Steel floor load transfer

A

Apocalpyse

New Member
Are the loads of the steel floors transferred correctly in my attached project? Would you check. I defined the love under the steel floor. How do you think I should define it? Also, is my steel cross definition correct? The cross sections seem sufficient, but it seems to me a little less.
 
I reanalyzed the mrb project according to sufficient sections. it seems like my roof lovers are a bit exaggerated. Could you review the cross-sections? How can I overcome the alpha problem on the mezzanine, if it were a reinforced concrete structure, we would have added a few curtains, but this is not the case in this building.
 
Hello there; You should define the secondary beam, not the purlin under the floors. Non-load-bearing floors for lovers. First, make this edit. Then, the reason why the cross-sections of your roof purlins are high is that they are included in the analysis model. If you click on the purlin icon from the toolbar, select the option to include the 3rd icon from the left in the analysis model, and click on the purple colored purlins once on the screen and make sure that their colors turn gray. Be sure to divide the lovers at all intersections. You can get more detailed information from the link.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Well, how can I check if the cross sections are sufficient if we do not include the purlins in the analysis model Thank you Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top