Risky building analysis infill walls

M

mgeresin

New Member
With versions 7.019 and 7.020, risky building analysis has been added. Is taking into account the infill walls in the risk building determination regulation added to the program, if so, how will it be done. good work
 
Hello, In the risky building analysis, the wall areas are calculated automatically with a linear calculation from the wall loads entered on the beam. In addition, the user can manually enter the wall infill areas from the Akx and Aky columns in the Irregularities Tab in the Analysis/Floor Parameters dialog. Good work
 
3.5.2. In the direction where the evaluation is made on the critical floor of the building and if the maximum story drift ratio is less than 0.015, the infill wall effect can be taken into account by multiplying the earthquake force calculated in 3.5.1 with the coefficient of 0.75. (The New Regulation) already takes the program wall loads automatically, there is no problem with it, but in the new regulation, it is mentioned that the earthquake forces will be multiplied by a coefficient of 0.75 for the positive effect of the infill walls on the earthquake force, does the new update cover them?
 
According to the risky building evaluation regulation, the condition that the stirrup hook is 135 degrees in the column classification table is an important criterion. I guess we can't report this to the program.
 
"mhanifiata":222yn2ve" said:
According to the risky building evaluation regulation, the condition that the stirrup hook is 135 degrees in the column classification table is an important criterion. I think we cannot inform the program.
Click to expand...
We can. If it is marked, it means that there is stirrup tightening in full compliance with the regulation (with 135 degree hooks).
 
"HakanŞahin":291xr895" said:
"mhanifiata":291xr895" said:
According to the risky building evaluation regulation, the condition that the stirrup hook is 135 degrees in the column classification table is an important criterion. I guess we can't report this to the program.
Click to expand...
We can. If Stirrup Tightening in the Performance Analysis tab is checked in Column/Break settings, it means there is stirrup tightening in full compliance with the regulation (with a hook of 135 degrees). If it is not marked, it means there is no stirrup with 135 degree hook. In the calculation of column shear capacity, the value defined in the column reinforced concrete dialog is "stirrup diameter/mid region range/compression range".
Click to expand...
Thank you, Hakan. that is, if there is no 135 degree hook, we do not mark that part in the settings. but still etr. If there is a tightening and 90 hooks, we can give the column stirrup as if it is tightened in the reinforced concrete menu. this does not make the other option ineffective.
 
"mhanifiata":1rppq3ew" said:
thanks Mr. Hakan. so if there is no 135 degree hook, we do not mark that part in the settings. .
Click to expand...
Yes, as you wrote... If there is no stirrup tightening, we give the middle region range as the compaction region range...
 
this is part 3 of the file... just out of curiosity, I did a risk assessment. In the introduction of this new system, such negative consequences were said to be dead-end.
 
the same structure, under the same conditions, according to tdy 2007, it comes out in accordance with the design in terms of performance...
 
"mhanifiata":3mran23h" said:
the building I redesigned is risky. file 3 part
Click to expand...
"mhanifiata":3mran23h" said:
this is the 3rd part of the file... it's just risky because I'm curious I made an assessment. In the introduction of this new system, it was said that there would be no such negative consequences.
Click to expand...
Did you update to 7.020? Because there is no problem after risky building analysis...
 
Without entering any Akx Aky, the program assigns value, according to what. Also, since we can calculate reinforcement with 1.4g+1.6q loading in beams, we need to analyze without earthquakes. It is necessary to enter user-defined Ao :0 in the Analysis tab, right? good work.
 
"mgeresin":2fq5u8gj" said:
The program assigns values without entering any Akx Aky, and according to what. Since we will calculate reinforcement with 1.4g+1.6q loading on beams, we need to analyze without earthquakes. In the Analysis tab, we need to enter user-defined Ao:0 Good work.
Click to expand...
A wall area is created from the walls you enter the beams. For a more precise calculation, you can enter the wall area value in the relevant columns. However, this does not mean that you will not enter a wall load on the beams.
 
RISKY BUILDING ANALYSIS regulation article 3.2.3 ------ Since we will be calculating reinforcement with 1.4g+1.6q loading in beams, we need to analyze without earthquakes. It is necessary to enter user-defined Ao:0 in the Analysis tab, right? good work.
 
"mgeresin":gmdorsa9" said:
RISKY BUILDING ANALYSIS regulation article 3.2.3 ------ Since we will calculate reinforcement with 1.4g+1.6q loading on beams, we need to analyze without earthquakes. In the Analysis tab, it is necessary to enter user-defined Ao :0 GOOD WORK.
Click to expand...
You can enter the Structure Importance Factor as zero.You can select "Increase beam capacities according to vertical calculation" option in the analysis dialog.
 
Since fcm is the existing concrete compressive strength at 0.65*fcm in the Risky Building Detection Regulation, the program calculates 0.65*fcm: 596.53 for c 10. How do you find this value?
 
"mgeresin":2a1r922e" said:
Since 0.65*fcm is the existing concrete compressive strength in the risky building detection regulation, the program calculates 0.65*fcm : 596.53 for c 10. How does it find this value[/ quote] C10 -> 10 MPa Convert to t/m2 fcm= 1019.716 tf/m2 If you used minimum information level you would multiply fcm by 0.9 0.65*fcm= 0.65* 1019.716 * 0.9 = 596.53 tf/m2
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top