School Project Design

B

bymhndis

New Member
Hello, I added curtains to the carrier system. I could not get rid of the irregularity of a1 (I have hesitations because it is HIGH, I know that irregularity is not the rule). The sg pursantaj in some columns is in 1.6s and is constantly changing to different columns. I am open to any comments and suggestions regarding the positions of the curtains and the directions of the columns. Good work everyone.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Hello. The link you uploaded gives a VERY RISKY VIRUS WARNING. We will help you if you install it after doing a virus check. Upload your project here. This site is clean.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Ünver ÖZCAN
 
I usually try not to exceed 1 percent in my projects. I increase the size of the columns. Do you think I'm doing an exaggeration?
 
Hello My suggestions;
"bymhndis":1rjb43s2" said:
I added curtains to the carrier system, I couldn't get rid of the a1 irregularity (I'm hesitant because it's HIGH, I know the irregularity doesn't matter).
Click to expand...
--It doesn't matter since you're using dynamic method. It is also mentioned in the report.
"bymhndis":1rjb43s2" said:
The sg pursantaj in some columns is at 1.6s and is constantly changing to different columns.
Click to expand...
--sg pursantaj is 1.6 in two columns, it doesn't matter.
"bymhndis":1rjb43s2" said:
Statically necessary purchase price I usually try not to exceed 1 percent in my projects. I increase the column sizes. Do you think I'm doing an exaggeration, is it correct or is it okay to have it up to the maximum pursantaj (up to 3 percent)?
Click to expand...
-- There may be a few in the building up to 3% (If you have to, in my opinion.) But there should be no brittle fracture in the thick column under the recommended 2%, --You can reduce the live loads in the attic, --General settings/load- You can apply the security/TS498/residential office load reduction article, --Remove the beams on the P13-P14-P15 curtains, --Remove the flooding on the P13-P14-P15 curtains, After doing these, the B errors and pursantans on the columns are corrected.
 
.... In addition, delete the S18 column in the Attic, I guess it was forgotten. I think the subbasement tick in P13-14-15 is correct. should remain marked. I could not understand the reason for the live loads on the beams in the middle axle (corridor). You put a live load because there is no wall, but why is there a 0.5 load on the beam while the floor loads are 0.35. NY
 
Hello Mr. Nedim
"NYILMAZ":otjr9ij5" said:
I think the sub-basement tiki in P13-14-15 is correct.
Click to expand...
I wondered why these curtains should be given in such a way that the curtains attached to the floor covering are not attached to the floor like the flood curtains. Did you choose? Unver ÖZCAN
 
Unver, the basement (that is, the floor where the said curtains are located) is not marked as a rigid basement. If we were to define this floor as a rigid floor, it would not matter if you marked the walls in question as the basement/shear that does not continue to the upper floor. Basement curtains are[/color] [/u][/b]curtains that are entered in floors without a rigid basement and do not continue along the height of the floor or building. That's why I said they should have signs. I would also like to add for your information: When the option of the panel that does not continue to the basement/upstairs is checked, these curtains are not included in the calculation of alpha S and the B1 irregularity effective cutting area. Alpha S control is done on the floor above the rigid floor. For this reason, it is not necessary to mark the curtains on the floors that are considered as rigid as subfloor/panels that do not continue to the upper floor. Otherwise, it should be marked. There is no rigid floor acceptance here. If there is a curtain along the floor height on a floor that is not considered rigid, it must be added to the basement/upper floor so that the relevant curtain is not included in the AlfaS calculation. Discontinued panel option should be checked. N. YILMAZ
 
Hello, first of all, thank you for your comments. S18 I did not delete your arm, nedim, you are right, I missed it before sending it. As you said, the corridor floors were 0.5, and it remained at 0.35 because I was constantly deleting and renewing it. I have read the article of a teacher about this, so that a load equal to the surface area is not neglected in beams where there is no wall, I give the live load on the floor to the beam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top