEW MONTHS SINCE THE 6.01 VERSION WAS RELEASED, THE REINFORCEMENT CURTAINS ARE UNRESOLVED.
There is a problem with the bearing capacity moments during the performance analysis in the panels entered by selecting the retrofit option in version 6.01. I have explained this before in the forum. .
The topic has also been submitted to our R&D and will be in the new update version.
For now, the performance of the structure can be evaluated correctly provided that the reinforcement curtain option is not checked in the program.However, if you do not want to use it like this, you have the chance to transfer the data to the 6.0055' version and perform a performance analysis there. .
"uğur oflaz":22rujkrn" said:
PROGRAMMERS DO NOT USE THIS MENU, AS A NOTE, AS A NOTE THAT THEY HAVE NOT FIXED IT FOR MONTHS, DUE TO KNOWING IT. UNFORTUNATELY. I really have a hard time understanding. While the European of the hand recalls thousands of defective cars, our friends do not warn them with a small note on their site. Moreover, they do not fix it for months. give up right. Uğur oflaz
All issues are discussed and expressed clearly in the forum, and our programmer friends are also aware of these issues. In this direction, ideYAPI is constantly working on version updates. Your same message as content has been deleted because it has been repeated twice. Good work...