Some features I want added to ideCAD

D

design_building

New Member
HELLO, MY HOLY RECOMMENDATION IS SOME FEATURES THAT WOULD LIKE TO MEET US 1. SYNCHRONIZING THE DRAWING AND THE MODEL. AUTOMATIC REFLECTION OF THE MODELS MADE TO THE DRAWING. 2.BEAM EXTENSIONS AND REINFORCEMENTS ARE INCREDIBLY DISAPPOINTED. ESPECIALLY IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME TO COLLECT THE BEAMS WITH PARTLY TRANSFERRING AND EDIT THEIR REINS. 4. COLUMN VERTICALS ARE GIVEN IN SEQUENCE AS S1 S2 S3. 5. FITTING THE DRAWINGS ON THE AUTOMATIC SHEET (SINGLE SHEET) 6. THE LETTERHEAD IN THE MOLD PLANS. 7. AUTOMATIC SPLITTING RIBBONS MORE THAN 4 METERS ON RIBBONS OR CREATE A WAY TO SPLIT WITHOUT CONVERTING TO CASSETTE. 8. REFLECTING THE CHANGE MADE IN THE POLYGON COLUMNS TO ALL FLOORS. 9. HOW WE SET THE MIN. REINFORCEMENT RANGE ON THE RIBBONS AND BEAMS, IT DOESN'T SHALL THE REINFORCEMENTS THAT WON'T FIT IN THE SECTION AND FAILS? 10. HOWEVER, DEFINITELY INSUFFICIENT DEPLOYMENT IN THE RIBS, THIS ERROR APPEARES IN THE ELECTIVE REPORTS NOT ON THE REINFORCED CONCRETE TAB. WE ARE VERY SATISFIED WITH THE PROGRAM NOW. THIS WILL MAKE THE PROGRAM MORE PERFECT FOR US. GOOD WORK
 
If I humbly add one or two items, if the column size changes in the lower floors, if it grows automatically on the upper floors, if the increased number of reinforcements on the upper floors is processed automatically on the lower floor, as our friend said, if there is automatic division and typical beam determination in the cassette flooring system, we would be happy if a beam drawing is carried out on the slab ends on the slabs laid with the slab edge. I have a small problem in the 8 version, I hope it's just me. There is a problem when manually measuring the mold plans. I can draw in 8 versions, save in 7 versions and measure them.
 
"design_building":1vubauvk" said:
4. ORDERING COLUMN VERTICALS AS S1 S2 S3.
Click to expand...
This should be done in the expansion settings / advanced settings tab / with the edit blocks by name command. But I guess a name for the blocks in block creation Because the same command works correctly in beam expansions, because beam blocks are given names consisting of beam names here. Although there is a command for curtain and column expansions, it does not work, I think this issue will be solved in a simple way.
"design_building":1vubauvk" said:
5. AUTOMATIC FITTING OF DRAWINGS TO A SHEET (SINGLE SHEET)
Click to expand...
This feature is available in detail expansions and even in column applications. But I don't know how accurate it is to be in the mold plans. In general, the biggest adjustments need to be made in the formwork plans. Then, the screen size of the drawing file to be worked on grows unnecessarily and the dominance decreases. Can you explain more clearly what you want and why?
"design_building":1vubauvk" said:
6. LETTERHEAD IN MOLD PLANS.
Click to expand...
+1
"design_building":1vubauvk" said:
7. RIBBONS OVER 4 METERS ON RIBBONS FORM AUTOMATIC SPLITTING OR CONVERTING TO CASSETTE.
Click to expand...
I agree. +1
"tayfuner":1vubauvk" said:
if the increasing number of reinforcements on the upper floors are processed automatically on the lower floors
Click to expand...
This column and shear wall is also available in V8. You can handle it from the reinforced concrete design / parameters / column (and curtain) parameters section. [quote ="tayfuner":1vubauvk"]I have a small problem in the 8 version, I hope it's just me and there is a problem when manually measuring the plans. I can draw in 8 versions, save and measure in 7 versions[/quote] What kind of trouble do you face. It would be good if you could explain in detail. We did not encounter any problems.
 
