First of all, I would like to say hello to everyone... As a civil engineer, I am happy that our own product, Static programs, is available in our country. I use ideStatik because I think that ideCad is the most beautiful and professional among them. I appreciate and even applaud the development of IdeCad over the years. I have no doubt that it will get even better. For this reason, I would like to share some of my findings and suggestions with you here. I may have mentioned some of them before in the forum or it may be due to my lack of knowledge. I apologize in advance if I stumble upon him. Analysis and Reports In cases where the solution of the 1st ladder is made together with the structure; The effects of the ladder effects on the support elements cannot be followed from the reports. The fixed and live loads on the beams due to the ladder and the influences on other elements are not printed in the reports as ladders. In the load analysis of the beams on which the ladder is supported, although there are repetitive and live load lines of unknown origin, the a and b values are always 0 and the load values are always the same, regardless of the support location. 2. TS 500 slab thickness control is not performed on stair slabs. 3. Although different reinforcement diameters are chosen in the reinforcement selection of the columns, a reinforced concrete design is always made with a single reinforcement diameter. For example, although 14 and 16 diameters are selected in major and minor directions, the program uses only 14 diameters, and although it varies according to the column size, it gives statically higher than the required pursanta or 1%. (Combining the two diameters in major and minor directions, it gives 1.12% allowance instead of 1.01% allowance.) 4. The effects of the beams inserted into any beam from the middle region except the beam end point are not printed on each other in the calculation reports and cause hesitation. 5. In reports, beam normal force control for all beams can be printed in tabular form. Beams with normal strength exceeding 0.1Ac.fck should be equipped as columns, so this situation should no longer be an error. 6. It would be nice if we could model the columns as shells, such as 30/150, which we entered with the column object, or when we entered with the panel object, the reinforcement design could be given as a column. 7. With the latest version, I get the warning 'beam width cannot be less than 25 cm' for some secondary beams that do not support columns or shear walls. (It doesn't give an error in all of them.) 8. The minimum tension zone reinforcement ratio is not controlled in beams whose span tension zone is at the top. Drawing and Other 9. In the column application plan, only the head and middle region lengths are given for the curtain long direction, and the misalignments are not given. 10. I think it would be nice to add the curtain scale parameter such as plan and column scale for the other curtains, except for the curtains whose two ends are supported on the column in the column application plan. 11. In the column application plan, I think it is necessary to write the number of reinforcements in the middle zone, except for the reinforcement interval for the wall middle zone. There may be problems in the application. This is given in the curtain details, but not in the column application. 12. It would be nice if the number of crossties in the column plan section and their vertical spacing are given in the column application plan. 13. I use multiple stirrups in column stirrup design. But I am having difficulty in getting some stirrup details applied in construction as in the screenshot. I want to wrap the stirrups that do not wrap the column from the outside in one go, from the outside in one go and give the second stirrup in another way. It would be great if we could do this from the column settings during the design and save it as a template for that column size. Although we can easily draw stirrups during drawing, it is necessary to prepare the details and write down their length. (Figures below) 14. Adding a delete command to the command line will be very useful. Delete key is useless while drawing. 15.Cannot move text objects with scale command. Thank you in advance...