Selection of beams and columns according to the architectural floor plan

there are too many studs, especially on the q and r axes, you should not stud the beam on both sides without beams. you should work a little more for the column places, pulling it in will save you from the studs
 
Hello, Some determinations of data entry in the project are as follows; -1.Floor K18 beam is entered between S20-S21. Not connecting to P03 and P04. - It is recommended that the K11 and K12 beams and the K13-14 beams in a similar situation be entered as one piece with the same width and height. It would be appropriate to model the beams between the columns S10-12, S13-S11, s14-P01, P01-S15, S16-S17 on the 2nd floor and other floors and beams in similar situations as one piece. (You can make the beam one piece with the "join" command in the beam toolbar.) Good work.
 
We have previously made evaluations about this project. As far as I can see, our evaluations were ignored and asked again. We would understand if some changes were made and asked, but asking for opinions without considering the criticisms that we consider serious means "confirm the mistakes I have made"?
 
THE SUCH ROOF LOADS HAVE BEEN REDUCED, BECAUSE THE SIZE IS LARGE, I DELETED THE TOP LAYERS AND ADDED IT TO THE FORM. BEYOND THAT, THE COLUMN THAT NEEDED TO BE CONNECTED TO THE BEAM WAS FIXED. IT WAS ACCEPTED AS IT LOOKS IN THE ARCHITECTURE, BECAUSE WALL LOADS ARE ADDED TO THE BEAMERS. THE STUD BARS I STAND ON HERE WAS THE POSITIONING OF COLUMNS AND THE FAILURE TO SOLVE THE CONTINUOUS FOUNDATION AND THE RADIATE FOUNDATION. THANK YOU
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top