I guess you didn't understand me. I said that we should automatically fit the beam extensions in a single sheet. Normally, we enlarge the sheet manually and get drawings. I already know what you said about naming, but the column duplexes do not appear in order. I did not say that there is such a problem with the beams. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
Also, if I create the details in a single window instead of in a single sheet, it will already be printed in a single window. Do not confuse a single sheet and a single window, what I have said is very clear. I already know and use the features you wrote, I just said that I would be more pleased if these things I wrote were added. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
"design_building":sd8kdk2h" said:
2.BEAM OPENINGS AND REINFORCEMENTS ARE LOOKING UNBELIEVABLE. ESPECIALLY IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME TO COLLECT THE BEAMS WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE AND REINFORCEMENTS. ] Hello, There was a situation you previously reported about beam expansions, and it was a special problem that occurs when partial transitions occur. This problem has been reported to R&D. However, the statement "beam expansions and reinforcements are unbelievably messy" indicates a very general problem beyond the situation you know. .. We ask you to send other examples to support your statement. Please add example projects other than the situation you already know, which are messy and you have time to fix...
"design_building":sd8kdk2h" said:
Also, I don't see the details in one window, but instead If you create a layout, it will already be printed in a single window.
Click to expand...
The design possibilities are developed in the program. By using the layout design possibilities, you can collect all your drawings in a single sheet. Moreover, the drawings work conjugately in the layout design. For example, let's say you have included a mold plan in the layout design. If you make a change in the die plan, when you renew the layout design, the die plan in the layout design will be automatically renewed. I suggest you review these possibilities.
Click to expand...
 
Please don't misunderstand what I wrote is not a complaint. Some additions that will make us even more happy to have what I wrote. As you know, the only program where there will be a partial transition is idecad. In his drawings, the texts and reinforcements overlap due to the density. I know that editing is done manually. Only if possible, these expansions can be given more orderly. I have many projects related to this. The thing I sent before was about the account, what I'm talking about this time is the detail drawings. I wish you good work. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
"design_building":1ycwswa1" said:
My writings are not complaints, please don't get me wrong. Some additions that will make us even more happy to have what I wrote. As you know, idecad is the only program where there will be a partial transition. Texts and reinforcements in your drawings overlap due to density. Editing manually I know that it has been done. Only if possible, these expansions can be given more orderly. I have many projects related to this. The thing I sent before was about calculations. What I'm talking about this time is the detail drawings. I wish you good work. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Again hello, Every message written in the forum is meticulously read, examined and noted... Our aim is to be able to determine exactly the suggestions of our users and to obtain concrete references for future versions. Thank you for your attention and notifications.
 
"design_building":3lv3k882" said:
I guess you didn't understand me. I said let's automatically fit the beam openings in a single sheet. Normally we enlarge the sheet manually and draw. I already know what you said about naming, but the column verticals are not sequential. Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I'm here: "Because the same command works correctly on beam expansions. Because here, beam blocks are given names consisting of beam names. Although there is a command in curtain and column expansions, it doesn't work. I think this problem will be solved simply. When I said "", I meant programmer in a sense, not you. So " ]why didn't you do what you did on the beams in other details". In addition, we do not know which command you know or not when answering the questions. We write answers in good faith. Even if you know, by adding as much information, pictures and details as possible, thinking that someone else who reads is informed by this way. We are trying to reply. We apologize if this caused any inconvenience.
 
N. Yılmaz, I wrote in response to the other friend, I agree with what you said, it was a bit of a mess, but you're right :) Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
I wrote that NYILMAZ, when you wrote the same things on what your friend said, probably didn't know this command. I didn't continue so that the event would not get bigger, but you say I don't want to make arrangements on a single sheet, I said that you want the program in one window no matter how many beams there are, so I said you can do what you want with a small adjustment. I'm sorry if my words hurt you.
 
I mentioned it before, but if I write it again maybe it will be taken into account. Especially in cantilever type ribbed floors, closing the entire frame with rib teeth reduces the leveling work at the end of the project. The same identification system is available in sta4cad. In addition, when the basement curtain was tried to be defined in the 8.5 version, it started to divide the slab edges in the architectural mode. Now I can define the sub-basement system only with a 50cm floor definition. Is it possible to switch to the old system in this regard? Thanks
 
"ssesli":2zudekde" said:
...Also, when trying to define a basement curtain in version 8.5, it started to divide the slab edges in architectural mode. Now I can define the sub-basement system only with a 50cm floor definition. Thank you
Click to expand...
Hello, You can make the panels you want to be one piece into one piece with the command "Merge" in the "Modify" menu (or Panel assistant toolbar).
 
Thank you, Leven tbey, but what I mean is that the balcony slab formed by the slab edge is also cut. I am sharing the screenshot with you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top