static 6.012 hasp error

M

mertoni

New Member
I removed my lock of the static 6.012 program from my desktop system to draw a project on the laptop and connected it to the laptop and it gave the error (feature has expired) hl0041. I couldn't run the program no matter what I did, I'm waiting for an urgent solution
 
According to the error message, your lock is timed and expired. During the trial period, a time-defined lock was given to our users who requested the program. You can update the normal lock by contacting ideYAPI Bursa. Take it easy, good work
 
I HAVE SOLVE A NEW PROJECT IN V6. AND I HAVE CIRCULATED IN THE BASIC BEAM EXTENSIONS, EXTENSIONS LIKE THE CONSOLE I CANNOT MEAN. I MUST MAKE A FAULT SOMEWHERE.THAT'S IF YOU HELP...
 
136. THERE IS A TERRIBLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SAIMA PROJECT THAT I SENT, EVEN IF I DID NOT PRINT THE EXPLANATIONS PART IN V6 WHILE THE ACCOUNT STATUS WAS 24 IN V5. WHY ..EVEN IF WE USE BACKED BACKED, 68 SHEETS ARE ALWAYS A VERY,VERY SERIOUS PAPER PROBLEM?
 
"evrenor59":2zmlf2rp" said:
I DEFINITELY SOLVE THE SAIMA PROJECT I SENT, IN V5. WHY WAS THE ACCOUNT OUTPUTS 24 IN V5 136. WHY CAN I USE THE DIFFERENCE IN V6 EVEN IF I DID NOT PRINT THE EXPLANATIONS? IS IT NOT A VERY.VERY SERIOUS PAPER PROBLEM?
Click to expand...
Our goal in the report outputs in version 6 was to provide more information with shaped explanations. The reports were prepared in book format with cause and effect relationship, and it was tried to ensure that the designer and the auditor could easily find what they were looking for. It doesn't seem right to me that it is seen as a problem.If there are titles that you deem unnecessary, you have a chance not to print their reports anyway..
 
Hello there; The pointless consoles you mentioned: It is a nice feature added in V6 to ensure that the reinforcement of the non-continuous foundation beams is not finished at the column axis, but continues up to the boundary of the foundation beam where it intersects. Thanks to this feature, the problems encountered in practice related to the shortness of the support additions were solved. There was a mishap in your project, you made the program perceive the foundation beams, which were supposed to be continuous, as if they were discontinuous. If you type 30 in the CONTINUOUS ACCEPTANCE OF ANGLE DIFFERENCE SMALL BEAMERS from the Reinforced Concrete General Settings menu, your problem will be solved and you will get a correct drawing for the application. I am attaching the corrected version of your project for you to see the difference. I wish you good work.
 
"evrenor59":35df8gia" said:
I SOLVED A NEW PROJECT IN V6. AND I HAVE CIRCLED EXTENSIONS LIKE THE CONSOLE I CANNOT MEAN. I MUST MAKE A FAULT IN A PLACE. In your project, the continuous foundation beams make small angles with each other.One of the innovations of the 6 version is that the beam share in the other direction is automatically taken into account at the grid intersections in the continuous foundation and the reinforcement is automatically extended to the other beam face.This possibility gives the most ideal result in continuous foundations that connect each other at 90 degrees. Since the angle between the connecting foundations approaches zero degrees, the reinforcements are drawn as if they continue to the next beam. However, it is more logical to draw them continuously. We must specify in the program that we want to do this, that we want to draw the foundation beams continuously. In the Parameter/General Reinforced Concrete parameters, enter a value for the angle difference. For example, say 25 ece: TK3-TK4 TK15-TK16-TK17 will provide continuous drawing in itself. You can change this angle according to your needs, and you can arrange according to the angles of the foundation beams you want to draw continuously. Take it easy, good work...
Click to expand...
 
"evrenor59":37xw5i4a" said:
I DEFINITELY SOLVE THE SAIMA PROJECT THAT I SENT, IN V5. 136. WHY CAN I USE GEAR, EVEN IF I DID NOT PRINT THE EXPLANATIONS IN V6, WHILE THE ACCOUNT OUTPUTS ARE 24 IN V5? IS IT NOT A VERY SERIOUS PAPER ISSUE?
Click to expand...
Hello ideCAD Static 6 version reports have been redesigned to be more understandable. Differences of 6 version reports from 5 versions -Terms, explanations and visual information about the report have been added to the first page of each report. Each report starts from a new page because it is prepared in tabular form and contains header information. -Not given in 5 versions and requested by our users, *Building layouts *Build summary information *Slab load analysis, deflection control, thickness control *Beam load analysis, deflection and crack control Additional reports such as , have been added. For such reasons, there is a significant increase in the number of report pages,
 
I ACTUALLY KNOW FROM V5 VERSION THAT IT SHOULD BE GIVEN THAT VALUE. BUT I CANNOT FIND WHERE IT WAS IN V6. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I HOPE THE VISUAL ANIMATION OF THE V6 CAN BE OUT OFFER QUICKLY AND I DON'T HAVE TO DISTURB YOU.
 
If we make the angle 0, it gives unnecessary projection, if we do not do it as in the example of that project, the inclined continuous foundation beams make uninterrupted beam expansion as if they are straight. I think it was better in v 5.14. It showed the expansions of the inclined beams as one piece, it is no longer possible to show the expansion in this way..it creates confusion. The master who will apply this will also be confused. maybe he will think that the extra protrusions are the neighboring beam and will not prepare the reinforcements of the other beam. However, they are the projections to ensure continuity. Am I right, Mr. HAKAN?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top